tgindex
NinjaCoding @ NinjaTrader

NinjaCoding @ NinjaTrader

Статистика

Official Channel from NinjaCoding.net

Последний пост
14 авг.
Последнее чтение
15 авг.
Постов за неделю
4
Всего постов
23
Тип
открытый
Язык
und
Категория
Экономика (по похожим)
В каталоге с
13 авг.
Подписчики
928
0 за 1 дн.
Сутки
0
0,00%
Неделя
 
Месяц
 
Просмотров на пост
344
23 постов
Вовлечённость
37,1%
к подписчикам
Постов в день
0,6
всего 23
Упоминаний
0
каналов
Охват размещения
оценка
1/24сутки в ленте
74
1/48двое суток
84
1/72трое суток
91

Оценка по просмотрам недавних постов: пост набирает почти всё за первые сутки.

Посты

  • So imagine running a WFO like this, then analysing the results, makeing a few optimization settings tweaks and a few strategy tweaks and then running it again and analysing two different runs against each other. In real life, for human brain its very difficult to make an objective decision what exactly became better and what became worse. Now we have AI to analyse this and talk back to you so and the EOD you get the best possible solution for you live trading.

  • WFO survival)

  • So currently, Claude, GPT, etc. make it possible to write strategies quite effectively. Quite fast, good enough to test and trade. We have definitely taken this step into a new reality. Yes it can go a bit south, but if you iterate over and over, describe whats going on and if you are clear enough with your prompts you will get there sooner or later without touching any code. First, everyone was thinking that this is a game changer, but the real game changer is actually something else. Imagine running even 10+ WFO optimizations trying to make your strategy better and trying to keep intact with whats going on after tweaking it... literally tons of time , and most probably by iteration 2,3,4 you are done with it and it makes you so sick you cant maintain a clear mind as in what did wrong and what did right. Now imagine if an agent was doing this for you? Imagine an agent who remembers and logs every single step you take and analyzes your pathway. This is where the real game changer is in my opinion.

  • видео или голосовое, без подписи

  • For our dev clients guys please dont get lost, all your releases, invoices, time and task sheets are now stored in workspaces! Everyhting has been preserved!

  • So guys we have moved into a new website. There might be still small issues here and there so feel free to let us know if anything. Overall, welcome to the new NinjaCoding environment.

  • We are doing some technical works on the website today, please be aware of temporary distractions.

  • Thank you all for participating, looks like we have some winners!

  • видео или голосовое, без подписи

  • 🤖 AI is coming to NinjaCoding strategies! I'm going to take one of my open source NinjaTrader 8 strategies and extend it with AI — and YOU decide which one goes first. All 14 strategies come with full source code + video code review, so you'll see exactly how the AI gets wired in. 🗳 Vote in the poll below 👇 🎥 Video with all strategies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4id3KmOPn9g

  • NC-Screener (getting some super powers)

  • btw for discussions and ideas guys, welcome to our discord here https://discord.gg/RH4YaTnzA

  • Hi guys, I’ve been playing around with Brent lately and wanted to share some thoughts. Since I’m based in the Middle East, I was naturally leaning bullish on oil. At one point, there was real panic here — conflict risk, conspiracy theories, Economist-style headlines about oil and fertilizer shortages, the whole package. So yes, I went into long mode… sadly not from the levels I wish I had entered at. As usual, we learn the hard way. But while sitting in the depressed “what the hell did I do” phase, I started digging deeper into the fundamentals. And what became clear to me is that oil is a very interesting mix of real physical supply/demand and pure speculative positioning. The recent move down looked to me more like the speculative side of the market taking control. Traders used the MOU / de-escalation narrative to push Brent back toward the zone it originally launched from around February. So naturally I started asking myself: are we going lower from here? Do we just sit there and cook? Do we get some new global slowdown, lockdown, Ebola-style panic, demand destruction, oversupply narrative, and oil-to-zero type scenario again? Then I looked into the EIA data, especially Cushing. Cushing stocks are sitting around the 19–20 million barrel area, which is extremely tight. From what I understand, once you get toward the 18 million barrel zone, the facility starts getting close to its practical operational minimum — because you still need working inventory, tank bottoms, line fill, and enough crude moving through the system for everything to function properly. And then zoom out. The world consumes roughly 100 million barrels of oil per day. The U.S. has roughly 700–800 million barrels of crude when you include commercial stocks and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, but the actual SPR itself is much lower than that. So when you do the math, these numbers are not as comfortable as they look at first glance. That’s why I think the downside story may be more fragile than it appears. Yes, traders can push the market down for a while. Yes, headlines and positioning matter. But at some point, if physical inventories keep tightening — especially at key hubs like Cushing — the market has to respect the physical side again. So for me, this is no longer only about Middle East conflict risk. The bigger point is that if the speculative selling pushes oil too far down while the physical market is already tight, the rebound could be violent. Not financial advice, obviously. Just sharing my thought process as I try to survive another lesson from the Brent classroom.

  • And the winner is)

  • NC-Screener (coming soon)

  • Long story short. Future products should be distributed with source code so users can easily extend them with AI already having a strong codebase in place. Before no one wanted source code because no one wanted to code. Now, source code products should become more and more demanded since it does not require to have coding knowledge any more to extend them!

  • Hello guys! As you might have noticed it has become much easier to code lately with all these new and amazing AI tools available. The complexity to which we can step up to and save time is now to be honest quite shocking). This does not only change what we code and how we code and how we manage the whole process, this also changes what NinjaCoding can offer. So time has always been the most valuable product of all. NinjaCoding always approached its users with frameworks, source code, extendibility and education. Now, when AI stepped in, we also need to adjust to fit and to stand in line with value. AI can code, educate, answer as many questions as you want, and provide you with the most extensive support at any time instantly. An indicator now, can be coded in minutes and does not bring that much value. However a more complex product, a strategy or a trading or an analysis tool is something that will still require some effort. Difference is, that with this amount of effort now the complexity that can be provided to the user at base level is 100x what it used to be. What I am trying to get at is I think that next level of products is base level source code + AI extendability. Imagine you get the above screener source code and an instruction how to direct AI to add more of your own screener presets to it. Imagine you get a strategy framework source code with AI manual on how to extend its filters, entry types, and exit options in minutes yourself. That might be the next level of software era that we are heading into today. See you around! YZ (not an AI generated post)

  • видео или голосовое, без подписи

  • видео или голосовое, без подписи

  • All up and running now!

NinjaCoding @ NinjaTrader — tgindex