Amnesty One To One - 10 reasons to NOT abolish the death penalty / 10 raisons pour NE PAS abolir la peine de mort
СтатистикаBy @WomenRightsTelegram @DefenceTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @FactsTelegramChannels - All scientific channels against @AmnestyPropaganda! @AmnestyShit @AmnestyFacts https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx @DeathPenaltyOneToOne
- Последний пост
- 3 мар. 2025 г.
- Последнее чтение
- 12 авг.
- Постов за неделю
- 0
- Всего постов
- 20
- Тип
- открытый
- Язык
- английский
- В каталоге с
- 12 авг.
- 1/24сутки в ленте
- —
- 1/48двое суток
- —
- 1/72трое суток
- —
Оценка по просмотрам недавних постов: пост набирает почти всё за первые сутки.
Посты
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
без подписи
без подписи
без подписи
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1:1 pena de muerte / death penalty Part 7 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So again, AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE (= University of Oxford) ARE FAKE SCIENCE AND INFOS! where Carolyn is 1000x better than Amnesty BUT STILL YEARS AWAY FROM BEING PERFECT! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Not just them, even John Bessler and co. are BULLSHIT! https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia Please don't come here with BULLSHIT SCIENCE ABOUT HOMICIDES! since we already verified all such things previously! and we are even ready to verify other things if needed! https://t.me/AmnestyFake https://t.me/AmnestyFacts 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx This means even LESS BULLSHIT ABOUT RECIDIVISM! https://t.me/RecidivismFacts or considering some crimes less "worse" since you keep eyes closed about all what is happening BEFORE OR AFTER THE CRIME! https://t.me/SuicideRape https://t.me/BreivikTrauma https://t.me/EmpathyTelegram Related https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/361 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/304 etc. The difference between us and the other two? We share both sides, even if we support death penalty for SOME (not all) crimes! and we are not saying YOU NEED TO IMPLEMENT THAT PUNTO E BASTA! Because even implementing that, doesn't mean implementing that for all crimes or or or! Everyone can do what he wants BUT ONLY AFTER CONSIDERING ALL FACTS! not bullshit! and ALL POINT OF VIEWS! not just from a criminal point of view, forgetting guards, innocent killed, homeless, etc! Check all previous one to one: https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights 8. Acuerdos internacionales para la abolición de la pena de muerte YES EXACTLY 🇪🇺 EUROPE IS A GREAT MAFIA! https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyIgnorance/211 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/723 Not just related to death penalty! https://t.me/EuropeFacts Innocent https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/178
без подписи
без подписи
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 El efecto de la abolición en los índices de delincuencia - The effect of abolition on crime rates En Canadá, por ejemplo, el índice de homicidios por 100.000 habitantes descendió del 3,09 en 1975, el nivel máximo alcanzado y correspondiente al año anterior a la abolición de la pena de muerte para el delito de asesinato, al 2,41 en 1980, y desde entonces ha descendido aún más. En 2002, 26 años después de la abolición de la pena capital, el índice de homicidios era del 1,85 por 100.000 habitantes, un 40 por ciento inferior al de 1975. In Canada, for example, the homicide rate per 100,000 inhabitants fell from 3.09 in 1975, the highest level reached and corresponding to the year before the abolition of the death penalty for the crime of murder, to 2.41 in 1980. , and has since fallen even further. In 2002, 26 years after the abolition of capital punishment, the homicide rate was 1.85 per 100,000 inhabitants, 40 percent lower than in 1975. Here we go! THIS IS BULLSHIT OF AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE! https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/92 https://t.me/CarolynHoyle/19 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 Backup https://perma.cc/GRS4-RZT4 https://perma.cc/K5H7-52NA https://perma.cc/J3F3-ZWNG 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx and WE DON'T SUPPORT SUCH BULLSHIT AT ALL! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/15 So again Carolyn Hoyle, you are not fully bad! BUT YOU ARE NOT PERFECT TOO! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle WE DON'T SUPPORT MAFIOUS RESEARCHER! Share all facts and share TRUE FACTS! not just half of the informations by posting Table 9.1 Australia: Murder and manslaughter, rate per 100,000 persons, 1993–2005 when THIS IS AFTER!!! LAST EXECUTION OR THE BAN! without showing WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE THAT OR DURING THAT! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 https://perma.cc/8QRH-3AR4
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX! Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into account when attempt- ing to control for those other factors that might affect both the homicide rate and the execution rate? EXACTLY!!! Factors that may affect the homicide rate, outside gun ownership, are difficult to measure because they are facets of the more general social climate and culture, such as migration, the effectiveness of informal social controls, the extent of alcohol abuse, the availability and price of illegal drugs, the degree of communal integration, and the extent to which there is a ‘sub-culture of violence’ or alternative modes of relieving frustrations other than violence ... etc. https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/392 At least Carolyn Hoyle has brain and cite such things! instead OF IGNORING LIKE AMNESTY! Reason why Carolyn Hoyle is 1000x better than Amnesty! BUT still not perfect! sharing all points or facts ... https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Yet, ‘None of the new deterrence studies consider the epidemics of drug use and related violence" 🤦♂️ .... What about cannabis??? https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2284 Let we remember positive correlation between cannabis and homicides, if we exclude poor US states ... Does this mean cannabis increase homicides? NOPE! It's just correlation! NOT A FACT! Like death penalty cannot be correlated in the same way! https://t.me/AmnestyFake/373 In summary: "... no es prudente aceptar la hipótesis de que la pena capital tenga un mayor poder disuasorio sobre los asesinatos que la amenaza y aplicación de la cadena perpetua, pena supuestamente inferior" IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THIS; THERE IS MUCH MORE BEHIND! and who wrote this book is saying such things too!
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BEING PRO OR CONTRA RELATED TO THE TOPIC DETERRENT! but don't come here with the bullshit "no death penalty = less homicides!" BECAUSE THIS IS BULLSHIT! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx and we said previously, Carolyn is not considering all point of views and sometimes is writing bullshit, but she is doing still a better job than Amnesty! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle For, as Dezhbakhsh and Shepherd recognize, executions also have costs: ‘these include the harm from the death penalty’s possibly discriminatory application and the risk of executing innocent people. Policy makers must weigh the benefits and costs to determine the optimal use of the death penalty’ Read such posts https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/377 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/355 What she is writing: First, there is the problem of sufficient data. First, the percentage of people sentenced to death in the United States who actually are executed is minute so the data will always seem insufficient!! Second...the executions that do occur are disproportionately centered in a few states—indeed, close to a majority in a single state—so the various effects of skewing hamper sound empirical inference-drawing. The inference drawn is that the fear of capital punishment rather than long imprisonment will not restrain those who are apt to commit murder, because murder usually arises from an explosion of temper or loss of control, from mental illness or defective personality, or from panic when faced with imminent capture. Why exactly JUST TALKING ABOUT MURDERS!!! IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT MURDERS! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 We find that the existing evidence for deterrence is surprisingly fragile ... See next post
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 "Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment" "Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execution under any circumstances) would demand proof that executions have a substantial marginal deterrent effect" NOPE! WE GIVE A SHIT TO DETERRENT! Is NOT HUGE important for serious criminals! RECIDIVISM IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT! https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43 and we know that with death penalty WE KILL RECIDIVISM 100%! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/270 https://t.me/RecidivismFacts https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance https://t.me/BreivikParole https://t.me/ParoleFacts Do we keep in prison people that maybe will not do the same crime again? Well THIS IS PART OF THE SAFETY! and we do that with a life sentence too! Human Rights and Safety of the population = high recidivism risk = high prison escape or whatever > Human Rights of Serious Criminals! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/387 doesn't matter if Breivik will or will not redo a terror attack! BREIVIK IS A SERIOUS RISK and many other criminals are even a serious risk! https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/768 even if there is the possibility he will never do that again! DOESN'T MATTER! POPULATION > SERIOUS CRIMINALS! FOREVER! Plus the real question is deterrent of which type of crime, with which reason????! Why always just talking about deterrent!! Like we do with climate change, talking about average and saying that a baby is polluting exactly like a rich person 🤦♂️! https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/67 This is NOT science and facts! This is just 💩! No matter what, Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! See next post
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos. Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterrent power against crime than other punishments Yes, BUT EVEN THE OPPOSITE!!!!! because this cannot be showed with science! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102 and don't forget that such things DEPENDS FROM A LOT OF FACTORS!!! https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363 to https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404 It's like saying "if we give condoms for free, there are no pregnant women anymore" which would be just BULLSHIT! Plus is NOT just about deterrent! https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/364 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/375 "The evidence reviewed in this chapter should lead any dispassionate analyst to conclude that it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment, as practised in the United States, deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment" Who wrote that? Carolyn Hoyle! a researcher BEING PART OF THIS MAFIA WRITING BULLSHIT! like we showed previously! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle but still 1000x better than Amnesty! Let we check what she is writing "the non-experimental research to which the study of the deterrent effects of capital punishment is necessarily limited will almost certainly be unable to meet those standards of proof" "The only scientifically and ethically acceptable conclusion from the complete body of existing social science literature on deterrence and the death penalty is that it is impossible to tell whether deterrent effects are strong or weak or whether they exist at all . . . " See next post
без подписи
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 1 Una vez que se ha abolido la pena de muerte, rara vez se restablece ... Once the death penalty has been abolished, it is rarely reinstated. Obviously IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL! https://t.me/JohnBessler/132 and there is even 🇪🇺 EU MAFIA! https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia using 🇪🇺 council and other mafia methods to contrast that https://t.me/DeathPenaltyIgnorance/211 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/152 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/149 with bullshit facts https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/AmnestyFacts 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx ℹ️ https://t.me/JoinShareableChatFolders/16 Would be time that people DO A CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN TYPE / DEEP / REASON OF CRIMES! instead of putting all criminals in just one 🗑! which is NOT the case at all! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/293 En el año 2003, el 84 por ciento de todas las ejecuciones de las que se tuvo noticia tuvieron lugar en China, Estados Unidos, Irán y Vietnam. In 2003, 84 percent of all reported executions took place in China, the United States, Iran and Vietnam. Who gives a shit where they are applied! Check https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/299 Los tratados internacionales para la protección de los derechos humanos prohíben condenar a muerte a toda persona menor de 18 años en el momento de cometerse el delito. International treaties for the protection of human rights prohibit sentencing to death anyone under 18 years of age at the time of the crime. Yes, young people deserve death penalty, exactly like women or other, if such people are serious criminals with high recidivism! https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/135 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/176 Young people are criminal EXACTLY LIKE ADULTS! or even much worse in some cases! See next post
10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/613 ✅🙅♂️ 7 - la peine de mort ne ramène ni la stabilité sociale ni la paix intérieure des victimes. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/379 🙅♂️ 8 - la peine de mort nie la faillibilité des institutions humaines. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/379 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/380 🙅♂️✅ 9 - la peine de mort est une punition collective. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/380 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/381 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/382 🙅♂️ 10 - la peine de mort va contre les valeurs religieuses ou humanistes communes à l’ensemble de l’humanité. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/387 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/375 More one to one 🇫🇷 / 🇩🇪 / 🇮🇹 / 🇪🇸 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/390 All channels with science and facts! https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/AmnestyShit https://t.me/AmnestyFacts About homicides / recidivism https://t.me/AmnestyFake https://t.me/RecidivismFacts https://t.me/ParoleFacts https://t.me/BreivikParole https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram https://t.me/BreivikSyndrome etc. Our statement about Amnesty https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/DeathSentenceBullshit/1546 etc.
10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty 🙅♂️ 1 - la peine de mort viole le droit à la vie https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/375 🙅♂️ 2 - la peine de mort est une sanction cruelle et inhumaine. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/375 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/376 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ 3 - la peine de mort n’a aucun effet dissuasif. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/376 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/377 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/AmnestyFake https://t.me/AmnestyFacts https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🙅♂️ 4 - la peine de mort est un meurtre avec préméditation qui avilit l’Etat et rend la société plus violente. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/377 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/378 🙅♂️ 5 - la peine de mort est discriminatoire dans son application. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/378 https://t.me/GovernmentInPrison https://t.me/InPrisonNOW https://t.me/IgnoringCrimes https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/379 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/380 🙅♂️ 6 - la peine de mort nie la capacité de tout homme à s’amender et à devenir meilleur. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/382 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/383 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/384 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/385 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/386 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/387
Here we go our point of view about child rape: no prison 💩 < doing nothing with few years prison 💩 < death sentence + VIP SUICIDE = execution immediately / after few months / years 💩 (except for cannibalism) since this would probably just worse child abuse / rape! < (or =) castration + parole 💩 < castration 🥉< life sentence🥈 < death sentence + execution after 20+ years 🥇❤️ 100% proof: 💉 death sentence + execution after 20 years 99.99999999% proof: 🚔 life sentence 🙅♂️ death execution after 1 days / week / year! even if the other two options have 2 problems: cost and risk of prison evasion https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts Full new statement https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154 to https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2119 Let we check what @AmnestyShit is writing .... Forced chemical castration violates the absolute prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment under international human rights law .... https://perma.cc/XSL4-2RH4 Ok was better to not check that ... Amnesty: Furthermore, there is no evidence that the threat of chemical castration has been effective as a deterrent for acts of sexual violence against children Why always just talking about deterrent????! ARE YOU IDIOT OR WHAT? What about redoing that???! Yes, you are idiot, we already wrote that https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93 In fact, since the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) allowing chemical castration was issued by the president and passed by the House of Representatives into law in 2016, cases of sexual abuse against minors has increased over tenfold We haven't verified that, but not just because crimes increase, means people rape because of castration!!! You already said bullshit previously https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32 Chemical castrations will not solve a deficient police force or inadequately trained investigators https://perma.cc/RNA6-KZU2 At least here they write it a bit better than https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/19 The Presidential Regulation No. 1/2016 also widens the scope of the death penalty by imposing it as punishment for sexual violence against children in aggravating circumstances defined under Article 81 ❤️ https://perma.cc/VEY7-NYQZ Amnesty 💩 International opposes the death penalty in all circumstances and believes (YES THIS IS YOUR SCIENCE = OPINIONS!) that there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. Amnesty is bullshit promoting BULLSHIT to governments and UN! https://t.me/AmnestyShit/95 https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/723 https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/722 Plus again "deter" 🤦♂️ See next post
без подписи
Pena di morte: fatti e cifre / Death Penalty 1:1 with Amnesty Italia Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/293 Amnesty International si oppone alla pena di morte in tutti i casi senza eccezioni - without exception ... Would be cool that AMNESTY IS STARTING TO FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS WITHOUR EXCEPTION TOO! and this means even animal rights! Instead of fighting just for the shit they want! https://t.me/AmnestyShit/95 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/77 https://t.me/AmnestyFacts https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166 https://t.me/AfDWahrheit/25 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/76 etc. Like said previously https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/322 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134 io penso che sia inutile dato che la morte è una liberazione ai problemi della vita, un detenuto morto non riflette su quel che ha fatto, invece i lavoro obbligatori fanno riflettere, oltre che a dare contributi alla società I think it is useless given that death is a release from the problems of life, a dead prisoner does not reflect on what he has done, instead compulsory work makes you think, as well as making contributions to society A DEATH PENALTY SHOULD NOT BE A VIP SUICIDE!!!! and this mean the dude still remains at least 10 years in prison ... in general 20 years! https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60 https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/177 Comment by "tg-k6yt255" doesn't make ANY SENSE! No death penalty for serious crimes??! Exactly for what do you want to use death penalty? For freedom of speech, adultery, LGBT and similar things??! = 💩 https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences Even for terrorism death penalty could be used, if right wing! https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/62 https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence https://t.me/addlist/cCAHzkmLGz80ODcx https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/261