BAYT-UL-ABYĀT (HOME OF VERSES)

📣 NEW AUDIO •┈••✦••┈• 📑 The Correct Islamic Position Regarding Mawlid Nabiyy Celebration •┈••✦••┈• 🎙️ Abū Anwar an-Naijiriyy 🔗 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12575 ➡️ Yoruba

📍 Coming Up Today (ان شاء الله ) 🗒️ Topic : The Correct Islamic Position Regarding Mawlid Nabiyy Celebration 🎙️ Speaker : Abū Anwar an-Naijiriyy ⏰ Time : After Jumu’ah 14th August, 2026 Venue : Ìdí Ọ̀gẹ̀dẹ̀ Central Mosque, Olunlade, Ilorin 📡 Listen LIVE@ t.me/SalafiYoruba Share far and wide to family and friends!!!

📑 New Upload Refuting Some Of The Doubts Of The Misguided Deceiver Who Permits The Celebration Of The Prophet's Birthday Written by: Shaykh Abū Isḥāq Al-Hilālī Al-Marzūqī حفظه الله Read article here ⤵️ https://wp.me/pdrhyL-1iH

What Scholars Of Islam Said Regarding Mawlid Celebration 🗣️Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Al-Fawzān حفظه اللّٰه 🗣️Shaykh Ibn Bāz رحمه اللّٰه 🗣️Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Al-Luḥaydān رحمه اللّٰه 🗣️Shaykh Ibn ʿUthaymīn رحمه اللّٰه

How do they rejoice and celebrate the day the prophet ﷺ died?! 🎙️ Shaykh Muneer As Sa'diy Al ‘Adaniy 📜 Ar Risaalah Publications

📘 NEW PDF 📄 A Witness From Their Own Family: Exposing the Inconsistencies of ‘ Ali Al-Hudhayfi' and Abu ‘Iyād 🖊 Written by: Mubārak Ismail The Fitnah of Nizār and Co. has brought many sudden and surprising developments with it. Among the most surprising developments is seeing people reject the very principles the Salafis have historically been upon, principles that they themselves had previously practiced and taught, simply to aid their own whims and desires. ➤ Their own statements expose the contradiction. 📎 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12570

#مجموع_فتاوى (المجموعة الثانية ) السؤال: السادس والستون (٦٦) ما حكم من يقول أن هرقل كافر ؟

#مجموع_فتاوى (المجموعة الثانية ) السؤال: الثالث والثمانون (٨٣) هل يجب على الزوجة أن تصل أرحام زوجها ؟

📍 Coming Up This Friday 🗒️ Topic : The Correct Islamic Position Regarding Mawlid Nabiyy Celebration 🎙️ Speaker : Abū Anwar an-Naijiriyy ⏰ Time : After Jumu’ah 14th August, 2026 Venue : Ìdí Ọ̀gẹ̀dẹ̀ Central Mosque, Olunlade, Ilorin 📡 Listen LIVE@ t.me/SalafiYoruba _Share far and wide to family and friends!!!_

Inactive in Truth, Energized in Falsehood Al-'Allamah 'Abdullah Al-Bukhārī حفظه الله

📘 NEW PDF The Traits & Tendencies of the Defenders & Followers of Amjad Rafiq (Abu Iyaad of Salafi Publications) The Fitnah of Amjad Rafiq has exposed and highlighted the realities and traits of his blind followers and defenders, which expose that they are not upon the truth, nor upon evidence and clarity. They are just a bunch of yes-men and bootlickers who utilize several intimidation tactics to silence those who refute their leader and expose his misguidance 🖊️ Abū Anwar An-Naijīriyy 🔗 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12528

📹 NEW VIDEO ⚠️ Refuting the Deceptive Claim of "Returning to the Quran" to Evade the Scholars | Sh. Fuad Az-Zintānĩ Download here: https://t.me/rpubschannel/12525 📡 Follow the “Gatherings of Knowledge” on t.me/rpubschannel ━───✨✦📚✦✨───━

There is this Manchester-based 50 year old adult yet a "boy", Abdullah Jallow who seems to have no knowledge or skill except to insult and to proudly announce his age at any chance. Oh, and to announce his 25/30 years of following his masters around, with no observable traces of knowledge nor any respect for the people of knowledge except his masters. ​I have realized that this individual mistakes the way noble people ignore his unruly behavior and sharp tongue as him presenting "evidence" and "harsh truths." But no! It is merely prattling, babbling, and a display of his lack of religious knowledge and basic common sense. ​Regarding your question: "Where is the evidence for the Tabdee' against Abu 'Iyād?" ​Firstly, I haven't seen any authentic chain of transmission clearly stating that Sh. 'Arafāt declared him to be an innovator. ​Secondly, even if it is established that he was truly declared an innovator, why is it such a big deal? When a person opposes the foundational beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah, he is declared a mubtadi'. ​Or are you unaware that Abu 'Iyād claimed that disputes between duaat should not be referred back to the scholars? Even after people of knowledge corrected him, he remained stubbornly devoted to this false principle and continued to defend it! ​Moreover, if we are talking about false tabdī', is there anyone more guilty of it than you and your ilk? Nizār branded everyone who does not support his transgressions as "Hizb Jadeed" and has repeated this several times. Do you care to ask him for his evidence for that? ​He branded Sh. Salāh Kantūsh a Hizbī and Shaykh Ahmad Bādukhūn a Haddādi. Where is his evidence for this tabdī'? ​Fawwāz al-Madkhali branded everyone who does not follow them as "Sūfiyyatul Bukhāri." What was his evidence for that? ​The uncaptured thief is now trying to arrest the farmer. You and your ilk are the ones who have branded Salafis with false tabdī' countless times, yet you still shed crocodile tears to present yourselves as the victims. Mr. Jallow, fear Allah. ​The description of him being a "plant" is highly fitting for anyone who divides the Muslims and tries to turn them away from their scholars, just as Abu 'Iyād is doing. A person who divides the Salafis because his ego prevents him from retracting an error he was refuted for is surely a plant of Shaytān! ​Lastly, 'Ali Al-Hudhayfi and Abu 'Iyād have been falsely branding Sh. 'Arafāt a "plant" for a while now- why didn't we see all this crying from you then? ​If you continue to disrespect those who are teaching and defending the Deen of Allah, the people of Sunnah will not stand by and let you cause mischief on the earth. ​Mubārak Ismail

📘 NEW PDF Fawwāz al-Madkhalī Clarifies the Error of Their Kurdish Group and Their Misunderstanding of the Ḥadīth of Dhāt Anwāṭ Written by: Shaykh ʿAbdul-Bāsiṭ al-Mashhadānī (May Allah preserve him) ➤ Translated by: Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf 📎 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12510 Abū Iyāḍ, while defending Dānā ʿAbd Allāh, accused Shaykh ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī of misrepresenting the issue of Dhāt Anwāṭ. However, Fawwāz al-Madkhalī—whom they consider one of their scholars—stated that their Kurdish group was mistaken and misunderstood the ḥadīth. Why the inconsistency, either Dānā ʿAbd Allāh was wrong, as Fawwāz said, or he was correct, as Abū Iyāḍ’s defence suggests. If he was wrong, then why is Shaykh ʿArafāt’s criticism of that mistake called “misrepresentation,” “distortion,” or “pseudo-scholarship”?

🔉NEW AUDIO 🔹Lecture Title: Campaigns And Election on the Scale of Kitab And Sunnah 🎙Speakers: • Abū Kawthar Luqmān • Abū Muhsinah Mubarak 📲 Listen and Download here: https://t.me/markazussunnahng/5960

#جديــد ↲ جهالات وضلالات نزار السوداني في تقرير عقيدة أهل السنة في أسماء الله تعالى 🖋️ بقلم فضيلة الشيخ الدكتور: عرفات بن حسن المحمدي حفظه الله تعالى 🗓 ١٨صفر ١٤٤٨هـ 🔗 https://t.me/Arafatbinhassan

📘 NEW PDF The Ruling on One Who Says Those Involved in the Incident of Dhāt Anwāṭ Should Not Be Referred to as "Companions" 🖊️Answered by: Shaykh Mustafa Mabram (حفظه الله) 📄Translated by: Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf 📎 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12504 Some individuals have claimed that those involved in the incident of Dhāt Anwāṭ should not be referred to as “Companions.” In this beneficial clarification, Shaikh Mustafa Mabram — may Allāh preserve him — explains the ruling concerning this statement and clarifies the correct position regarding those who witnessed the incident.

💥 NEW AUDIO 💥 💽 A Piece of Advice to Those Who are Still Deceived by Ejigbo and His Followers - 01 🎙 Abū Anwar an-Naijirī & Abū Kawthar Luqmān Language:Yoruba https://t.me/rpubschannel/12501

° 🎥【محاضرة بعنوان 】 ⇣ 🔸↲ 《 التحذير من التعصب المقيت 》 ▪️الشيخ الفاضل : 🎙أبو سليمان فؤاد الزنتاني حفظه الله 📲 https://t.me/rpubschannel/12498 📮https://youtu.be/f68ugRfPFRw °