OSINT
описание
Feeds from prominent OSINT X/Twitter accounts. Brought to you by @conspiracy_feed
2 160
подписчиков
Охват к подписчикам
0,9%
ERR
Реакции к просмотрам
0,39%
3 на 50 постов
Пересылки к просмотрам
1,18%
9
Постов в день
147,3
всего 1 418
Где отзываются чаще
доля реакций к просмотрам- 16:21WarTranslated According to the FT, Rodney Mims Cook Jr., a close associate of US President Trump, recently held secret talks with Kremlin representatives. As journalists managed to discover, this involved a "secret diplomatic mission" initiated by the White House itself. The primary focus of both sides was the issue of ending the Russian-Ukrainian war. Cook Jr. declined to comment on his meetings with Russian officials, whether Trump had asked him to maintain these contacts, or if he would return there in the near future. Insiders claim that Cook Jr. received "comprehensive briefings" before attending the Kremlin chief's economic forum in St. Petersburg in June. It is known that Trump's associate met with Anton Kobyakov, a senior aide to Putin, though likely not exclusively with him. It is also known that during his presentation at the forum, Cook conveyed "warmest greetings from your friend, President Trump" to Putin. https://www.ft.com/content/d88a8878-425d-4225-bda4-576c6c42734e?syn-25a6b1a6=1 tweet10,00%
- 16:21Visioner 🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦⚡️ Moscow is threatening Britain with “inevitable consequences” as reports of British-made drones being used for Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia trigger another escalation in the Kremlin’s rhetoric toward London. The Russian Embassy accused Britain of deliberately choosing further escalation and directly facilitating Ukraine’s long-range campaign against targets on Russian territory. Moscow warned that the deeper Britain becomes involved and the greater its military assistance to Kyiv, the “higher the price” London will ultimately have to pay. Britain, however, has shown no intention of backing down, with Prime Minister Andy Burnham declaring that the UK will continue supporting Ukraine “100%.” Russia has issued similar threats repeatedly as Western restrictions on Ukrainian strikes have gradually weakened. For London, enabling Ukraine to destroy Russian military capabilities before they can be used against Ukrainian cities is increasingly viewed as part of supporting Kyiv’s legitimate self-defense. Moscow’s threats therefore appear unlikely to reverse British policy and may instead reinforce the argument that Ukraine needs greater long-range capabilities to impose higher costs on Russia’s war machine. See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo tweet5,26%
- 17:22Visioner ‼️🇺🇦🚀 Ukraine’s future FP-9 Pelikan could become one of the most powerful weapons in Kyiv’s domestically produced long-range strike arsenal, combining ballistic speed with a massive warhead designed to destroy heavily protected targets deep inside Russia. Developed by Ukrainian defense company Fire Point, the FP-9 is designed for a range of up to 855 km, with an 800-kg warhead and claimed accuracy of around 20 meters. The missile is expected to reach speeds of approximately 2,200 m/s and altitudes of up to 70 km, making interception significantly more demanding than with conventional cruise missiles. If Fire Point succeeds in moving the FP-9 into serial production at meaningful scale, Ukraine would gain an independent ballistic strike capability capable of threatening Russian airfields, command centers, ammunition depots and military-industrial facilities hundreds of kilometers beyond the frontline. More importantly, unlike Western-supplied missiles, a domestically produced system would leave Kyiv with far greater freedom over where and how its long-range weapons are employed. See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo tweet3,85%
- 18:23Visioner 🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ The Pentagon is reconsidering the very architecture of America’s military presence in the Persian Gulf after the war with Iran exposed how vulnerable large, fixed U.S. bases have become to precision missile and drone attacks. According to The Washington Post, military planners are considering reducing forces at some Gulf bases and redistributing personnel and capabilities farther west, including toward Jordan, Israel and Saudi Arabia, rather than fully rebuilding every damaged facility. The scale of the problem is significant: a previous Washington Post satellite investigation documented at least 228 structures or pieces of military equipment damaged or destroyed across 15 U.S. military sites by Iranian strikes. The lesson for Washington extends beyond Iran. Massive, concentrated bases are increasingly becoming expensive targets in an era of cheap drones, ballistic missiles and precision strike systems. A more dispersed U.S. posture could make American forces harder to target while preserving their ability to rapidly project power across the Middle East. If implemented, the shift would represent one of the most consequential lessons the Pentagon has drawn from the Iran war: regional dominance increasingly depends not just on how much firepower America deploys, but on how difficult that firepower is for an adversary to find and destroy. See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo tweet0,00%
- 18:23без подписи0,00%
- 18:22Disclose.tv JUST IN - Bill Rasmussen, who founded ESPN and reshaped how America watches sports, has died at 93 — ESPN https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/2089744853072515249/photo/1 tweet0,00%
- 18:22WarTranslated Russia rules out the possibility of "freezing" the conflict with Ukraine along the line of contact, according to Ushakov. tweet0,00%
- 18:22Open Source Intel UPDATE: The IDF carried out an airstrike targeting several Hamas commanders in Gaza City’s al Shati area. According to the IDF, the operatives were planning attacks against Israeli forces in Gaza and were struck to eliminate the immediate threat. https://twitter.com/Osint613/status/2089742831132758409/photo/1 tweet0,00%
- 17:52OSINTtechnical The US is assessing is whether to pull back troops from the Persian Gulf after bases were battered by Iranian attacks during hostilities -WaPo The head of CENTCOM reportedly supports deliberations about potentially moving U.S. troops west from the Persian Gulf, away from Iran. tweet0,00%
- 17:52Open Source Intel Israeli flags spotted in an IDF controlled area of southern Lebanon. (Hezbollah claimed to be Lebanon’s protector.) https://twitter.com/Osint613/status/2089741515853623662/video/1 tweet0,00%
- 17:52Faytuks News A US troop removal from the area around the Persian Gulf has been one of Iran's demands in talks with the americans The Pentagon is evaluating whether to reduce its military presence in the Middle East after the Iran war, with one key area being a potential pullback from the Persian Gulf, where bases have been battered by strikes, according to The Washington Post. - Faytuks Network tweet0,00%
- 17:52Open Source Intel WaPo Claims: A potential pullback from the Persian Gulf is under review as the Pentagon weighs cutting its Middle East footprint after the Iran war, with bases in the region battered by strikes. tweet0,00%