News Renewed

Video forwarded from Konuko News (https://t.me/konuko_news/7007) Aerial view of La Guaira today, July 25, 2026. According to a message from Konuko News 11 hours ago, people in Venezuela are still working on the rescue of victims on the damaged areas. ▄︻デKonuko═━一 Resistance and Rebellion Collective. National Front of Revolutionary Collectives Sergio Rodríguez 💛💙❤️

🇮🇷🇱🇧| Iranians from Esfahan tonight, in the presence of Khoshcheshm, chant: “President of Iran, go to the aid of Lebanon.” Filmed by my dear friend. @FotrosResistancee

🇮🇷| ❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by Khanalizadeh According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected. After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it. After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all. He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis. Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file. This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions. After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader. The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions. Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure. The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit. After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU. The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks. SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member. Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented. One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …). Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU. Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.” The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework. The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC. @FotrosResistancee

— 🇮🇷 NEW: In an absolutely ridiculous move, IRIB (Seda va Sima) announces it will sue Iranian MP Mahmoud Nabavian for criticizing the negotiatiors on state TV, accusing him of making ‘distorted statements about classified documents and high-level correspondence’ Nabavian was talking on TV and mentioning that the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, gave his orders clearly to the negotiators (i.e. Qalibaf and Araqchi) but they ‘brushed it off’ and proceeded with signing the MoU anyway. The broadcast was suddenly cut during Nabavian’s remarks, citing technical issues. Now we know this was false. The Director General of IRIB responsible for the broadcast has also resigned and accepted responsibility for ‘allowing such an unethical guest’ on the live programme. @Middle_East_Spectator

Money, money, money! Iranian leadership smells awfully funny! It is becoming clearer and clearer that Iran has been betrayed by its political leadership and that Mojtaba Khamenei, supposedly its supreme leader, if not dead, is at best living in enforced isolation from others. The main traitors are the nation's president, the head of its military, its foreign minister, and the head of its parliament who has kept parliament from assembling for three months. It is clear that these individuals have no intention of helping Palestinians, either in Gaza or in the West Bank, any further. Nor do they intend to do anything more than offer lip service to Hezbollah resistance forces in Lebanon. Moreover, it is clear that the only ties they have with Yemen now are purely formal and not substantive. Mr. Ghalibaf, the speaker of the Iranian parliament, recently put things into an understandable perspective, by publicly stating that Iran needed to consider economic matters and be like China. The recent Memorandum of Understanding offers Iran the prospect of receiving more than 300 billion dollars. Obviously, no one involved in negotiating the Memorandum expects the actual sum of money to be transferred to Iran to be anything near that sum of money. We can speculate, though, that a more reasonable sum of money will have been made available to pay these before mentioned individuals off. We can even speculate that Japan may be the country assigned the responsibility of picking up the money-laundering bill. The reason for thinking so is because the Japanese government, only a few days before the Memorandum was agreed on, used its overwhelming majority in Japan's supreme legislative body, the National Diet, to pass a one-of-a-kind, close to 20 billion dollar "blackhole" budgetary item for use over the coming year by the Prime Minister, at her discretion with no need to provide receipts or other form of public reporting. This particular "blackhole" budgetary item has a long history in Japan. The scale, though, has always been modest, roughly 1000 times less than what it suddenly has become. When people in Japan showed alarm, the Communist Party of Japan was the only political party to aggressively push for budgetary transparency. In answer to the questions it made of the Prime Minister, the answer given was that it was for the health and welfare of the Japanese nation. Nothing more was said and debate was discontinued. But, Japan, like Germany, is still under the military occupation of the United States, Japanese politicians are used to obediently doing the will of their deep state American masters, and the timing of the passage of the Japanese "blackhole" budgetary item just before the conclusion of the Memorandum of Understanding between America and Iran is too convenient not to raise suspicion. So, simply on the basis of suspicion and a certain knowledge of the costs associated with political prostitution in Japan, until the results of the American mid-term elections five months from now are known, it does not seem improbable that the offshore tax haven bank accounts of the Iranian leadership will not be provided with less than perhaps one billion dollars per month from Japan and that the Trump family will get at least an equal amount. In the end, though, the Iranian people, themselves, are unlikely to get anything monetarily meaningful out of their nation being betrayed. As for Lebanon, it already seems clear that Lebanon will be abandoned. And, as for Gaza, Gaza is no long a part of the picture, is it? But, I still project the real loser to be the Hebrew-speaking West-Asian apartheid enclave. If what can be suspected is true, then availability of "blackhole" budgetary funds will simply have the effect of allowing the enclave to continue present policies with no change, thus further alienating both the enclave and the American president further and further from the present trajectory of world opinion until inevitably things crack apart. So, money, money, money! Once things crack, its a poor man's world. #newsrenewed #Iran #America #blackhole #money #prostitution

🇮🇷| Iranian Army Soldier affirms they are in control of the Strait of Hormoz, not the gentlemen in suits and ties in Tehran or Washington. He says: “Behind me is the Strait of Hormoz: The closest point to the mouth of the strait. This is our Persian Gulf. We are still here, in 55 degree humid heat, standing with our flesh, blood, and soul, far from our wives and children, and we will never abandon this place.” He bravely says: “We are the ones who decide who passes through here, not the suit-wearers in Tehran sitting under air conditioners, and not those in Washington. We are here, and we say who goes and who comes.” He says they will not let the blood of fallen comrades be wasted, urges people to stay in the streets, and promises that as long as the people don’t give up, they won’t abandon the Strait either. “We have stood here until the last drop of our blood. As long as every one of us, the boys of the IRGC and the Army, are here, no one has the right to pass through. We will not make ourselves indebted to the blood of the boys and girls of Minab, and we will not allow their blood to be trampled. People, stay in the field. Stay in the streets. We are here. If you do not abandon the streets, we will not abandon this place either. Rest assured. By God, we are not regretful. By God, none of us is upset that we have been standing here for 100 days now. I am saying this: with our flesh and soul, with our blood, and as long as there is blood in our veins, we will stand here. And we will firmly defend this Gulf and the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran, by the permission of Lady Fatimah Zahra, and by the permission of my leader, Imam Seyed Mojtaba Khamenei. The traitors to the homeland should know: we are here as long as there is life in our bodies.” @FotrosResistancee

Here is one book that gives a, imo, good description of Zionism with how it came into existence. Like with any source, some things can be seen differently and/or are not true.

I have tons of sources but this is it in a nutshell:

As far as I know, the Zionist ideology originated from a kind of Christian sect in England in the ~16th century. The Jews themselves were not initially enthusiastic about the idea and had to be convinced of it first. This was apparently similar to today's think tanks, where these "inventors" of Zionism worked on behalf of the British rulers to provide a justification for the fight against the Ottoman Empire. It seems to me that it was ultimately about the route to South Asia. There was no Suez Canal yet, and the route around South Africa was long and very dangerous. What I lack is precise knowledge about the history of England and Great Britain, in order to better contextualize my thoughts. Perhaps someone with a better knowledge of British history can help give a clearer explanation. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

ABRAHAM, Part Two: Neuroses Abraham, as described in Genesis, the first book of the Hebrew Tanakh and the Christian Old Testament is universally treated with reverence. In part One of this essay I used the Biblical dating of the major events of his life to produce a plausible timeline that would make sense in a modern context. I did not deal with the inner workings of his brain, of why, if he had been living in this century or the last, his relationship with his God would have had him committed to an insane asylum. But, first of all, let's consider Abraham's theology. He was not, strictly speaking, a monotheist. He believed that there were a multitude of gods, much in the same way that many people today believe that everyone has their very own guardian angel. Abraham's god was just one of these many gods. What made Abraham different from others was that his god would on many occasions speak to him. Moreover, Abraham's god had the personality of prickly pear. He was a jealous god and vindictive and would not hesitate to wreak havoc on the lives of those he disliked. On this account, Abraham was deeply afraid of him and felt obliged to obey him no matter what he might be required to do. Nevertheless, Abraham was not above trying to trick his god to his own personal benefit. He once asked his god what his name was, something which his god refused to answer, merely saying "I am what I am". The reason for this exchange was a common folk belief that names carried spiritual power and that, if a person knew the real name of another, whether human or divine, then, through the use of magic, he would be able to bring that being, whether divine or human, under his personal control. Abraham was setting a trap which Abraham's god skillfully avoided. Abraham was also not above bargaining with his god. When Abraham's god informed him of the soon to come destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham successfully bargained down the necessary threshold for the destruction of those two cities, allowing all the evil those two cities were famous for to continue unabated if only ten good men could be found. But, let's consider the negative aspects of Abraham's relationship with his god. He was commanded to leave his relations living in Haran and he did, taking with him Sarah, his half-sister and wife, and Lot, his dead brother's son. On another occasion, Abraham's god promised his descendants the lands from the River Nile to the River Euphrates, lands belonging to other peoples. thus providing a foundation for future theft and murder which continues even now. Then, the god of Abraham is said to have commanded that he circumcise himself and the male members of his household. In ancient times, circumcision was a practice of the Egyptians. Could it be that Abraham came to the conclusion that by giving up a bit of his skin and the skin of other males under his control, he could position himself for a more favorable commercial relationship with Egypt? In any case, using the command of his god as an excuse could have been used to shut down possible opposition effectively and quickly. Apparently, Abraham felt an economic impulse and Abraham's god reacted accordingly. Then, there was the case where Abraham's god commanded him to offer up to him Isaac as a sacrifice. In Abraham's mind, being ordered by one's god to commit human sacrifice was seen as something perfectly normal. Sad perhaps, but perfectly normal. Fortunately, Abraham's god stopped the human sacrifice at the last moment, providing an animal for Abraham to sacrifice instead. Then, there was the matter of Abraham's sons. Abraham sent his first son Ishmael, together with the boy's Egyptian mother Hagar, to die in the wilderness so as to make room for Isaac. Fortunately, Ishmael survived, but not through any help from Abraham. Then, there are the six sons of his old age by Keturah. They, too, are sent away, this time with presents. Considering, though, evidence from other stories in Genesis, these presents cannot have been either magnificent or abundant. And considering the time line presented in Part One of this essay and assuming that Keturah's sons were sent away shortly before his death, the oldest could not have been more than 21 and the youngest probably no older than around 10 years of age or thereabouts. In spite of their greater needs, they were not allowed by Abraham to share in Isaac's inheritance. They were dispensable and he reacted by dispensing with them. So, what are we to think of Abraham as a human being? He is an individual whom, for reasons already explained, I consider as a possible ancestor. Moreover, being a flawed individual with a Christian Zionist influenced childhood, I find myself uncomfortably able to understand Abraham's psychological make up. But, even among the several thousand ancestors a life devoted to genealogical research has so far been able to uncover, finding an ancestor I can unreservedly respect as a role model is a matter of great difficulty. The list is small and Abraham is not on it. #newsrenewed #Abraham #Zionism #Nile #Euphrates

ABRAHAM, Part One: Chronology I was raised as a Christian Zionist in the 1950s and 1960s and it was a horrifying experience. I was taught to believe that the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, the Old Testament Jewish prophets and the New Testament Book of Revelation was the God who was personified on earth as Jesus Christ. I still believe in Jesus of Nazareth, considering his teaching and his legacy to be of profound importance, the very foundation of the ethical system by which I try to often unsuccessfully use as a guide for living the life I would hope to live. However, it now seems clear to me that Jesus did not worship himself and that the God of Jesus was a divinity Jesus saw as being clearly distinct from himself. I would like to, therefore, imagine that I believe, not in Jesus as a God, but as someone who reimagined the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses as a God that could be more fitting for the human race to believe in than what had previously been the case. But, this short essay is neither about me, nor about Jesus. Rather, it is about Abraham, a man my remote Sephardic Jewish ancestry makes it likely that I descend from, and Abraham's God. Abraham was a man we would now diagnose as having psychiatric problems, if he were a man born in modern times. Most of these problems, some of which I personally identify with, will be dealt with elsewhere, Here we will mention only one, as it impacts Biblical chronology. It concerns his wife Sarah. According to Genesis, she was also his half-sister Sarah. It is also written that he and Sarah had two brothers, one of whom died before either Abraham or his other siblings. This particular brother had a son, Lot, and two daughters, one of whom Genesis claims was married to Abraham's other brother. Abraham's place of origin is said to be Ur of the Chaldees, which modern archeologists have identified without solid proof as being a city in Sumer in what is now southern Iraq. This, though, is, historically speaking, a recent designation. There are many others. The one that seems most probable to me is a location in an ancient kingdom located in northern Iraq called Urartu, a name which is linguistically connected with Mount Ararat of Noah and with the Armenian people. Nevertheless, I do not consider this as being a certainty. Then there is the question of Abraham's age. In my mind, human biology takes precedence over the written word of Genesis. However, there is a way of making the chronology of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob work. If we assume that, in their case, the word year meant a period of time beginning with an equinox and ending with an equinox, then a modern year would equal two equinox-based years. What it means is that Abraham might have been 50 when Isaac was born and Sarah 45. Since the two were half-siblings, we may assume that Isaac was not their only child, rather he was the only child who survived to adulthood the incestuous marriage they had entered into. There would have surely been a succession of miscarriages. Even in Biblical times 45, would not have been too old to have a child, but for someone with a history of being unable to carry a pregnancy full term, being told she would produce an infant capable of surviving to adulthood, most certainly would have resulted in laughter. Besides, why did she need to go through yet another certain failed pregnancy? She had already used Hagar, her handmaiden, as the womb by which she had a son named Ishmael whom she was able to adopt. Nevertheless, in spite of the near miraculous occurrence of Isaac's birth and survival, nothing obviates the incestuous nature of Isaac's parentage as being the likely explanation of Isaac's bad eyesight and eventual blindness. As for Biblical chronology, Sarah would have died at the age of 60. Abraham, being 65 and still healthy, took an apparently unrelated woman Keturah as his concubine and proceeded to have six sons by her. At around 70, he arranged for Isaac to marry his cousin Rebecca whose grandfather was Abraham's brother and whose grandmother was Abraham's niece, Lot's sister. Isaac and Rebecca, too, are said to have had trouble having children with only one successful pregnancy resulting in twin sons when Isaac would have been 30 and Abraham 80. Abraham would have died in his 87th year, when he was buried by Ishmael, his oldest son who would have been around 40, and by Isaac who would have been 37. Please note that the above is nothing more than a plausible reconstruction. Nothing can be proven chronologically. Moreover, I did not deal with with Abraham's questionable mental health, something I will begin dealing with in the next part of this essay. #newsrenewed #Abraham #Sarah #Lot #Keturah #God

WHY HAS GAZA BEEN ABANDONED? What was particularly interesting to me about the Ramadan War between Iran and the American-Hebrew speaking enclave-Arab Gulf State Zionist coalition was that Gaza was abandoned, It was no longer covered on Telegram channels and Iranian missile attacks on the enclave focused on military installations everywhere else in Palestine except for the occupied territories of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Also, negotiations never mentioned the occupied territories by name. The demand was that Lebanon should not be attacked. And never was any protest made with regard to the occupied territories. It seems as if even before the Ramadan War began, a decision had already been made in Iran to give the occupied territories to the Hebrew speaking West Asian enclave. But, why? And what was the Iranian government expecting in return? Was it an unbelievable amount of money? Does it have to do with the 300 billion dollars in investment in Iran that Mr. Trump seems to have agreed to? Could it be that certain individuals at the very top of the Iranian government have calculated that the cut they will get through ordinary channels of corruption will be enormous, if the money starts flowing. Instead of being merely billionaires, they will become worth tens of billions of dollars, perhaps, depending on the person, one hundred billion dollars or more. Of course, no one outside of a select few has knowledge of what is going on in the minds of those who till now have been in control of Iran's government. And that is Iran's only real weakness. In spite of the brilliance of its ordinary people, like America, the Hebrew speaking enclave, and the various Persian Gulf Arab monarchies, Iran lacks transparency at the highest levels and is as obviously corrupt as the Zionist controlled nations it is at war with. Gaza, the Iranian people still love you and want you to prosper, but it seems all too clear that the Iranian government has sold you to Mr. Trump. The only good thing about this is that Mr. Trump can never be trusted to keep a promise, so it is unlikely that the Iranian leadership will ever see the money the Memorandum of Understanding envisions coming its way. And this, in turn, means yet another war can be expected. It might help. It might not, But, at least, it will be sure to bring about unexpected changes to those presently in power, no matter what country they might be representing. And, considering the present situation, that, in itself, will not be an entirely bad thing. #newsrenewed #Iran #MOU

IRAN'S RULERS HAVE BECOME TRAITORS: WHY? If someone brags about having killed your father and your wife and if you have proof that this is true, what would your reaction be? Mine would be to seek that person's complete and utter destruction—not only for that person but for everyone associated with that person. That would be the reaction of a normal human being. The new supreme leader of Iran is in that position, but, instead, the Iranian authorities claim that he has authorized the signing of an agreement with Mr. Trump and, indirectly, Mr. Netanyahu (the murderers of his father and his wife) designed to bring about peace for Iran with America and Israel. But, there are many odd things that have happened with regard to this man and others over the last two years, things that clearly point to many of the top leadership of Iran, both civilian and military, having become traitors to their own country. Let's begin with the first signs that something was clearly wrong inside Iran's top leadership. When President Raisi, the president immediately preceding the one Iran now has, suddenly died as a result of a helicopter crash, there were too many anomalies for this to have been a simple accident. It had to have been an assassination. Yet, the official position of Iranian officials was that this tragic accident would be thoroughly investigated by the Iranian military to find out exactly what went wrong. The final report confirmed what had already been stated at the beginning. And, the various anomalies were ignored. It was portrayed as an accident, a tragic accident and, therefore, most certainly not connected with Mossad agents known to be active in Azerbaijan at the time that Mr. Raisi was to return by helicopter from a visit with the president of Azerbaijan. Iranians, it was said, could forget about Mr. Raisi and proceed wholeheartedly with their elections for a new president. About this time an informant from Pakistan informed me that actually Mojtaba Khamenei, the present leader of Iran, was responsible for arranging the assassination of President Raisi. Also, around this time, an article was published on Telegram by Rybar which claimed that Khamenei family, being the family of the supreme leader, was not only the richest family in Iran, but, at the same time, that no member of that family was required to pay taxes. But, it was also widely reported that not only the Khamenei family, but many others, including the present president, had long histories of money laundering and involvement, both directly and indirectly, in other forms of corruption. During the presidential campaign to replace the assassinated President Raisi, it was constantly being hinted at by sources both inside and outside of Iran that the leadership of Iran, which included the family of the recently Trump and Netanyahu assassinated Ayatollah, did not want another hardliner as president as that would disrupt long established channels of corruption that had long proven so convenient to everyone involved. And, in fact, in the end, it was suggested that they got exactly the man they wanted. But, in fact, is Mojtaba Khamenei still alive? He has not shown himself since the assassination of his father, his wife, and other close family members. All we have are statements issued in his name. Could it be that he is being kept in a perpetual coma or under house arrest. And, why hasn't he made burial arrangements for his father? Perhaps the Israelis were right when three months ago they were claiming that he had been killed. If he is alive and in charge as Iranians would like to believe, then how can agreeing to a memorandum of understanding with Mr. Trump not be considered the act of a traitor, if not to his nation, then at the very least to his father and his wife? Not only that, how can this MOU not be considered the act of traitors, traitors who are supposed to be carrying out his will, namely the President of Iran and its foreign minister? But, if Mojtaba Khamenei is, actually, either dead or in a permanent coma or under house arrest, what does negotiating a memorandum of understanding in his name mean? It means the president, the foreign minister and certain other high level individuals, the military men who claim to hold their finger on the trigger, are also traitors, not only to the living and the dead of Iran but also to the human race. It is time for Iranians to demand transparency and accountability, two things which have so far been lacking. The chances, though, that this will happen are slim. Mr. Trump has allies in strange places, in Moscow, Islamabad, and Beijing, all of whom have come out in favor of a peace agreement. With friends like these, who needs enemies? Maybe, just maybe, if we are willing to be generous, we can say that the motivation for becoming traitors are not the usual motivations connected with money, but those connected with survival. But, even so, the taste it leaves in one's mouth is equally as vile. #newsrenewed #Iran #MOU

Written by Hikaru Kitabayashi Recently, the Japanese government under Prime Minister Takaichi forced through with almost no discussion the approval of a 3,000,000,000,000 yen budget item (about 20,000,000,000 American dollars) that could be used anonymously at the prime minister's discretion and for which there would be no requirement to provide any receipts or transactional records. This budgetary item is not new. It has long existed under previous prime ministers. What is new are the sums now available for future "black hole" outlays. Until recently, not more than a million dollars a month was available to the prime minister to play with and to corrupt the political establishment in Japan and elsewhere. Now, rather suddenly, Prime Minister Takaichi will be given free access to more than 1,000 times that amount of money. Obviously, the "black hole" are not intended for the prime minister's private use. Nor will the funds be used for the "welfare and safety" of the Japanese people, even though this is what the prime minister stated during a question and answer session involving the issue in the National Diet of Japan (Japan's parliament). We have to extrapolate from her known background and make educated guesses. One certainty is that throughout here career she has been intimately involved with the Unification Church, otherwise known as the Moonies, and they have been crucially important in supporting her rise as a Japanese political figure. As she, like most other Japanese, does not have any religious affiliation that she is known to be attached to, this does not, on the surface, make sense. For things to line up, we need to remember that the Unification Church was (and still remains) a CIA/American-South Korean Military intelligence creation which has long been used for money laundering illicit profits in East Asia to the United States and elsewhere. Recently, though, it has come under South Korean government attack and its usefulness is no longer as great as it once was. Turning Point USA was seen as a possible substitute, but, no one could have expected the events that unfolded after the carefully planned assassination of Charlie Kirk immediately upon having given the appearance of returning to America with his wife Erika (possibly the real negotiation target) from a trip to South Korea and Japan. With things no longer going for Turning Point USA as one might have reasonably expected at the time of Charlie Kirk's assassination, other means would have had to have been found for money laundering activities to continue unabated. And, what could be more convenient than this hitherto unexploited corruption vehicle lying at the heart of the national budget of Japan, a black hole this year's newly approved budget was made to dramatically expand. Unless proven otherwise false, we can assume that at least 19 billion dollars, out of the roughly 20 billion available, will reach American-Israeli intelligence community hands by the end of this fiscal year. The remainder, being a larger amount of funds than previously available, will be used to further corrupt the Japanese political establishment. Of course, all of the above is just a supposition, but the opacity created by this budgetary loophole leaves us with no other choice, if we are to make any attempt at all in trying to understand what is going on. So, everyone beware! Japan is sleeping with demonic bedfellows and is not nearly as benign as it might seem on the surface. #newsrenewed

Live stream finished (3 minutes)

Live stream started

Live stream finished (4 minutes)

Live stream started

Live stream finished (18 minutes)

Live stream started