𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 (Anti Modern Versions - The KJB/The KJV Versus The Modern Versions)

The Truth About the LXX Septuagint - Dr Phil Stringer 1851 Brenton's Septuagint [English] - Based off of Alexandrian Vaticanis 1935 Renhart's Sept. Revised in 2006 - Based off of Synaiticus, Vaticanis, Alexandrinus and the Hexapla 230-240 AD Letter of Aristeas - Translated in 1903 by Henry Hackery The only remains of the letter were compiled by (((Josephus))) ✡️, quoting only 2/5th of the letter Which uses the Talmud as its witness (((Philo of Alexandria))) ✡️ [Which was a Hellenistic Jew] [YT Version] ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 & 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝕆𝕣𝕥𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏

Codex Vaticanus Exposed: Dr. Scot Mckendrick on "CODEX" VATICANUS -- is it really a fourth century manuscript? 💥 Short Answer: No, but it is from the 1400s-1500s and/or the late Middle Ages. [ Source of the YouTube Video ] 💥 👉🏻 [ Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Exposed Go To List ] How To Utilize the King James Bible vs What To Do To The Modern "bible" Versions MORE Follow 📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚 @AntiModernVersions

Notice: all the evil, gross bots, including those who recently tried a big, malicious, foolish attempt of them trying and failing an attempt of them flooding the Anti Modern Versions channel's subscriber count, & all spammers and anyone with degenerate wicked profile pictures are banned immediately and are not allowed at all in here and shouldn't even exist. All whores & all whoremongers and all sodomites & all spammers are banned permanently and are not allowed at all and cannot be a subscriber at all, as they'll be banned immediately. Degeneracy, garbage, unbiblical nonsense and lies, all whores, all whoremongers, all sodomites, and all wickedness are prohibited from entering into and viewing this official Anti Modern Versions channel and its content. Period. This policy of all the above words is consistently and daily enforced in this official Anti Modern Versions channel here.

Origen and the Hidden Hand 👆🏻 Concerning the Genesis account of creation, he wrote: "who is so silly as to believe that God ... planted a paradise eastward in Eden, and set in it a visible and palpable tree of life ... [and] anyone who tasted its fruit with his bodily teeth would gain life?" Occultists trying to undermine the Literal word of God from 180 after Christ. Reason why Cvcktholics and Cultvinists love Origen so much, so they can get away with ANY interpretation 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝕆𝕣𝕥𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏 ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔳𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔰𝔪 | ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 𝔐𝔞𝔰𝔬𝔫𝔯𝔶

𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘

In Revelation 13:16, the ESV changes and twists "in" into "on" in relation to the mark of the beast & creates many errors and contradictions in Revelation 13: ~ Revelation 13:16 1611 KJB ✅ 💯 📖 🏆 16 And he causeth all, both smal and great rich and poore,…

In Revelation 13:16, the ESV changes and twists "in" into "on" in relation to the mark of the beast & creates many errors and contradictions in Revelation 13: ~ Revelation 13:16 1611 KJB ✅ 💯 📖 🏆 16 And he causeth all, both smal and great rich and poore, free and bond, to receiue a marke in their right hand, or in their foreheads: ~ Revelation 13:16 ESV ❌ 😨 😱 ⚠️ 16 Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, 🤯 By making this subtil, drastic change of that 1 word, the ESV: 💥 Both removes and twists the Scriptures' prophecy of the mark being "in" [inside of] an individual's right hand or forehead and changes it into a mark being on a person's right hand or forehead. See and read Revelation 14:9-12 alonside Revelation 13:15-18 for comparsion. 💥 Subtily reduces the physical severity and the result of how bad the mark of the beast is. Consider that unlike a mark that is on the top of the top surface/skin layer of the forehead or right handhand or mark, a "mark" that is "in" a person cannot be removed without serious surgery or amputation. (Warning: Do not take the mark of the beast at all. Period.) 💥 Makes Revelation 13:16 contradict Revelation 14:9-12, lose its power of the seriousness of where the mark will go and how bad the mark is, and turns Scripture upside down 💥 Makes the mark of the beast less unique than the other physical marks recorded in Scripture by turning it into another surface-level imprint from stripes, a stamp-like or a skin thing level instead of something that can be implanted into an individual 💥 Creates another error by calling the False Prophet an "it" [a non-living object] instead of an "he" [a man], and the KJB correctly calls the False Prophet a "he" because the KJB records in Revelation 13 the False Prophet will be making false and counterfiet wonders of fire falling from heaven and be attempting to convince many men (before the mark will be pushed by the False Prophet to the world) to construct the image of the beast; Scripture consistently calls the False Prophet as a "he" in Revelation 13 [KJB], not an "it" [an object], such as in Revelation 13:12,13,14,15,16. 💥 And wrongly pushes and implies in the ESV's Revelation 13:16-17 that all people are somehow heretickally & Calvinistically a puppet on strings to somehow automically be taking the mark of the beast instead of being given a choice of whether to not receive or to receive the mark of the beast, like the KJB's Revelation 14:9-12 compared with 13:15-18 correctly shows as not recieving the mark of the beast and the saints will get persecited is what the saints' patience of not taking the mark of the beast and choosing to not apostatize from the faith is, by changing "he causeth all,...to receiue a marke in their right hand, or in their foreheads:" into "Also it causes all, ... to be marked on the right hand or the forehead". 💥 Furthermore, the "in" word of the KJB, not the "on" word of the ESV, implies that implantable technologies that could go inside one's body have had to be created & developed first in order for the mark of the beast to subsequently come about and eventually will be enforced at the start of the Great Tribulation by Second Beast/the False Prophet on the behalf of the First Beast of Revelation 13, the Antichrist when the Antichrist starts making war on the saved people/the saints throughout the whole world/the whole earth. How To Utilize the King James Bible vs What To Do To The Modern "bible" Versions MORE Follow 📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚 @AntiModernVersions

𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖐 𝖔𝖋 𝕰𝖓𝖔𝖈𝖍

Refuting the claim that the Masoretic Text talks about the Preservation of People and NOT the Presevation of SCRIPTURE Would God leave Humanity without perfect words where they will be filled with doubt? Or will he fill them with a perfect message that cannot be tampered by the enemy? Let's look at the underlying Masoretic text of the KJB in Psalms 12:7. In this whole chapter we can see a clear pattern where in the Hebrew, the plural sense is being followed by its singular sense in succession. Why does it have to refer to perserving words and not people? Because a masculine PRONOUN was used here for a feminine word 𝕰𝖛𝖎𝖉𝖊𝖓𝖈𝖊 𝕺𝖋 𝕵𝖊𝖘𝖚𝖘 𝕬𝖓𝖉 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊

Even after seeing so much evidence in every way possible - biblically (supremely and most importantly) & historically & linguistically & comparatively - that points to the King James Bible as being God's preserved, translated, inspired, trustworthy, 100% accurate, perfect Word for those who speak and/or read and/or read in English, it is both truly unscholarly and very hard/ extremely hard to deny that the KJB/KJV/King James Bible is God's perfect, inspired, translated word/words for English speakers and readers and to not use the KJB Only as the English Bible translation to read and believe (of course, you can read Bibles in other languages too if you actually know or study them, just read ones that are from the Textus Receptus and/or the KJB depending on the availibility of such translations in various langauges). For anyone who left the KJB and stopped using the KJB, you can just come back today right now and start using the KJB and rereading it again. We will welcome you back (if you are sincere and are a saved person of course, and if you are not a sodomite symphatizer or a vile sodomite at all; thankfully most people are not reprobates and filthy sodomites/ Evil LGBTQ Pigs/sodomites/ sodomite dogs / sodomite beasts of the field). We know there may be some people out there who needed the above posts in order for them to return to the KJB, so you're very welcome for them and you can come back. How To Utilize the King James Bible MORE Follow 📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚 @AntiModernVersions

Billy Graham's "Evangelistic" Association/BGEA promoted 3 Lies (while Graham was alive, he's complict): 💥 1) Falsely claims Vaticanus+Sinaiticus are advantageous+reliable+"older=better": "modern translators have the advantage of using many older Greek manuscripts…

Famous Freemason Manly P. Hall is against and attacks King James I, the King James Bible, KJB Believers, and Christians. In Hall's “Asia in the Balance of the Scales” by Manly Palmer Hall, in Horizon: The Magazine of Useful and Intelligent Living, Spring, Volume 4, No. 1, April 1944, Manly P. Hall attacks KJB, King James I, & King James Bible Believers & promoted the strawman fallacy of the King James Bible being verbially dictated to King James I (which is false as King James I did not write KJB, which is from a line of preserved Hebrew & Greek manuscripts): "To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this. For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. What's wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." SOURCE

📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚

Billy Graham's "Evangelistic" Association/BGEA promoted 3 Lies (while Graham was alive, he's complict): 💥 1) Falsely claims Vaticanus+Sinaiticus are advantageous+reliable+"older=better": "modern translators have the advantage of using many older Greek manuscripts of the New Testament discovered..Most scholars consider these older manuscripts more reliable than the few later manuscripts available to those who translated the King James Bible."❌ 💥 2) Falsely claims KJB did not use lots of manuscripts BUT Erasmus, Stephanus, & Beza traveled through many European countries+recorded seeing+using many manuscripts in the notes of their Greek New Testament editions-used for the KJB & 💥 3) Claims there's no authoratative EnglishBibleTranslation: "It is..helpful to remember.., while King James authorized a particular translation for the Church of England in the 17th century, it is no more authoritative for us today than any other translation."❌ [ BEGA's "Is the King James Bible the only reliable Bible" ? ] MORE 𝕬𝕸𝐕

📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚

Piper says: "How can a pastor respectfully and lovingly move his congregation from the King James version to a better translation?" 🤡

📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚

📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚

📖 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 📚