Keep Learning English
описание
🎯 Master your English with us 📖 Grammar • Vocabulary • Practice 🌟 Keep learning English, anywhere, anytime
2 598
подписчиков
Охват к подписчикам
26,2%
ERR
Реакции к просмотрам
0,00%
0 на 28 постов
Пересылки к просмотрам
0,21%
55
Постов в день
0,3
всего 30
Где отзываются чаще
доля реакций к просмотрам- 16 авг.🖐Compréhension écrite — Exercice 1 -2-3 📄Farkhod’s Post | DELF B2 🟢Sujet authentique — Conditions réelles d’examen 📌Lisez attentivement le document et répondez aux questions. 🖨️Version PDF disponible ✅Les réponses sont disponibles dans le PDF. ⭐Révisé par @Delf_Dalf_TCF_french_lesson 🎯Faites le test et partagez votre score dans les commentaires ! ❤️Laissez une réaction si vous souhaitez voir d’autres exercices authentiques du DELF B2.0,00%
- 16 авг.✨Aujourd’hui, un test exceptionnel vous attend ! Nous vous avons préparé un test en ligne dans un format pratique, moderne et agréable à utiliser. 💻 🏹Testez vos connaissances 📝Répondez directement en ligne ⚡Un format simple et confortable 📊Découvrez vos résultats à la fin 🔥Êtes-vous prêt(e) à relever le défi ? ⏳Le test sera publié aujourd’hui sur notre chaîne : 👉 @toujours_francais 🔔Restez connecté(e) et ne le manquez pas ! 🇫🇷FARKHOD’S POSTS — Apprendre le français autrement.0,00%
- 24 июл.🍿 Une femme mystérieuse détruit le destin des hommes | Thriller | Film Complet en Français 😱Elle arrive comme une source d’inspiration… et transforme la vie en cauchemar. On you tube #5 🎧Comment utiliser cette vidéo ? 🇫🇷 ✨1️⃣Regardez d’abord avec les sous-titres pour bien comprendre le dialogue. 📖 2️⃣Regardez sans le son et répétez chaque phrase à voix haute pour améliorer votre prononciation. 🔥 💙Répétez ces 2 étapes régulièrement et vous serez surpris par vos progrès ! ✅ @shadowing_francais0,00%
- 26 июн.🍿 FIFA World Cup frenzy and national pride in Uzbekistan - BBC World Service 🔴@keep_learning_english0,00%
- 22 июн.🇫🇷 Votre expression orale en français n'est pas encore au niveau que vous souhaitez ? Vous cherchez un groupe pour pratiquer et échanger en français ? ✨ Ce groupe est fait pour vous ! 👥 Rejoignez notre groupe de discussion en français : [https://t.me/delfdalfmilliysertifikat] 💬Pratiquez le français au quotidien ; 🤝Discutez avec d'autres apprenants ; 🚀Progressez ensemble vers vos objectifs0,00%
- 2 маяhttps://t.me/+qGG3K__LJ9g1YzY60,00%
- 25 мар.Communication clicks when teams learn each other’s native language Few things cause more friction across generations than how messages are sent, received, and judged. Every age group shares the same need: people want enough information to do their job well and to feel included and respected. But each generation has its own communication style that feels natural. Those preferences are shaped by the tools people grew up with, often long before they entered the workforce. Older generations built trust through letters, memos, meetings, and phone calls. Information came from experts, and conversation rewarded patience and focus. Many still value eye contact and uninterrupted discussion. The next wave – Gen X – grew up with television, where stories mattered more than credentials and messages came in short bursts. When it arrived in everyday life, email became their workhorse, with phone or video reserved for sensitive conversations. Then came millennials and Gen Z – two generations raised on the internet, feeds, and constant interaction. They expect conversation, not broadcast. They want to comment, respond, and be part of the exchange. Social tools feel normal, but only when there’s real engagement. Posting without interaction feels pointless. The youngest of these employees grew up mobile first. Images, speed, and clean design feel essential. They text constantly yet often prefer email at work because it feels clear and documented. They know their comfort zones and also recognize where they need practice, especially with in person conversations. Flexibility matters here, but it has limits. The test stays the same. If communication choices affect customers, safety, or revenue, they’re business decisions. Customer preferences always win. If clients expect a call, you call. If they expect a quick message or a video chat, you adapt. The same logic applies to recruiting and retention. Convenience can be the difference between engagement and opt out. Good teams flex both ways. Older colleagues experiment with new tools while younger ones slow down, listen, and learn the unwritten history that never shows up in a message thread. Those stories carry context, warnings, and hard-earned insight. The takeaway here is that every communication style has built-in strengths and blind spots. New tools boost speed and access, but they also distract. Experienced voices often spot risks early, especially around focus and overload. The goal isn’t to pick a winner but to learn each other’s language and choose the right one for the conversation you’re in at that particular moment. 🔴 @keep_learning_english0,00%
- 25 мар.What’s in it for me? Learn how to ease generational friction at work You've probably been in this meeting. Someone's checking their phone. Someone else looks annoyed. One person wants to talk it through. Another just wants the follow-up email. Everyone leaves irritated. This kind of friction shows up everywhere at work: it’s present in debates about remote work, feedback styles, meeting length, dress codes, loyalty, and technology. It can feel personal, even when it’s not. But this isn't a case of the devil being in the details. The real driver is something much bigger—and much newer. For the first time, workplaces include people who grew up before television, people shaped by email, people raised on social media, and people who have never known life without a smartphone. They all want to do good work. They all want respect, clarity, and purpose. They just go about it in different ways. That gap creates daily frustrations that add up. Younger employees feel dismissed or slowed down while their older counterparts feel ignored or pushed aside. Managers are stuck in the middle, trying to keep everyone productive without picking sides. The first bit of good news? These problems are predictable. They show up in the same places, time and again. Once you start spotting them, they become easier to manage. That's the second bit of good news. This Blink digs into generational tension and shows how small shifts in flexibility, understanding, and leadership can ease the friction and get people working together. Most importantly, it offers a way out of the generational blame game and a template for organizations that want to accommodate and nurture everyone who works there. Waiting your turn makes little sense when five generations share workplace For most of human history, families and workplaces (which were often one and the same thing) ran on a simple rule: you waited your turn. Authority and assets moved slowly from old to young, usually when someone stepped aside or died. That rhythm made sense in a world of farms, land, and livestock, where change crawled and roles stayed stable for decades. That world, though, is gone. We now live in societies and work in organizations in which up to five generations rub shoulders. That’s new. So is the friction that comes with it. Longer lives are the first pressure point. A century ago, careers ended around fifty. Today, people often hit their stride at that age. Leadership seats stay occupied longer, which means younger colleagues are often asked to wait until midlife before gaining real influence. Ambition, in short, now frequently collides with longevity. Many younger people worry that good things don't necessarily come to those who wait. The second pressure point is speed. Information moves at a pace that compresses generations and new tools and ideas reshape work every few years. It’s not unusual for someone in their twenties to master systems that didn’t exist when their manager was trained. A junior analyst can pull data on a phone that used to be restricted to executive briefings. Access invites challenge from every direction. The diffusion of knowledge undermines old hierarchies where age and authority once coincided. The third shift is cultural. The youngest four generations were raised as consumers: they were taught to question, compare, and expect choice. Many grew up with parents who prized independent thinking over obedience. That mindset walks straight into the workplace. People want a voice early, feedback often, and work that feels engaging rather than dutiful. Faced with this reality, organizations tend to stumble into two unhelpful responses. The first is trying to ignore differences. The second is trying to force one generation to behave like another – a surefire way of wasting energy and fuelling resentment. People rarely enjoy being improved against their will. What actually works is leadership, not correction. 🔴 @keep_learning_english0,00%
- 11 мар.#article 🔴@keep_learning_english0,00%
- 10 мар.Essentially, children of all ages need less, and better, experience with screens – and more, and better, experience in the real world. So from the ages of zero to five, parents can limit screen time and maximize opportunities for free, unstructured play. While parent-child play is a wonderful connecting experience and provides educational development, children also need to engage in play with other children, ideally of a wide range of ages, to develop essential social and problem-solving skills. As children enter elementary school, parents can encourage independence, such as walking to school or the local shops on their own. After-school time should be left mostly free for unstructured play, with limited structured activities. Families in the area can collaborate to create safe spaces for children to engage in free play while adhering to strict limits on screen time – for instance, no more than two hours per day – and utilizing rigorous parental controls and content filters on all devices in the home. For preteens and teens, the focus should be on developing competence and self-efficacy through mastering modes of transportation, such as cycling or public transit; taking on more responsibilities at home, like cooking meals; and engaging with the real world through part-time jobs, camping trips with friends, and other independent experiences. Around the age of 16, parents can consider transitioning their child to a smartphone and active social media accounts – but they should maintain family rules about screen use and monitor for signs of addiction and mental or emotional distress. At a minimum, the independence and competence that children are encouraged to develop in the real world should match – if not surpass – the autonomy they’re given in the virtual world. By striking this balance, parents and caregivers can mitigate the harmful impacts of excessive smartphone use and help their kids become healthier, happier individuals. Final summary The widespread adoption of smartphones has been the primary driver behind the dramatic surge in mental health challenges facing Gen Z. This is due to the ways in which smartphones have eroded the traditional play-based childhood and deprived young people of the essential experiences that foster healthy development. By limiting screen time, maximizing opportunities for unstructured play, and encouraging independence in the real world, parents and caregivers can help nurture the healthy development of young people in the digital age.0,00%
- 10 мар.Third, there’s attention fragmentation. The average teen receives eleven notifications per waking hour on their smartphone, with heavy users potentially experiencing one notification per minute of every waking hour. Smartphones and social media are designed to pull the user’s attention away from whatever they are doing, providing a constant stream of notifications and the accompanying dopamine hits. This fragmentation of attention can compromise an individual’s ability to focus deeply on a task or engage in slower, more reflective modes of thinking. Even the mere presence of a phone in the room has been shown to impede a teen’s ability to focus on a task! This continual access to smartphones during a crucial period of brain development can mean that some users’ capacity for focus and attention never fully matures, as evidenced by the upward trend in ADHD diagnoses. Not surprisingly, studies show that individuals with ADHD often spend above-average amounts of time online and on their smartphones. Finally, let’s discuss addiction. Smartphones and the apps that live on them are deliberately designed to be habit-forming and addictive. Preteens and teens, with their more plastic brains, are particularly vulnerable to developing these addictions. Smartphones and social media employ advanced behavioral techniques to create compulsive habits in users – the activation of external triggers, like notifications, is paired with the promise of variable rewards, such as likes or comments. This variability actually makes the experience more addictive, as users find themselves unable to resist the urge to seek out these rewards, even in the absence of the initial trigger. The dopamine rush that users experience when indulging their addiction is countered by the symptoms of withdrawal, including dysphoria, irritability, insomnia, and anxiety, that occur when the addiction can’t be satisfied. Taken together, these four core harms inflicted by smartphones – social deprivation, sleep deprivation, attention fragmentation, and addiction – have set the stage for the surge in mental disorders we’re seeing among children and adolescents. The negative impacts of smartphones and social media can be curbed Many adults who care for children and teens in some capacity are already well aware of the deleterious impact that smartphone use is having on this group’s mental and social well-being. The question then becomes, What can be done to address this pressing issue and support the healthy development of young people in the digital age? To achieve a lasting, positive transformation, structural changes need to occur at the societal level. In the United States, governments have taken a paradoxical approach to protecting children – zealously enforcing vague “child neglect” laws to overprotect them in the physical world while underprotecting them in the virtual realm. Governments should take proactive steps to address this imbalance, such as passing laws that compel online companies, including social media and gaming platforms, to treat underage users with an extra duty of care. The age of “internet adulthood” should be raised to 16, recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of adolescents. At the same time, governments should institute more opportunities for free play and recess in the school system, and narrow neglect laws so parents can legally allow their children to engage in unsupervised play. Tech companies, which have demonstrated remarkable ingenuity in creating habit-forming products, should now turn that same level of innovation toward ensuring the safety and well-being of children online. This could involve developing better age verification methods and far stricter options for parental control over digital content and device usage. While structural change is necessary, it may be slow in coming. In the meantime, there are steps that parents and caregivers can take to protect children and promote healthy development.0,00%
- 10 мар.In recent decades, parents have focused on protecting children from perceived physical risks such as cars or sex offenders. But what about protecting them from smartphones and social media? Setting up guardrails for children in the physical world can be counterproductive, leading to a decrease in resilience, independence, and unsupervised play time. Risky play is necessary for children to learn problem-solving and build confidence and self-efficacy. Dealing with boredom and frustration regularly is also key for becoming an emotionally healthy adult. In light of this, placing a child in a bubble of satisfaction and safety isn’t good for their development. At the same time, we’ve failed to adequately protect children from the risks posed by the constant access to social media, photo filters, and addictive games. The introduction of the smartphone has fundamentally altered the nature of childhood, depriving children of the critical experiences of free play, attunement, and organic social learning. And this shift has had negative consequences for the mental health of Generation Z, as evidenced by the alarming surge in reported cases of depression, anxiety, and self-harm. Addressing this crisis requires a deeper understanding of the connection between technology, social dynamics, and child development – which is what we’ll look at next. From sleep deprivation to attention fragmentation, smartphone use dangerously impacts children’s health There’s no doubt that the rapid shift from flip phones to smartphones at the end of the 2000s and the start of the 2010s has dramatically transformed the nature of childhood. In this section, we’ll outline the four major ways in which smartphones have adversely impacted the mental well-being of young people. First up? Social deprivation. As we know, in-person, play-based social interactions are fundamental to a child’s healthy social development. But from 2009 onward, the time children spend interacting with friends face-to-face has dropped markedly. Even when children and teens do spend time together, they increasingly do so with their phones in hand, diminishing the quality of their interactions. This trend extends to family life as well, as parents too have become distracted by their smartphones. In a study of children aged 6–12, 62 percent reported that their parents were “distracted” when they tried to talk with them, with the primary reason being smartphone use. The second adverse effect of smartphones is sleep deprivation. Biological rhythms shift during adolescence; for generations, parents have struggled to wake their teen or preteen in time for school. Smartphones have exacerbated this issue, as late-night phone use is known to be disruptive to sleep. A review of 36 studies concludes that there’s a clear correlational relationship between smartphone use and sleep deprivation among adolescents. This sleep deprivation is associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, aggression, and impeded impulse control. 🔴@keep_learning_english0,00%