RP Classics

Ceuta: Rodearon el campamento de los santos y la ciudad amada And they went up over the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. And fire came down from God out of heaven and devoured them. — Re 20:9

the stars will be our paradise

$1 vs $100,000,000 Archetype of Wotan

Interpretatio Romana: An ancient Roman practice of identifying foreign deities with equivalent Roman gods; under the assumption that polytheistic cultures across Europe and the Mediterranean were fundamentally worshiping the same gods, just by different names. First coined by Tacitus [Germania 43] who identified the German god to be Mercury [Germania 9] and Romans apply to Greek Hermes [Hyginus Fabulae 143]. Mercury would be used for Odin-equivalents until the 6th century. This Interpretatio Romana tradition was also preserved in Acts, where the Greeks of Lystra identified Saint Paul to be Ἑρμῆν after he performed a miracle: “And they called — Paul, Mercurius (Hermes)” The Romans identified Mercury 🇮🇹 to be: Odin 🇳🇴 Wotan 🇩🇰 Wodan 🇩🇪 Lugus 🇫🇷 Thoth 🇪🇬 and Saint Paul ✝️; and all to be the same figure. Paul is no god and only performed his miracle by the power of Jesus Christ; it is however an interesting thought that Saint Paul was the only archetype of Odin that actually historically existed.

Vegvisir: All Roads Lead To Christ: The Origins of the Vegvisir found commonly in neo-paganism. Name: —comes from the Icelandic Grimoire “Galdrakver” in 1868ad Akureyri; never used prior. Symbol: —rendition of Solomon's Sigil, specifically from the Icelandic Grimoire “Huld manuscript” in 1860ad Akureyri; labelled Solomon's Sigil within the Grimoire and very similar to earlier English variations of Solomon's Sigil. Read more in image. History of poor research, verification and allure to unsubstantiated memes, has over the past 40 years popularised and propagated the myth of this symbol as anything related to Viking (separated by over 850 years).

Nisi Vobis? If Not You: “If it is not us, it will be no-one.” RE: — Pope Urban II's ᴬᴰ1095 Council of Clermont Speech — Which Way White Man? — No One Is Coming To Save Us — In Christ, the White Man Conquers — Long Live The Empire Read Disclaimer: Positive action can only be legal, peaceful and political. Change occurs by exercising power, not with destructive tantrums. An old favourite Telegram VN with such a powerful message of self-resolve, that reminds me of Urban's speech each time I hear it. So I've paired them together for you.

Ancestral God: Despite romanticisations of simple obscure localised mystified naturalist fables being the ideal for our ancestral faith and God; the Christian God has been that for all living memory. Experiencing unfathomable circumstances in this period. Europeans have been Christian much before: —Inca Empire —Aztec Empire —Maori New Zealand settlement —Zulu South Africa migration —Horses introduced to America —English, German, Spanish and French (etc) languages (crafted from Christian influence) —All modern European ethnicities —Icelandic settlement —Germanic settlement of British Isles —North/ South American, African and Australian settlement —White man landing on the moon Through all of this, we worshipped our ancestral God: Jesus Christ.

Have Children: RE: Please take the time to check previous great posts on the topic. —What it means to be a Puritan —Manifest Destiny —Never lose sight —Which way White man? —Where's yours? —Where are you? —Work towards it —Hope and Future —Stop making excuses —Tobit 4:12 —Ghost Beach —Non TFR —TFR Change —5 Year Plan —Be Fruitful and Multiply —Demographics is Destiny —Christian Fertility Success —Replacement Fertility —Consolidation Caveat —You are the only obstacle —Fertility Windows —Conquer it Again —Oriental TFR —Lean into it —Demography —Race Suicide —Roman Christian Success —Hispanic TFR —Population Forecast —Six Generations —Amish TFR —Oriental Immigration —Do Your Part —Billion White Americans —Japanese Open Borders —Obedient Son —14 Words —Non TFR to Zero —Net Fertility Rate Not only is it a duty to our people, it fulfills and brings you joy.

Surrexit Dominus Vere. Truly the Lord has risen. Luke 24:34

Idiom Lost: RE: Most Misunderstood Story (4 parts). A common Old Testament contention is when king Saul demands a dowry of 100 Philistine foreskins and David delivers 200, to marry his daughter Michal. Due to modern sensitivities, many are squeamish to the idea of anatomical collection, especially of the given appendage. However it's not an issue even if literal: collecting proof of kills that the enemy have and your people don't. This however isn't quite what it seems. If we look at the parallel text Josephus Antiquities 6:197,203. 7:25 the Greek instead says "heads". Supporting this was understood as an idiom equivocal to the common idiom "collect 200 heads/ scalps" denoting a required count rather than collection (US literally paid to scalp Amerindians). Given this, we are considering using stipraeputia (stipendium praeputia) to signal the intended semantic of a countable martial tally, whilst preserving the literal speech. Giving range for literal (foreskin), euphemistic (head) and figurative (tally).

☦️ The Most Misunderstood Story You may have seen the plethora of memes from pagans talking about David "stealing" the Philistine's foreskins (1 Sam. 18:25-27). I will present to you the most compelling argument that using "foreskins" there is a mistranslation…

☦️ The Most Misunderstood Story IV Josephus in his Antiquities mentions David taking heads, not foreskins, five times (Ant. 6.197, 6.203, 7.25)*. This doesn't have to be Josephus' hiding the truth. The Greeks (who he wrote for) were not moral puritans about this type of stuff, the Israelites were. There's three chapters going extensively over sexual purity laws in Leviticus (Lev. 18-20). Some insist that Saul's request for foreskins was gruesome and gross precisely to scare David off. Yet again, this makes no sense considering David returned with 200. Then you might say this was the only way Philistines and Israelites could be differentiated, that's why foreskins had to be collected. But evidently, Philistines could be separated from Israelites (1 Sam. 17:26, 17:36). This argument also doesn't account for the fact it could be anyone's foreskin. Or that there was no separation of foreskin from the penis with Israelite circumcision. A foreskin also doesn't even imply a killing blow. The last one, a bit less common, suggests that it was a sort of humiliation of the Philistines for not having the practice of circumcision. But if humiliation of the Philistines was the goal, why give such a glorious act to David? Instead, the most logical and simple answer is that David was requested to bring back 100 heads. David, having no actual army, maybe a small group of supporters, were outnumbered. Saul hoped this would kill David. But David returned with 200 heads and embarrassed him. Lastly, 1 Sam 29:4 is an oddity for those who follow the mainstream translation. The Philistines remark that David would take their heads to Saul to make up with him — why not mention the foreskins? Wouldn't it be notable enough to associate with David? *Not a comprehensive citation 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐰𝐧

☦️ The Most Misunderstood Story III We see many instances in 1 and 2 Samuel of the Philistines being called uncircumcised in a derogatory manner (1 Sam. 14:6, 17:26, 17:36, 31:4, 2 Sam. 1:20, 1 Chron. 10:4) and outside of Samuel in Judges (Judg. 14:3, 15:18). The excessive citations are to prove a point: being uncircumcised was bad in the eyes of the Israelites and grounds to be made fun of. When Israelites took war trophies, they were heads (Judg. 7:25). In fact, when David killed Goliath (1 Sam. 17:51) and when the son of Saul was killed (2 Sam. 4:8), both times the heads were cut off! All of this is to say that Saul's request of foreskins would be a very weird concept to David. Yet his hesitation or confusion was never mentioned. And again, circumcision was different. David would have understood anatomically what Saul wanted, but this would be an entirely foreign idea. That makes the idea that David returned with 200 foreskins even less likely. But if it were heads, there's no issue. The word orlah in 1 Sam. 18:25-27 was just a way to refer to the Philistines as a group as uncircumcised. Grammatically, the Hebrew simply says 'the orlot of the Philistines,' referring to something associated with the uncircumcised Philistines. It doesn’t have to be foreskins. In unpointed Hebrew, עָרְלָה (arla, “foreskin”) and עָרֶפָּה (arepa, “neck”) differ only by two consonants (ל vs. פ) and vowel pointing. It could've been a scribal error. → NEXT 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐰𝐧

☦️ The Most Misunderstood Story II We must first understand what word is being used for "foreskin" here. That is "orlah" (6190)[1] which means "foreskin" or "[a state of being] uncircumcised". It doesn't primarily mean foreskin. That's what lexicons will tell you but they're wrong. You can check every time the word is used in the Bible and it only means foreskin if the context makes it obvious, or if there's a preceding word like "basar" (1320)[2] meaning "flesh". The primary meaning is metaphorical. The Greek equivalent ἀκροβυστία[3], used in the Septuagint and New Testament, also follows this pattern. The only instance of it actually meaning a literal foreskin is in Col. 2:13, where τῆς σαρκὸς ("of the flesh") is added to clarify. You might ask why the Vulgate translated orlah as præputia then[4] — a purely anatomical version of orlah. The issue comes from Jerome. Jerome translated the Bible into Latin, what would be called the Latin Vulgate. When he did so, he consulted the Septuagint — a prior Greek translation — and some scholars of Hebrew. As I explained in an earlier post, circumcision became very different after the Bar Kokhba revolt. Jerome likely assumed that this rabbinic practice reflected the original Israelite tradition, and carried this misunderstanding directly into his translation. As a result, ambiguous covenantal terms like orlah were locked into a purely anatomical reading (præputia). → NEXT 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐰𝐧

☦️ The Most Misunderstood Story You may have seen the plethora of memes from pagans talking about David "stealing" the Philistine's foreskins (1 Sam. 18:25-27). I will present to you the most compelling argument that using "foreskins" there is a mistranslation, a very long-standing one, and that David actually was taking their heads. → BEGIN 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐰𝐧

KJNV— Project: When completed, will be the first full CI bible ever produced; containing: Old Testament, Apocrypha & New Testament. In both Latin & English: providing a textual basis to translate into other languages and preserve a textual/ semantic benchmark for far future English revisions. Modelled on the Nova Vulgata: indexation, book inclusion, textual inclusion, variant selection & semantic choices based on the KJV, have heavily revised the Latin. Creating a textual basis that could reproduce the KJV whilst circumventing dated, obsolete & archaic English wording: once again making the racial elements of the bible visible again and preserving it in timeless Latin. Refrained from releasing a PDF throughout, until we're at a comfortable stage; which we are nearing. OT/AP is mostly complete and NT nearly fully refined (our goal for initial release). Live access to KJNV has been possible throughout with @cxbbot however. Comment words or verses for me to double check, to make sure we got it right!

Preterism— Against Jewish Fables of the End: RE: — Preterist Eschatology Timeline — Full Preterism — Partial Preterism — Orthodox Full Preterist Apologia — No One Is Coming To Save Us — Inherently Racist and Anti-semitic Channels: — @Preterism — @ApostolicNations — @RP_HQ Scripture: — Not heeding Jewish fables and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. [Titus 1:14] — False Christs and prophets will appear. Do not believe nor go to them. [Matthew 24:23-24; Mark 13:5-6; Luke 21:8] They're weaponising Historicist/ Futurist Eschatology to deceive White men to die for Israel in a secular war. This war is not about defending Christianity, it is not about defending Whites; these are not signs of the End-Times. It is a secular regional war about toppling the last major player between Israel and regional hegemony: paving the way to Israel as a global superpower. They will do and say ANYTHING to make you fight and die with religious zeal: as if the universe depends on it. Do not believe the Jewish fables.

Long Live The Empire: RE: — America's White Ethnoplanet Policy — Manifest Destiny — European Union: Project Europa — An Imperative — Infinite Habitat White survival is unity and expansion. 2 Maccabees 13:14 Committing himself therefore to the Creator of all the world, he exhorted his soldiers that they should fight valiantly even unto death for the laws, the church, the city, the fatherland, and the state, and he encamped around Modin. — Committens itaque omnium Creatori mundi, exhortatus suos milites, ut fortiter dimicarent usque ad mortem pro legibus, templo, civitate, patria, republica, circa Modin castra posuit.

Beasts of the Field: RE: Biblical Christian Identity: —Spiritual Israel —Triune God —Cain, a Son of Adam —Jewish Ethnogenesis —White Ethnogenesis —Biblical Genealogy —Who is Israel? Relevant Posts: —What is the Bible? —Biblical Geographic Extent —Pinnacle of Creation —Noahs White Sons —Arab ⁻² —Simian ⁻² —Troglodyte Another Trad-CI superstition that collapses under the slightest scrutiny. Unfortunately common claims by many non-Reformed-CI include: —claiming Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are two separate creation events, the former of which are Nons (6/8th Day Creationism). —claiming Beasts of the Field refer to Nons. Shown in the infographic: —the parallel between Genesis 1 and 2, demonstrating they are of the same event (Adam); akin to the retelling between Gospels. —the human behavioural references to Beasts of the Field, use a word specifically for quadruped animals and not ambiguously open to bipedal hominids; and don't connect to Genesis creation wording.

Timeline of Full Preterist Eschatology: Full sized image here; Notes here. Fides Et Gens, Inseparable.