IELTS with Farrukh | IELTS 9.0

As the academic year is drawing to a close, here is the list of my current and upcoming groups. 🆎🔘🆎🔘🆎 🔢🔢 Pre-IELTS (last month; IELTS Introduction from October) 🔢🔢 🔤🔤🔤 Beginner (from September) 🔢🔢 IELTS Introduction (target exam date — November) 🆎🔘🆎-🔘🆎 🔢🔢 🔤🔤🔤 Pre-IELTS (from September) 🔢🔢 🔤🔤🔤 SAT EBRW (from September) 🔢🔢 IELTS Introduction (target exam date — October) 🔢🔢 Beginner (second month) To sign up, phone +998951446040 or +998951443040.

If you are so stupid that you'd rather fake the results than actually prepare for the test honestly, just don't take the test. The TRF can reveal the truth instantly. Every learning centre has the means to do this. And if you see people posting certificates with a blurred/hidden TRF, you know what you can accuse them of :)

Case #2

Parvina Speaking 7🔥🔥🔥✅✅ 💸Mukofot pulini berdim.

Parvina Speaking 7🔥🔥🔥✅✅ 💸Mukofot pulini berdim.

Case #1

Mahliyo Speaking 7🔥🔥🔥✅✅ 💵Mukofot pulini berdim.

Mahliyo Speaking 7🔥🔥🔥✅✅ 💵Mukofot pulini berdim.

TOPIC People still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. Why does it happen? Is art as important as advanced science and technology? ESSAY At a time when an ordinary person has access to the means of producing art pieces that can rival the work of the most prominent artists in terms of quality, detail, and overall appeal, it is only logical to expect that art will see a gradual but nonetheless inevitable decline in value. Yet, with powerful devices and revolutionary software at their disposal, people continue to appreciate artists as much as they did throughout history. The explanation for this unchanging attitude lies in the belief that true art can neither be replicated nor replaced by science and technology, however advanced – a belief that I support wholeheartedly. The first reason for the perceived superiority of human art over artificial art is the intrinsically human bias to prefer the familiar over the unknown. Over the course of human history, this specific trait encouraged individuals to unite with those exhibiting similar physical, cultural, or behavioural features, forming clusters that remained segregated from one another. The same trait explains consumer ethnocentrism, a concept characterised by the desire to support fellow local producers and the underlying belief in the superiority of local produce over imported goods. In both these cases, the “unknown” – be it an alien culture or a foreign brand – is instinctively perceived as dangerous, harmful to the established order of things and, therefore, undesired. The same concept can be applied to art: in this case, science and technology are the feared unknown, while human artistry is what audiences are naturally drawn towards. Another reason is that people often feel that authenticity correlates positively with the amount of effort and resources invested into an art project. Creating a traditional piece of art takes time, as the artist experiments with different media and techniques to ensure that their work conveys the intended message perfectly. Even more time – and money – is spent honing the skills and mastering the craft, which adds another layer of complexity to an artist’s work. Besides that, the vast experience and expertise that traditional artists gain over their careers lead them to develop a unique, unmistakable style that clearly sets them apart from the sheer multitude of other artists. Artificial art, on the other hand, lacks these important qualities: not only does it take significantly less time to produce, but it is also highly repetitive, with the same generic motifs found in most if not all artificial art pieces. This raises doubts regarding the legitimacy and quality of artificial art, which only further diverts audiences away from it and towards human art. Granted, a question does appear regarding the place of traditional art in the advanced world of today. With hitherto unimaginable wonders becoming commonplace all thanks to the great genius of the human mind, surely, this comparatively primitive part of human societies should play less of an important role than technology and science. However, I believe that this thinking is inherently flawed. Art – not science or technology – is the true manifestation of human intelligence, capabilities, and potential. It allows us humans to express ourselves in ways that science cannot comprehend and technology cannot replicate, and it elevates us far above the mundane problems we so often busy ourselves with. It is not without a reason that the height of a civilisation is not marked by scientific or technologic development, but by the state of its culture. The bottom line is that art can adapt to the changing nature of human societies, but it will never cease to play a crucial role in their development, far superior to that of science and technology. In conclusion, artists continue to be valued despite our technological and scientific progress because their skills and their experience allow them to produce extraordinary work, which even the most advanced software and devices will never match. Art has been an integral part of human societies for our entire history, and there is no reason for it to lose its value, however far we will progress in the future. 658 words

bruh, look at my thumbs

let's cringe together

An examiner is supposed to listen to HOW you talk, not WHAT you talk about. Seriously, why are these pseudo-professionals even tolerated? Tim is not the only one with this bullshit, he's just by far the most annoying one.

Yeah, Mr Tim, of course, it is our job to entertain you. It is our responsibility to ease the suffering of the specifics of the job YOU have chosen. It is our responsibility to invent some stuff and avoid talking about the general topics, because you find it boring. Such an arrogant, self-centered, full-of-himself piece of shit. And whatever official training you attend, they'll be quick to assure you that an examiner's assessment isn't influenced by other people, and that if somebody upsets them, it's not going to affect us. And here we are. Tim always proves these claims wrong. They are not his bosses, he says. He is free to do whatever he wants. I'm so glad this trash is no longer employed at IELTS. I hope I'll see less stuff about him.

Bugun Online Speaking Course imda Mr Tim 🚀 jonli dars o’tdilar. 450+ students jonli darsga qatnashdilar🔥🔥🔥 Darsga qatnashganlar, izohda fikrlaringizni ulashingizlarchi.

Bugun Online Speaking Course imda Mr Tim 🚀 jonli dars o’tdilar. 450+ students jonli darsga qatnashdilar🔥🔥🔥 Darsga qatnashganlar, izohda fikrlaringizni ulashingizlarchi.

My L/R breakdown be like:

👥 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🎓 BEGINNER 🗓 Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday 📊 18.30 – 20.30 🅰 Русский 💳 550 000 👤 Mr Farrukh Rustamov 👀 IELTS 9.0 📍 Alisher Navoiy 2 🗺 37, Alisher Navoiy street 📞 +998951446040 👀 +998951443040 ❗️ The first lesson will be held on July 9th (this Thursday).

Writing Checking Service The whole package includes: 1. A comprehensive analysis of mistakes across all criteria (both Task 1 and Task 2). 2. Identification of specific weak points and recurring patterns that may hinder your progress. 3. A personalised improvement plan, tailored to your specific capabilities and needs. 4. Whatever else that you haven't been able to get from AI (including guidelines on the correct incorporation of AI into your preparation, lol). You can look through the attached file. It shows a part of what you're going to get if you sign up for the writing checking service. The feedback will be able within 2 days. The price for the entire package is set at 250 000 UZS. If interested, hit me up at @farrustamov 🌈🌈🌈

Would anybody be interested in using my writing checking service? I'm talking about all-encompassing feedback and personalised suggestions/improvement plan, but obviously not what you can already get for free with AI. Not gonna be cheap, tho, but I'll still be asking a reasonable price for the amount of stuff you'll get. I think I have quite a few people who can vouch for the service's quality. Will post more details later.