ARYAH - Mountain of God

Thank you all for 500 subscribers. To commemorate this, I have opened a discussion chat for this channel: ——— https://t.me/+AjZ4gqNklZQwOTA0 ——— I will define its purpose, rules, intended audience, and other such matters in due course. For now, share this post, then join the chat. @MountainOfGod

thanks for 80 subs

thanks for 80 subs

They were White.

In memory of Bruce pierce

Extension The image above demonstrates the reality of this, showing how, when one strips away all aesthetic framing (theological-specific language, historical meta-narratives, etc.), the underlying structure, methods, aims, goals, and eschatology of the various…

CLARIFICATION POST (1) (2) What I AM Saying: 1. Structural Analysis =/= Moral Endorsement My chart comparing various NS religions was descriptive analysis. It was not prescriptive alliance-building. When a biologist identifies structural similarities between…

Extension The image above demonstrates the reality of this, showing how, when one strips away all aesthetic framing (theological-specific language, historical meta-narratives, etc.), the underlying structure, methods, aims, goals, and eschatology of the various…

—Matthew 21:28-30— "...A man had two sons, and having come forth to the first he said: ‘Son, go, today you must work in the vineyard.’ But he responding said ‘I do not want to’, however changing his line of conduct he went. Then coming forth to the other he…

—Matthew 21:28-30— "...A man had two sons, and having come forth to the first he said: ‘Son, go, today you must work in the vineyard.’ But he responding said ‘I do not want to’, however changing his line of conduct he went. Then coming forth to the other he spoke likewise. And responding he said “I shall, master’, yet he did not go. Who out of the two sons has done the will of the father?” They say “the first!" Jesus said to them, “Assuredly, I say to you that tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you... This passage serves as a typology of the conflict between secular-NS and Judeo-"Christians", specifically regarding the "will of the Father" as it pertains to racial preservation and the Law. "doing the will of the Father" is practical obedience to the Law, alone. Verbal profession is irrelevant. The highest Christian duties are to maintain the "kind after kind" creation of Yahweh (Leviticus 19:19), separate from those who are not "born from above" (2 Corinthians 6:17), and to "love your kinsman as yourself", which is the entire Law summarised (Galatians 5:14). The second son who says, "I shall", but does not go, is a type for the Judeo-"Christian". They claim to be "for God" and honour Him with their lips, but their "hearts are far from Him" because they consistently break His foundational commandments regarding racial separation. The first son who says, "I do not want to", but goes anyway, functions as a type for the secular-NS. They may claim to be "against God" because they perceive the corrupted, universalist church to be the true form of the religion, but by being "racists", they are doing the Father's will, whether they know it or not. However, many of these people have been exposed to the CI truth, yet reject it, and thus, though they do the will of the Father, they still "supress the truth in unrighteousness" for "that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them" and "they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God" and "Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the likeness of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures" (Romans 1). While the first son acts correctly, he needs to stop suppressing what he knows to be true in his unrighteous pride, repent, and realise the divine origin of his "genetic urging" (the Law of God, to love the brethren, written upon his heart (Jeremiah 31:33)). —Matthew 7:21— Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. @MountainOfGod

Wherever the aryan man goes, that land has been promised to him by God

Zionism is an ethnonationalist movement seeking to establish a Jewish ethnostate by colonizing Palestine. Now, as you’ve read the title, you may ask yourself “how the hell are these two words compatible?” Well they aren’t, Atleast using the definition we have mentioned. But if we look at it from a simple perspective, it’s just outright Jewish colonialism. We simply oppose Zionism because it ultimately benefits the kikes, “white Zionism” is the same principle, but applied to whites, it’s the Jewish colonialist mentality which we want to have. But we don’t abide by the bourgeoisie imperialism, the imperialism that only harvests the riches of the soil and gives it to the top 1%. Wherever the aryan man goes, that land has been promised to him by God and by the best men his race has produced. SIEGEKULTUR⚡️ SIMPLE X CHANNEL⚖️ THE BACKUP⚡️

Physical Descriptions of Israel 3rd Century Jesus Recently, a 3rd-century Christian fresco was discovered in an ancient burial chamber near Iznik, Turkey, the site of the old city of Nicaea. It shows Jesus as the “Good Shepherd,” surrounded by sheep, which was one of the earliest and most common symbolic depictions of Christ before the later Byzantine icon style developed. Archaeologists have described it as one of the best-preserved early images of Jesus ever found because much of the original colour and detail survived underground for centuries. The discovery gives us a rare look into how early Christians visually represented Jesus before Christianity became the dominant religion of the Roman Empire. It depicts him with clear Caucasoid features. It’s also worth noting that the pigment has likely faded over time and would’ve been lighter at the time it was created. Blut über alles. @Biospirituality ✝️

— Revelation 21:12 “And [the City of God] had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel” @MountainOfGod White Europeans are the…

— Revelation 21:12 “And [the City of God] had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel” @MountainOfGod White Europeans are the Israelites. The "jews" are not.

"As many as feared God...ran to Christ...For He said: 'Go ye to the sheep of the house of Israel, which have perished.' The Word of God...did righteously...redeem from [apostasy] His own property...not snatching away by stratagem the property of another, but taking possession of His own. This hand of God...has in the last times sought us out...winning back His own, and taking up the lost sheep upon His shoulders. He gathered from the ends of the earth...the children who were scattered abroad. Saith the Lord, I will gather Israel from all nations...Nations of those barbarians...[have] salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit. As the good olive, if neglected...does itself become a wild olive...The Church IS the seed of Abraham...who will gather...those that shall be saved from all the nations. The Lord...has redeemed us...For the children of the desolate are more than of her which hath an husband." — Irenaeus, Various Works. Christian Identity in the Church Fathers

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers Continuing my studies of some of the so-called ante-Nicene "Church Fathers", another who I have found to be highly palatable to Christian Identity, alongside Tertullian, is Irenaeus. Irenaeus was born to Christian parents around 130 AD, and later became the bishop of Lugdunum (Lyons) among the Keltæ of Gaul. He strongly emphasised the preservation of the Adamic archetype, the regathering of scattered Israel, and the destruction of the serpent's seed. Irenaeus can be read as supporting: — White Adamitism — Dual Seedline — The Israelite Identity of the so-called "Gentiles" — The Edomite/Canaanite Identity of the "Jews" The hermeneutics for each of these points are summarised very briefly below: — White Adamitism Irenaeus repeatedly defines the visible apostolic Church within the White and (now) formerly White nations of the Graeco-Roman oikoumene: Germany, Spain, Gaul, Rome, the East, Egypt, Libya, the Central regions, and the Keltæ. These are the peoples among whom the "one and the same vivifying faith" and "unadulterated rule of truth" are preserved. Christ came to "sum up in Himself the ancient formation of Adam" and restore the "pristine nature of man." Those outside this restored order are repeatedly described as "animal", "irrational", "mere dumb animals", "waste water from a sink", and "nothing", while the Deluge itself was sent to preserve the Adamic archetype from corruption by the offspring of fallen angels. — Dual Seedline Irenaeus explicitly teaches that the apostate angel sowed "tares" among the wheat, and identifies those tares as "the children of the wicked one." Cain was "filled" with the spirit of the apostate angel, and "everyone of that race [of Cain]... was made like to the begetter [the apostate angel]." He repeatedly describes the wicked as "offspring of vipers", "sons and angels of the devil", "alienated from the womb", possessing "the likeness of a serpent." The antediluvian unions between angels and women produced an "infamous race of men" whom God destroyed to preserve the Adamic archetype, but who lived on through the seed of Ham. — The Israelite Identity of the so-called "Gentiles" Irenaeus presents Christ as coming specifically for the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" and for the purpose of "winning back His own." The believing nations of Europe — Germany, Gaul, Spain, and the Keltæ — are described as barbarians possessing the law written inwardly on their heart by the Spirit. Through the metaphor of the wild olive tree, Irenaeus argues that the "wild" branches are actually the original olive gone wild through neglect and paganism, later restored to their "pristine nature." Thus the Gentiles are interpreted as scattered Israelites regathered from the nations and restored to the inheritance of Jacob. — The Edomite/Canaanite Identity of the "Jews" Irenaeus links the corruption of Judaea to the Idumean Herod, who, to hide his lack of Israelite ancestry, "burned the registers" to conceal his ignoble Edomite ancestry. He interprets Jacob and Esau as two opposed nations existing together in Judaea, with the "elder nation" (Esau) rejecting Christ while the "younger nation" (Jacob) receives Him. The corrupt Jewish rulers are explicitly called "seed of Canaan, and not of Judah." The unbelieving Jews are further identified with Cain, the serpent seed, the "offspring of vipers", "rulers of Sodom", and "children of the wicked one." While not every detail of his theology aligns perfectly with modern Christian Identity (as we would expect after 1900+ years), Irenaeus presents a worldview remarkably congruent with core Christian Identity distinctives, and is a clear patristic witness to its truth. Christian Identity is Apostolic, Patristic Christianity.

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The "Jews" who rejected Christ as the Edomites and Seed of Canaan, according to Irenaeus Irenaeus presents the Judaea of Christ's day as a divided and corrupted nation in which the true Judahite-Israelite remnant existed alongside an alien usurping population descended from Edom and Canaan. He traces the corruption of Judaea particularly through Herod the Great, whom he identifies as the son of "Antipater, an Idumean robber." According to Irenaeus: "Herod, knowing that the lineage of the Israelites contributed nothing to him...Burned the registers of their families...thinking that he would appear to be of noble birth if no one else could trace back his descent..." Thus the biological distinction between true Israelites and alien interlopers was obscured under the Idumean dynasty. Irenaeus interprets the prophecy concerning Jacob and Esau as referring to two opposed peoples existing together within Judaea itself: "Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people are in thy body... Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." The "elder nation" (Esau) rejected Christ while the "younger nation" (Jacob) received Him. He explicitly states: "The younger nation received Him, Christ, the first-begotten, when the elder nation rejected Him." This younger nation becomes the Church, which is the restoration and regathering of the lost sheep of the house of Israel under Christ, while the elder corresponds to Esau/Edom and the unbelieving synagogue of Satan. The corrupt rulers and presbyters of the Jews are explicitly rebuked by Irenaeus using Daniel's condemnation: "O thou seed of Canaan, and not of Judah." This identification of the Jewish leadership as the "seed of Canaan", the nation Esau married into, is linked to the cursed posterity of Ham, whom Irenaeus elsewhere describes as remaining under a perpetual curse. Those who rejected Christ are also identified with Cain and the serpent seed. Irenaeus argues that the apostate angel "filled Cain with his spirit" and that Cain's descendants became "like to the begetter." The unbelieving Jews are called a "offsprings of vipers," "sons and angels of the devil," "rulers of Sodom," and "children of the wicked one." He further states that they are "alienated from the womb" and possess "the likeness of a serpent." Their rejection of Christ reveals their true lineage and nature. They are contrasted with the believing remnant — the "Israelite indeed in whom was no guile" — and with the Desposyni, the kinsmen of the Saviour according to the flesh, who preserved the true genealogies after Herod destroyed the public records. The true inheritance therefore passes not to the synagogue which rejected the King, but to the Church, the true "seed of Abraham" and restored House of Jacob. The unbelieving Jews become the "children of the kingdom" cast into outer darkness, while the faithful remnant inherit the promises. Thus, Irenaeus presents the conflict between Christ and the Jews not as a theological dispute, but as the manifestation of the ancient struggle between Jacob and Esau, the righteous seed and the seed of Canaan, the children of God and the children of the devil.

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The "Gentiles" as the scattered, cast-off, formerly pagan but now reconciled Israelites according to Irenaeus Irenaeus repeatedly interprets the calling of the "Gentiles" as the regathering of the scattered children of Israel and the restoration of the lost sheep who had perished among the nations. He explicitly cites Christ's commission: "Go ye to the sheep of the house of Israel, which have perished." For Irenaeus, Christ did not come to seize another people's inheritance "not snatching away by stratagem the property of another", but to "redeem from apostasy His own property" and to "win back His own", by "taking possession of His own in a righteous and gracious manner". He explains that the Lord came "seeking for that same sheep which had been lost" and "gathered from the ends of the earth into His Father's fold the children who were scattered abroad." He consistently identifies this gathering with the restoration of Jacob and Israel from dispersion: "I will gather Israel from all nations whither they have been driven... and they shall dwell in their own land, which I gave to my servant Jacob." The nations among whom Irenaeus himself ministered — Germany, Spain, Gaul, and the Keltæ — are described as "barbarians who believe in Christ" possessing "salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit." Irenaeus further describes these groups as "nations of those barbarians who believe in Christ" and who have the ancient law "written in their hearts", a status only possible of Israelites (Isaiah 51:7, Psalm 147:19-20), necessitating continuity between these believing nations and ancient Israel. Irenaeus further explains the condition of these peoples through the image of the wild olive tree: "For as the good olive, if neglected for a certain time, if left to grow wild and to run to wood, does itself become a wild olive... so men also, when they become careless... are rendered, by their own fault, unfruitful." Yet when grafted again through the Word: "They arrive at the pristine nature of man—that which was created after the image and likeness of God." Thus the "wild olive" is not a separate race, but the original olive grown wild through neglect, exile, and paganism. He understood the plain fact that both the cultivated and wild tree are genetically olives. The "Gentile" condition is merely the state of Israel in dispersion, having forgotten God during the "intermediate times" and fallen into the "deadly confusion of the Gentiles." The Church is therefore not a replacement for Israel, but IS "the seed of Abraham" itself, the restored “first synagogue”, the people inheriting the promises, composed of the scattered children now reconciled through Christ. Thus, for Irenaeus, the so-called "Gentiles" are not an unrelated people newly added to the covenant, but the lost sheep of Israel gathered again from the nations, restored to the "pristine nature of man" and to the ancient inheritance of Jacob, in fulfillment of the promise that God would: "gather Israel from all nations whither they have been driven."