CA Final with Ankush Chirimar Classes ♥️

Cover Professional Ethics LIVE With Me ❤️ Starting from Today in Our Exam Oriented Batch ✌️ Demo Lecture 3 https://www.youtube.com/live/Oo5u1kkGcLM?si=sett-bcJYuchRNCl LIVE at 8am, See you All ✨

ONLY 2:30 HOURS TO GO! Last chance to avail the discounts for Nov’26 Examinations! 🔥 ₹500 OFF on Live Question Bank Batch Coupon Code: BATCH500 Announcement: Watch Announcement 10% OFF on Handwritten Notes (₹299/-) Code: BOOKS5 Announcement: Watch Announcement 3rd Demo Lecture - Live Exam-Oriented Batch Topic: Professional Ethics Tomorrow - 8:00 AM 📢 Announcement Link: Watch Announcement Your Audit ~ My Responsibility ❤️ We are in this together ❤️

For Those getting All Answers Correct 🙌❤️

Score for the day 1? (considering 2 marks for each MCQ)🤩

Answer (Explanation in comment)

MCQ 5- During the audit of Delta Ltd., the engagement team identifies a significant matter concerning the recoverability of a large receivable. The audit manager performs extensive procedures and concludes that the evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate. However, the manager’s working paper records only: “Recoverability checked. Evidence satisfactory. No further action required.” The engagement partner argues that this is sufficient because the actual audit procedures were performed and the underlying evidence is available elsewhere in the audit file. The partner further states that requiring the working paper to explain the auditor’s reasoning would amount to requiring the auditor to document every thought process involved in exercising professional judgment. Which of the following is MOST ACCURATE under SA 230? A. The documentation is sufficient because SA 230 requires documentation of procedures performed and evidence obtained, but does not require documentation of the auditor’s conclusions where the underlying evidence is available elsewhere in the file. B. The documentation is insufficient because the auditor shall prepare audit documentation sufficient to enable an experienced auditor, having no previous connection with the audit, to understand the nature, timing and extent of the procedures performed, the results and evidence obtained, and significant matters arising during the audit, including the significant professional judgments made in reaching conclusions on those matters. C. The documentation is insufficient only because all professional judgments made by the auditor, including preliminary thoughts and rejected alternatives, must be recorded in the audit documentation. D. The documentation is sufficient provided the engagement partner personally confirms that the procedures were actually performed, because SA 230 permits oral explanations by the engagement partner to supplement incomplete written documentation.

Are you allll ready for the Next and the Final MCQ of the day????🤩🤩🤩 react “❤️”

Answer ( Explanation in Comment)

Mcq 4 During the audit of Nova Ltd., the auditor identifies the following: Revenue is recognised on dispatch. Certain large year-end sales contracts contain unusually generous return rights. The CFO has a year-end bonus linked to reported revenue. The CFO personally instructed the finance team to post a large number of manual journal entries on 31 March. The entity’s internal controls over sales are otherwise operating effectively. The auditor believes that the risk relating to revenue recognition can be rebutted because the sales controls are effective and the contracts are approved by authorised personnel. Which of the following combinations represents the MOST APPROPRIATE application of SA 240? A. The auditor may rebut the presumed fraud risk in revenue recognition solely because the sales controls are operating effectively; the CFO’s incentive and manual journal entries are matters relevant only to the general control environment. B. The auditor should separately consider the presumed fraud risk relating to revenue recognition and the presumed risk of management override of controls; effective controls over sales do not, by themselves, eliminate either consideration. C. Since the CFO personally authorised the year-end journal entries, the entries are management-approved transactions and therefore cannot constitute management override of controls. D. Once the auditor identifies the revenue recognition risk, the presumed management-override risk becomes subsumed into the revenue risk and need not be separately evaluated.

Answer (Explanation in Comment)

Mcq 3 During the audit of Omega Ltd., the engagement team obtains the following evidence: Management has historically provided reliable information. The entity’s internal audit function has assessed management’s anti-fraud controls as effective. The audit committee has stated that it has “complete confidence” in the CFO. No employee has made a fraud allegation. External confirmations of major receivables agree with the books. The auditor nevertheless identifies a significant incentive for management to meet a debt covenant by year-end. The engagement partner concludes: “Since the cumulative evidence indicates that management is trustworthy and the controls are effective, continuing to challenge management’s representations would be inconsistent with an efficient risk-based audit. Professional skepticism requires the auditor to be alert to contradictory evidence, but it does not require the auditor to presume that management’s representations are unreliable in the absence of a specific fraud allegation.” Which of the following is MOST ACCURATE? A. The conclusion is substantially correct because professional skepticism does not require the auditor to assume that management is dishonest; once sufficient appropriate evidence corroborates management’s representations, further challenge is unnecessary unless a specific fraud indicator arises. B. The conclusion is incorrect because professional skepticism requires a questioning mind and critical assessment of audit evidence, and the existence of management incentives creates a circumstance requiring continued alertness even where management has historically been reliable; however, professional skepticism does not mean that the auditor must presume management’s dishonesty. C. The conclusion is incorrect because SA 240 requires the auditor to presume that all management representations contain fraud unless independently verified by external evidence. D. The conclusion is correct with respect to management’s representations but incorrect only because the debt covenant creates a presumed fraud risk in every financial statement assertion affected by borrowings.

Answer (Explanation in comment)

MCQ 2- PQR Ltd. appoints CA A as its statutory auditor. At the commencement of the engagement, management acknowledges responsibility for preparation of the financial statements and internal control. The applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable. Three months into the audit, management discovers that the audit team has identified a potentially significant fraud involving senior management. Management now proposes that: “Instead of continuing with the statutory audit, the engagement may be converted into a limited review engagement. The review will still provide useful assurance to the users and will avoid unnecessary disruption caused by a detailed fraud investigation.” Management further states that the fraud has not yet been established and therefore the auditor should not treat it as a reason to refuse the change. Assume that no law or regulation independently prohibits withdrawal from the original engagement. Which of the following is MOST APPROPRIATE? A. The auditor may agree to the change because SA 210 permits a change in the terms of engagement whenever management has a genuine business reason, and the existence of suspected fraud does not by itself invalidate such a reason. B. The auditor should refuse the change because SA 240 requires the auditor to investigate every suspected fraud to its final conclusion before the auditor can consider any change in engagement terms. C. The auditor should evaluate whether there is a reasonable justification for the change; where the requested change is not reasonably justified, the auditor should not agree to it, and management’s desire to reduce the scope in response to identified fraud risk would not, by itself, establish a reasonable justification. D. The auditor should agree to the change if management provides written confirmation that the users will be informed that the original audit was converted into a review because SA 210 primarily protects the users through disclosure.

Answer (Explanation in Comments)

MCQ 1: M/s Alpha & Co. is the statutory auditor of a listed entity, Zenith Ltd. The engagement partner, CA X, completed the audit and concluded that the auditor’s report was ready for issue on 25 June 2026. The Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR), CA Y, had not yet completed his review. On 27 June 2026, CA Y completed his EQCR and identified that the engagement team had failed to adequately evaluate a significant accounting estimate. CA X discussed the matter with the team, obtained additional audit evidence and revised the conclusion on the estimate. CA Y thereafter completed his review on 30 June 2026. The final auditor’s report was dated 30 June 2026. During August 2026, while assembling and archiving the final audit file, the engagement team discovered that certain documentation supporting the revised evaluation of the estimate had not been included in the file. The team subsequently added the documentation, recording the reasons for the addition. Which of the following is MOST ACCURATE? A. The auditor’s report could validly have been dated 25 June 2026 because the EQCR is a review of significant judgments and conclusions and does not form part of the audit evidence-gathering process; the subsequent completion of the EQCR merely strengthens the quality of the engagement. B. The auditor’s report could not be dated before completion of the EQCR; however, once the report was dated 30 June 2026, the documentation relating to the revised estimate could not be added in August 2026 because any post-report-date addition necessarily constitutes prohibited alteration of the audit file. C. The report should not be dated before completion of the EQCR, and the fact that the EQCR resulted in additional audit work demonstrates that the review is not merely an administrative exercise; the subsequent addition to the documentation may be made where appropriate, subject to documenting the circumstances and relevant details of the modification/addition. D. Since CA Y identified an inadequacy in the evaluation of the estimate, responsibility for the revised judgment shifted to CA Y; accordingly, CA X’s responsibility ended when CA Y completed the EQCR on 30 June 2026.

MCQs at 8pm, Get Ready 🙈 Aise khatarnaakkkkk MCQs banaaye h aap logo ke liye 🙈

Launching Handwritten Notes for CA Final Audit Nov'26 🔥 Announcement - https://youtu.be/BUaJ5enToFk?si=QepGugFr2Nv1DCfo 10% Special Discount Offer only for Today (Code - BOOKS5) ✌🏻 Last Stock for Nov’26 (No More Printings)! Today's Topics with Detailed Revision Videos Link - SQC 1 & SA 220 - https://youtu.be/0HMoz8lOHP0?si=ufyZKaoEFwmktTTP SA 200, 210 & 230 - https://youtu.be/NUiEih-7i0U?si=IZw5ayplgtVTCgKQ SA 240 - https://youtu.be/BzKenVHGygU?si=MC1soqCkUTDLWPz0 I CHALLENGE YOU TO GET ALL MCQs RIGHT 😎 React with a ❤️ if you accept this Challenge! Your Audit is My Responsibility 😉

Still underconfident in AFM? You can go for Exam Oriented Batch or Question Bank Batch!! It will be your best decision for AFM and I won’t let you down, that’s my promise ❤️ We are in This Together ❤️

15 Days Final Audit Planner 🔥 Announcement - https://youtu.be/awRDAK3Ucmw?si=G5lSHmwT59MkiL2H React with a “❤️” if you promise me to follow this planner! 😇 Daily MCQs starting from Tomorrow (QB Writing Practice Batch starting from 17th Aug) ✌️ Ps - LAST 2 Hours Left for Special Discount Offers on All Resources (No More Discounts for Nov'26 Attempt) We are in This Together ❤️