NS Heathenry Exposed

𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐞𝐜𝐡: (Christianity provided the basis for the unification of all German tribes) We can be certain that this sentiment was expressed by Hitler when we compare it to other speeches that convey the exact same idea, such as HERE HERE and HERE. «The fact that it was nevertheless possible to slowly form larger state-like entities from these Germanic tribes is related, on the one hand, to the ongoing influence of the overwhelming presence of the Roman Empire and, secondly, to the penetration of Christianity. [...] Christianity offered for the first time a common basis that seemed suitable to overcome at least certain divergent tendencies. Above all, it gave these tribes a specific moral, ethical, and life law. [...] The Germanic state formation as such, however, WAS ONLY CONCEIVABLE BECAUSE CHRISTIANITY PROVIDED THE PREREQUISITES in terms of leadership of the people (Volksführung) upon which a state could then be established. Therefore, the following can be recognized here: 1- The foundation for the leadership of the people was the Christian one; the foundation for the leadership of the state was, in the end, naturally conditioned by individual occurrences in which Nordic-Germanic leadership ability and organizational skill were expressed to a particularly strong degree.» Source: BArch NS 11/28 Rede vor den Kriegsakademien in Berlin, 11. März 1939 p. 252-254 𝑵𝑺 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅

𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐇𝐈𝐁𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐎𝐂𝐂𝐔𝐋𝐓𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐀𝐑 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐒 𝐈𝐍 𝐏𝐔𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐂 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒 The Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda has issued the following order: «It is PROHIBITED TO PRESENT, in the course of public events, occult, spiritualistic, clairvoyant, telepathic, astrological, and similar performances, as well as hypnotic experiments. The artistic activity of sleight of hand is not included in this prohibition.» — Joseph Goebbels Source: Bundesarchiv BArch NS 6/334, p. 245 (June 13, 1941) 𝑵𝑺 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐡 ‘𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐨𝐥’: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝 (Reviewed by Mark Weber) «On 5 November 1937, Hitler called a few high officials together for a conference in the Reich Chancellery in Berlin: War Minister Werner von Blomberg, Army Commander Werner von Fritsch, Navy Commander Erich Raeder, Air Force Commander Hermann Göring, and Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath. Also present was Hitler’s Army adjutant, Colonel Count Friedrich Hossbach. Five days later, Hossbach wrote up an unauthorized record of the meeting based on memory. HE DID NOT TAKE NOTES DURING THE CONFERENCE. Hossbach claimed after the war that he twice asked Hitler to read the memorandum, but the Chancellor replied that he had no time. Apparently none of the other participants even knew of the existence of the Colonel’s conference record. Nor did they consider the meeting particularly important. A few months after the conference, Hossbach was transferred to another position. His manuscript was filed away with many other papers and forgotten. In 1943 German general staff officer Colonel Count Kirchbach found the manuscript while going through the file and made a copy for himself. Kirchbach left the Hossbach original in the file and gave his copy to his brother-in-law, Victor von Martin, for safe keeping. Shortly after the end of the war, Martin turned over this copy to the Allied occupation authorities, who used it to produce a substantially altered version for use as incriminating evidence at Nuremberg. Sentences such as those quoting Hitler as saying that “The German question can only be solved by force” were invented and inserted. But over all, the document presented at Nuremberg is less than half the length of the original Hossbach manuscript. Both the original written by Hossbach and the Kirchbach/Martin copy have completely (and conveniently) disappeared. [...] The important role of the fraudulent Hossbach protocol at the Nuremberg Tribunal is another damning confirmation of the illegitimate, show-trial character of this most extravagant judicial undertaking in history. [...] The document was crucial in condemning Göring, Neurath and Raeder for their roles in the “criminal conspiracy.” The spurious Hossbach protocol is all too typical of the kind of evidence used by the victorious Allies at Nuremberg to legitimize their judicial imprisonment and murder of defeated Germany’s leaders. [...] THERE IS NOW NO DOUBT THAT THE HOSSBACH PROTOCOL IS WORTHLESS AS A HISTORICAL DOCUMENT. After the war both Hossbach and Kirchbach declared that the U.S. prosecution version is quite different than the document manuscript they recalled. Hossbach also testified at Nuremberg that he could not confirm that the prosecution version corresponded completely with the manuscript he wrote in 1937. And in his memoirs, he admitted that in any case, Hitler did not outline any kind of “war plan” at the meeting. At Nuremberg, Göring, Raeder, Blomberg and Neurath all denounced the Hossbach protocol as a gross misrepresentation of the conference. [...] In 1968 Victor von Martin characterized the memorandum with these words: "The protocol presented at the Nuremberg court was put together in such a way as to totally change the meaning [of the original] and can therefore be characterized only as a crude forgery."» Source: The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1983 (Vol. 4, No. 3), pp. 372-375. NS Heathenry Exposed

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐒𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐇 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐔𝐌: 𝐀 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐘 «The so-called Hossbach version of the conference, which is supposed to have become one of the most celebrated documents of all time, was written several days after the event, and it could carry no weight in a normal court of law, even if an actual copy of this memorandum was available. Hossbach had been an opponent of Hitler and his system since 1934, and he was not averse to the employment of illegal and revolutionary means in eliminating Hitler. He was an ardent admirer of General Ludwig Beck, the German Chief of Staff, whose life he had once helped to save on the occasion of a cavalry accident. Beck was a determined foe of Hitler, and he was engaged in organizing opposition against the German Chancellor. Hossbach was naturally on the alert to provide Beck with every possible kind of propaganda material. Hitler was popular in Germany, and only extreme methods might be effective in opposing him. It would be the duty of every historian to treat the so-called Hossbach memorandum with reserve, even if it could be shown that the version introduced at Nuremberg was an authentic copy of the memorandum which Hossbach began to write on November 10, 1937 (he failed to recall later when he completed his effort). The fact is, however, that no copies of this original version have been located since World War II. The version introduced by the American Prosecution at Nuremberg, the only one extant, was said to be a copy made from the original version in late 1943 or early 1944, but Hossbach declared in a notarized affidavit on June 18, 1946, that he could not remember whether or not the Nuremberg copy corresponded to the original which he had made nearly nine years earlier. In other words, the sensational document, which was the primary instrument used in securing the conviction and execution of a number of Germany’s top leaders, has never been verified, and there is no reason to assume that it is authentic. Raeder explained that Hitler’s views, as expressed on November 5, 1937, offered no basis to conclude that any change in German foreign policy was about to take place, but the judges at Nuremberg, with the dubious help of an unconfirmed record, decided that Hitler had revealed unmistakably his unalterable intention to wage a war of criminal aggression. Fritsch and Blomberg were dead when this conference was investigated after World War II, but Neurath and Göring agreed with Raeder about the essential nature of Hitler’s remarks. Hitler had discussed German aspirations in Central Europe and the danger of war, but this was certainly a very different thing than announcing an intention to pursue a reckless foreign policy or to seek a war. Even the alleged Hossbach memorandum introduced at Nuremberg, as A.J.P. Taylor has pointed out, does not anticipate any of the actual events which followed in Europe during 1938 and 1939. It does contain some offensive and belligerent ideas, but it outlines no specific actions, and it establishes no time tables. Hence, error had been added to error. It was false to assume that the document was authentic in the first place, and it was incorrect to assume that the fraudulent document contained any damaging evidence against Hitler and the other German leaders. Unfortunately, most of the later historians in Germany and elsewhere have blindly followed the Nuremberg judgment and have arrived at the mistaken conclusion that Hitler’s conference of November 5, 1937, was relevant to the effort of determining the responsibility for World War II.» Source: Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Institute for Historical Review, 1989, pp. 51-52. NS Heathenry Exposed

Information on the Hossbach Memorandum which was a note compiled by Colonel Count Friedrich Hossbach of a secret meeting between Hitler and his top military and political leadership on the 5 November 1937. Although this document speaks concerns relating to the war, Friedrich Hossbach notes down something interesting that Hitler stated during that meeting: "It was only the disintegrating effect of Christianity, and the symptoms of age which appear in every country, which caused ancient Rome to succumb to the onslaught of the Germans." — Adolf Hitler Source: BArch, RW8/18, Bl. 2-8. [Kopie. Niederschrift der Besprechung in der Reichskanzlei am 5. Nov. 1937 ( Hoßbach-Niederschrift )] p.4 [Bundesarchiv] Full English Translation @NSHeathenry

NS Heathenry Exposed pinned Deleted message

NS Heathenry Exposed pinned «Long time no post»

Long time no post

𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘 𝐀𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐂 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘 «From the sum of these processes arises the historical concept of the "Migration of Peoples", which overthrows the ancient world. There is a danger of chaotic conditions occurring. But a common foundation of life in the ancient world prevents this process. It is the uniform foundation of life that Christianity created on the soil of the entire ancient world. On this BASIS ALONE is the formation of a great Germanic Reich possible. This is the GREATEST MERIT OF CHRISTIANITY, the effect of which continues to this day. Strong personalities build the Reich on this basis, as the foundation of their politics. It is a sign of great narrow-mindedness to call a Charlemagne "the slaughterer of Saxons," who, on the basis of his policy of Christianity, forcibly imposed this policy on those who resisted. He had to act this way. Certainly, the loss of the best German blood in the process is regrettable.» Source: Bundesarchiv BArch RH 26-10/255, p. 68 NS Heathenry Exposed

National Socialism is NOT an Enemy of the Roman Catholic Church «National Socialism has proven that it is happy to grant the Church what the Church claims. The National Socialist government concluded a Concordat with the Roman Catholic Church very soon after its takeover of power. It regulated relations between the two, stated rights and duties, and granted the Church wide-ranging privileges. It did this with confidence that the Church would respect the Concordant and give clerics firm guidelines to stay away from any political activity, to be loyal to the National Socialist government, and not to stick their noses in things that are not their concern and that they do not understand. [...] No National Socialist has the intention or the wish to unleash a new battle intended to alienate the German Catholic from his faith and Church.» Source: Aufklärungs- und Redner-Informationsmaterial der Reichspropagandaleitung der NSDAP., Lieferung 20 (August 1935), pp. 1- 7 (Kirche: Polit. Katholizismus). 𝑵𝑺𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅

𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏: 𝐋𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 «Through Luther, the German people have made the most important contribution to the history of recent centuries. The Reformation is a world-historical event. For us Germans, however, it is and remains an event of special, unique rank. The entire tragedy and greatness of our people's destiny revolves around the names of Luther and Wittenberg. Luther and his deed do not BELONG to one part of our people, but to the entire people. To separate oneself from him means to separate oneself from our past; to abandon him means to surrender him to the [religious] denominations, to which neither their love nor their hate belongs: THE MAN OF GERMAN DESTINY. It is our task to recognize the Luther of the Germans, to free the true face of the man and his deed from the denominational overpainting and to show him in his 'Germanness'.» Source: NSDAP Der Schulungsbrief - November 1936 #10 p.389/390 (Official NSDAP literature) 𝑵𝑺 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅

𝐀𝐥𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐚 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐲-𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 «ROSENBERG was interrogated principally with regard to an alleged thirty-point program he had published in October 1941 for the National Reich Church (a church to be set up by the German State). ROSENBERG could not recall having published any such program nor could he recall any of the points therein as presented to him. He stated that he had been opposed to what he called "confessional churches" for many years and had included a chapter in his book "The Myth of the 20th Century". He further stated, however, that he had done nothing to implement his opposition to churches nor had he made any recommendations for legislation which adversely affected churches.» Source: Interrogation of Alfred Rosenberg On November 16, 1945 by Lt. Col Thomas S. Hinkel. [Unfortunately I could not find the transcript for this, as I don’t think it is publicly available yet. However part of the document can be found on the Cornell school archives.]

4: "THE NATIONAL REICH CHURCH OF GERMANY IS DETERMINED TO EXTERMINATE irrevocably and BY ANY MEANS the FOREIGN CHRISTIAN FAITHS imported into germany in the ill-omened year 800." 18: "The National Church will clear away from its altars ALL CRUCIFIXES, BIBLES AND PICTURES OF SAINTS." 30: "On the day of its foundation, THE CHRISTIAN CROSS MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL CHURCHES, CATHEDRALS AND CHAPELS and it must be superseded by the ONLY UNCONQUERABLE SYMBOL, THE SWASTIKA." http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/psf/box31/a296p06.html

📚𝐃𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐨𝐧: 𝐀 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐞𝐢𝐧 𝐊𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐟, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐃𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐨𝐧'𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐢𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐞. The passage discussed is from Book 2: Chapter 5 called "Weltanschauung (Worldview) and Organization". The Chapter starts on page 511 in the Stalag edition, and page 509 in the Datlon's translation: 1. Dalton's translation changes the concept of "symptom" to "embody" to try subtly suggest to the user that Christianity "is" judaism, which isn't in the original text and has no basis in history. 2. Dalton adds the phrase "Foreign to Human Nature", and changes "Feeling of Uneasiness" to "Deeply regrettable fact" to create a more negative bias toward Christianity in Hitler's frank description of the ancient world. 3. Removes "Ardent Spirit", which is a positive term, changes "first occasion of Spiritual Terror" to "the first spiritual terror". × All credit goes to TotalSpiritualWar × 𝑵𝑺 𝑯𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅