tgindex
CA/CMA/CS Vacancies for Job/Training/Internship

CA/CMA/CS Vacancies for Job/Training/Internship

Статистика
@CA_Club_Articleshipанглийский

📘 CA Students Vacancy & Training : Your Gateway to Articleship, Internship & CA Career Opportunities 🎯 Connecting CA Students with Top Firms & Industry Openings 💼 Articleship | Industrial Training | Job Vacancies

Последний пост
17 авг.
Последнее чтение
13 авг.
Постов за неделю
1
Всего постов
35
Тип
открытый
Язык
английский
В каталоге с
13 авг.
Подписчики
2 248
+10 за 5 дн.
Сутки
+1
+0,04%
Неделя
 
Месяц
 
Просмотров на пост
511
35 постов
Вовлечённость
22,7%
к подписчикам
Постов в день
0,1
всего 35
Упоминаний
0
каналов
Охват размещения
оценка
1/24сутки в ленте
81
1/48двое суток
92
1/72трое суток
100

Оценка по просмотрам недавних постов: пост набирает почти всё за первые сутки.

Посты

  • *Departmental GST Audit is Not the Place to Sleep on Your Case* One thing I have consistently observed in GST litigation is that many cases become difficult not because of the Show Cause Notice, but because of the way the audit was handled. By the time the SCN is issued, the Department already has: * Your documents, * Your reconciliations, * Your explanations, * Your admissions (if any), * And a detailed audit observation. What surprises me is that many audit observations which appear very strong at the audit stage often do not survive detailed legal scrutiny. In fact, I have seen several audit paras getting dropped at the adjudication stage itself because: ✔ Facts were not properly appreciated during audit. ✔ Documents were not presented in the correct manner. ✔ Legal provisions were not explained adequately. ✔ The issue was accepted prematurely without examining the complete position. Audit is the Foundation of Litigation Many taxpayers believe: “Let’s wait for the SCN. We will fight later.” In my view, that is a mistake. The strongest opportunity to shape the case is often during the audit itself. A well-handled audit can: * Clarify facts, * Eliminate misunderstandings, * Reduce allegations, * And sometimes prevent issuance of a major demand altogether. My Experience A significant number of audit observations initially appear valid prima facie. However, when facts are arranged properly and the law is examined carefully, the picture often changes completely. That is why handling a departmental audit is not merely a compliance exercise. It is the first stage of litigation strategy. Key Takeaway Many GST disputes are won or lost long before the Show Cause Notice is issued. If the audit stage is mishandled, the litigation becomes defensive. If the audit stage is handled properly, the adjudication stage becomes much easier. Never treat a GST Audit as a document submission exercise. Treat it as the foundation of your future litigation strategy. – CA Gaurav K. Gupta GST Litigation & Departmental Audit Advisory

  • GST Departmental Audit Room Discussion: Is IGST Credit Restricted Merely Because the Place of Supply is Different? https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • AI Can Draft. A Litigator Builds the Case… https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • без подписи

  • Dream of every CA https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbdQO1coXxV/?igsh=MTBoZTViYWc3cmRpcw==

  • Three Supreme Court Judgments Every GST Practitioner Must Know: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • *“There Was No Suppression… Only a Difference in Interpretation.”* One of the most common allegations I come across during GST litigation is: “The taxpayer suppressed facts with an intention to evade tax.” It sounds serious. But here’s what happened in one of my matters. The department invoked the extended limitation period alleging suppression of facts. There’s a big difference between: * Concealing facts, and * Taking a legal view that the department later disagrees with. Unfortunately, the words “suppression of facts with intent to evade tax” are often used mechanically in notices. But law requires much more than a mere allegation. My Take: Whenever you receive a GST notice alleging suppression, don’t get intimidated by the language. First ask: * What fact has allegedly been suppressed? * Was the information already available in returns, books, or departmental records? * Is it truly suppression, or merely a legal dispute? Many cases become much stronger once you separate facts from allegations. In GST litigation, labels don’t decide the case. Evidence does. Have you ever received a notice alleging “suppression of facts” even though everything was disclosed in your returns?

  • без подписи

  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cagauravkgupta_newbeginnings-officeinauguration-growthjourney-ugcPost-7486368392845737984-fxRN

  • 🎉 A New Chapter Begins! With immense gratitude and excitement, we are delighted to share that the Opening Ceremony of our New Office was successfully held. We sincerely thank our clients, mentors, friends, family members, and well-wishers for their gracious presence, blessings, and unwavering support. Your trust is our greatest strength and inspires us to serve with even greater dedication. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbHv5fNoZ0f/?igsh=cHBlYWZjcW10cHNr

  • Vendor’s GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively… Now the Department Wants You to Reverse ITC? https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • *Are You Facing a Departmental GST Audit?* Here’s one of my experiences while handling a departmental GST audit. *Audit Observation: Corporate Guarantee Commission in Balance sheet notes* The department raised an audit observation alleging that GST was payable on a corporate guarantee extended to a related party. Before diving into legal provisions, circulars, or case laws, I always verify the facts. On examining the records in detail, I found that the audit observation itself was factually incorrect. The transaction relied upon by the department did not even fall within the scope of the alleged issue. Since the very foundation of the audit objection was incorrect, the question of examining its legal sustainability did not arise. Key Takeaway Before arguing the law, verify the facts. Many audit observations can be resolved at the threshold by demonstrating that the transaction itself is outside the scope of the proposed objection. A practical approach to handling departmental audits: * ✔️ Verify the underlying facts. * ✔️ Check whether the observation is actually applicable. * ✔️ Only then examine the legal provisions, notifications, circulars, and judicial precedents. In GST litigation, facts are the foundation. If the facts are wrong, the legal debate often becomes unnecessary. Have you come across an audit objection where the department’s observation itself was factually incorrect? I’d be interested to hear your experience. #GST #DepartmentalAudit #GSTAudit #CorporateGuarantee #GSTLitigation #IndirectTax #TaxProfessionals #GSTCompliance #CharteredAccountant CA Gaurav K. Gupta 8560028423 Jaipur

  • *A Recovery Notice from the GST Department forwarded by the Bank… Without Seeing Any GST Notice?* Recently handled a case where the taxpayer first came to know about GST proceedings only after receiving a letter from the bank stating that it had received a recovery communication from the department. There was no ASMT-10, no DRC-01A, no DRC-01 visible to the taxpayer, and no order was known to them. The matter pertained to the Bengaluru State GST Department. The first step was to immediately obtain copies of the notices and order from the jurisdictional office. Further verification revealed that: * The notices had been sent to the registered email ID. * The registered email belonged to an old employee who had left the organization. * Since the mailbox was no longer being monitored, the communications went unnoticed. * As a result, the proceedings continued ex parte, ultimately leading to recovery action. The matter is now under challenge before the Commissioner (Appeals). Key takeaway for every GST registered person: ✔️ Regularly monitor your registered email ID. ✔️ Update your mobile number and email ID immediately whenever there is a change in personnel. ✔️ Periodically check the GST portal for notices and orders. Today, GST compliance is largely portal and electronic communication driven. Missing an email can sometimes mean missing the opportunity to respond before recovery proceedings begin. If you’re facing a similar situation or have received a recovery communication without being aware of the underlying proceedings, feel free to reach out. Every case depends on its own facts, but timely action can make a significant difference. #GST #GSTLitigation #GSTAppeal #TaxLitigation #IndirectTax #GSTCompliance #CharteredAccountant #TaxProfessionals #RecoveryProceedings #GSTPortal CA Gaurav K. Gupta 8560028423 Jaipur

  • без подписи

  • 🚨 GSTAT Advisory: Facing Issues While Filing Appeal? Generate Your Token Before 31 July 2026 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • No Fresh Pre-Deposit Required if Earlier Deposit Exceeds Tribunal Requirement After Appellate Relief: GSTAT In a significant relief for taxpayers, the GSTAT, Cuttack Bench has held that no additional statutory pre-deposit is required for filing an appeal before the Tribunal where the pre-deposit already made at the first appellate stage exceeds the amount required after the tax demand has been substantially reduced by the First Appellate Authority. The Bench comprising Ms. Suchismita Misra (Judicial Member) and Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sahoo (Technical Member) observed that once the statutory requirement stands substantially complied with through the earlier deposit, insisting on a fresh pre-deposit would serve no legal purpose. Accordingly, the Registry was directed to verify the earlier pre-deposit and list the appeal for admission upon payment of the balance court fee. Key Takeaway: Taxpayers filing appeals before GSTAT should carefully evaluate the amount already deposited during earlier appellate proceedings. Where such deposit exceeds the statutory pre-deposit required on the reduced demand, this ruling provides strong support against any insistence on an additional pre-deposit. CA Gaurav K. Gupta 8560028423 Jaipur

  • без подписи

  • 📢 Vacancy for 10 CA Article / Intern – Sanjive Radhey & Co A well established 25 years old Chartered Accountancy firm, is looking for dedicated and enthusiastic CA Articles / Interns to join our professional team. 📍 Location: Jaipur/Alwar/Udaipur/Kota -Raj. 🕒 Position: CA Article / Intern 🧾 Areas of Exposure: GST Compliance and litigation & Returns, Income Tax Filings & Audits, TDS, Accounting & ROC Compliances, Statutory and Internal Audits, Financial Statements & MIS Reporting, Bank Audit, Concurrent Audit, Forensic Audit. 🎯 What We Offer: Practical exposure to multiple domains of finance & taxation Supportive learning environment Opportunity to grow with a dynamic team Stipend: depending upon interview (Minimum as per ICAI) 📧 To Apply: Send your CV at gkv1995@gmail.com or contact 8560028423

  • Update : Recent Circular of Rajasthan State Tax. Here's Why Every Taxpayer Should Pay Attention: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I

  • “Three Hours in a GST Audit Room… Here’s Why It Was Worth Every Minute.” https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6n1QWKwqSY87e5D30I