Doctors Against Mandates, Australia

“On August 5, a United States federal court did something no Australian court has ever done for a medical practitioner: it told the government, in plain terms, that it does not own the speech of doctors. In Kory v. Bonta, Judge William Shubb enjoined California’s Attorney General and medical boards from investigating or prosecuting physicians for the professional opinions they share with their patients about Covid-19, vaccines, and treatment. The judgment contains a sentence every Australian health bureaucrat should be made to read aloud: The boards ‘may not dress up a viewpoint prosecution as a “standard of care” or “informed consent” case’.” https://www.spectator.com.au/2026/08/australias-doctors-need-their-kory-moment/

"Bed Rest Few totalitarised narratives can beat strictly enforced bed rest. John Herrick described myocardial infarction in 1912 and he knew immediately what to do – enforce strict bed rest. It would rapidly become a 6 week absolute - the time taken for a broken bone to heal. Endorsed by experts and their peers, enforced rest would claim millions of lives. More lives than lost to active service in both WW I and WW II. Most remarkable in the five decades – up until the 1960s - no one noticed. No randomised controlled clinical trials were needed, as the instructions were self-evidently correct. Until an Apollo space preparation brought strict bed rest experiments to healthy volunteers, the medical profession were enthralled for half a century.11 Bernard Lown (1921 – 2021), worked tirelessly to counter mass medical narrative. Original developer of the defibrillator and cardioverter (1962), he revolutionised resuscitation and rhythm management; he co-founded International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (Nobel Peace Prize, 1985), and he pioneered mobilisation after myocardial infarction. He is remembered as a visionary physician; he fully understood the absence of controlled clinical trials for coronary artery graft surgery and he rarely referred." https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/IMIKZXANPUQQJFP8N5TV/full

“One of the most important statements on scientific inquiry and public health to emerge in 2026 has come from Akiko Iwasaki at Yale University. Professor Iwasaki has been at the forefront of research into Long COVID, microclots, and post-vaccine syndromes, while also speaking openly about the barriers researchers can face when investigating complex or controversial health conditions. In a recent piece for Nature Reviews Immunology, she argues that science advances by confronting difficult questions, not avoiding them. As she writes: “The field has repeatedly been shaped by ideas that at first seemed divisive but later became foundational. The future of immunology depends on our collective effort to safeguard the freedom of inquiry with the same passion we have for scientific integrity.” Professor Iwasaki later shared that she wrote the piece “to promote thoughtful, respectful, and rational engagement with controversial science topics” and hoped it would encourage constructive dialogue within the scientific community. Open scientific discourse is not a threat to public health. In fact, public trust depends on it. People are more likely to trust institutions that are willing to ask difficult questions, investigate harms transparently, and engage respectfully with uncertainty when it exists. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-026-01306-1” Credit to independent vaccine injury advocacy group, COVERSE: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BtWeLvUZ6/

“… Moderna's new mRNA COMBINED Flu and Covid injection....the first in the world - mRNA 1083 The European Commission has just given it approval and it will soon be rolled out in Europe. Just a couple of small details to be aware of 1) EFFICACY OF mRNA 1083 HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED AND WARRANTS FUTURE INVESTIGATION 2) Of the 2011 participants who received the new Moderna combined vax: *239 had an adverse event *15 severe adverse events *18 serious *132 needed medical attention The study authors then carefully assessed all the adverse events and came to the following conclusion: *only 16 of the adverse events were related to the vaccine ZERO of the SEVERE or SERIOUS adverse events were caused by the vaccine *only 3 of the 132 events that needed medical attention were actually related to the vaccine Oh one more thing you should know.... The study that was used to receive the product authorisation in Europe was conducted by Moderna themselves. Oh and you should also know that 17 of the 19 scientists who had access to the raw data, .....HOLD SHARES IN MODERNA 100% of the study authors who performed the statistical analysis of the data HOLD SHARES IN MODERNA Study here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2833668” From True Stories from the Health forum NZ https://www.facebook.com/share/p/181FozVSQi/

"If regulatory resources are diverted toward policing professional speech rather than investigating unsafe clinical practice, the risk is obvious: the system begins protecting reputations instead of protecting patients." https://www.spectator.com.au/2026/03/silence-the-doctors-harm-the-children-when-ethics-becomes-dissent/

"Various regions of Australia displaying excess mortality were identified, and then the plausibility of three explanantia were considered in turn: COVID-19, the lockdowns, and COVID-19 vaccines." "4 of Australia’s 8 major regions excess mortality was present, correlating with rapid and thorough COVID-19 vaccination programs, before mass exposure to COVID-19, and in the absence of lengthy and highly restrictive lockdowns." The causes of Australian excess deaths in 2021, and beyond: An ecological study considering COVID-19, the lockdowns, and the vaccines https://doi.org/10.1177/092464792614267

Study from genomics expert explains why some regulators might be missing the high DNA contamination within the lots. “Together these results indicate that residual DNA testing which relies on a single qPCR for dsDNA fails to accurately quantify impurities, and that treating vaccine preparations with DNase I-XT during the manufacturing process may improve the quality by reducing contamination due to RNA:DNA hybrids.” https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v02n01a04/

There was a recent update to the Vax Injury Class Action, they are pushing onwards! “ Covid Vaccine Class Action Happy New Year and Brief Update- 5 January 2026 Good afternoon to all of the generous supporters of the Covid class action,    I hope that everyone was able to enjoy a peaceful Christmas and New Year period.  This email is by way of a brief update on the progress of the class action. Summary-     The action is ongoing and group members can continue to fill in the expression of interest form to join at the website www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au The past months have continued to be extremely busy, with work towards completing a new statement of claim, seeking advice from senior counsel and discussions with potential new solicitors.   The new judge, Justice Owens, has recently made orders for the timetable for this next stage, these orders are attached to this email.  The orders are: 1. The Applicants are to apply for leave to file any fourth further amended statement of claim by 4pm on 27 February 2026. 2. The proceeding be listed for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 13 March 2026. Counsel have been engaged to complete the new statement of claim and appear on 13 March.   For anyone who has recently donated I have made a brief summary below of the matter to date.  I would like to take this opportunity to again sincerely thank all of the generous donors who have supported and continue to support this important action and it is my great hope that despite all the challenges that this will eventually bring some truth, justice and accountability for what has happened to so many.   This could never have happened without your support- Thank you Progress to date- (See also listing at https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/NSD349/2023/actions)  1.  26 April 2023- Case filed in Federal Court.  Three lead applicants (Anthony Rose, Gareth O'Grady and Antonio Derose). Statement of claim alleged negligence and misfeasance against four public officials responsible for the vaccines approval, role-out and related duties- Brendon Murphy, Paul Kelly, John Skerrit and Greg Hunt.   2.  17 June 2024- The respondents filed an interlocutory application requesting summary dismissal, strike out of the statement of claim and requesting costs security.  3.  2 December 2024- Hearing held in Sydney for the interlocutory application.  4.  10 April 2025- Judgement handed down on the interlocutory application; this can be found at   https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0339    The judgement was that the statement of claim was struck out entirely, and the applicants are required to seek leave, or permission from the court, to file a new statement.  The judgement was extremely critical of the claim document, and the next business day NR Barbi solicitors withdrew from representing.    An opinion was sought regarding appealing the decision of Justice Katzmann but ultimately we did not go ahead with an appeal.  A new judge has since been allocated to the matter, Justice Owens, following Justice Katzmann's retirement soon after her judgement was handed down.   Although it has been difficult to navigate this past 9 months I am confident that it is very close to being able to engage a new legal team and to have a new statement of claim that will be acceptable by the court.  I am entirely committed to continuing to fund this important legal action and once again my most heartfelt gratitude to all of you who have generously donated to make this all possible- Thank you all so much.  https://www.nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuries/ I will provide a further update once the leave application is made and after the case management meeting.  Take care everyone,   Warm regards,    Dr Mel “ Please donate and share to help Dr McCann and many injured Aussies https://www.nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuries/

Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12767256/ “Both vaccine patient groups displayed widespread transcriptional dysregulation. In the nonmalignant adverse event group, hallmark enrichments included mitochondrial dysfunction, proteasome-mediated stress, transcriptomic instability, and systemic inflammation. The cancer group exhibited additional hallmarks of genomic instability and epigenetic reprogramming.”

For those unable to attend, find the book launch recording for public viewing here: https://amps.redunion.com.au/covidthroughoureyesbooklaunch

Event Tonight, around Sunshine Coast, QLD.

"To properly determine whether COVID-19 vaccines were ultimately net beneficial or harmful—particularly for low-risk populations—long-term studies comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are urgently needed. At present, the evidence suggests that for the young and healthy, these vaccines may have done more harm than good. Until such evidence is thoroughly explored, broad recommendations based on these compromised studies should be approached with great caution. " https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N04A08

Break-down of recent Lancet study from Coverse AU doctor: " You may have all seen the latest paper doing the rounds, from The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health: "Vascular and inflammatory diseases after COVID-19 infection and vaccination in children and young people in England: a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked electronic health records” https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00247-0 The study concludes that "higher risk of rare myocarditis or pericarditis … although the risk following vaccination is substantially lower than the risk following infection.” However, a quick glance at the methods clearly show that they look at Covid infections between 1 January 2020 - 31 March 2022, but vaccines during 6 August 2021 - 31 December 2022. Those of you with critical thinking skills (hopefully all), will astutely notice that their period of study for Covid infections includes the much more dangerous Wuhan, Alpha, and Delta strains, whereas the bulk of the period of study for the vaccines encompasses the early Omicron era. Nowhere in the body of the paper do they mention this mismatch. They do elude to having done sensitivity analysis on different Covid eras, but nowhere in the text is this presented or discussed further. You have to go deep into the supplementary material to find this data. And what does their own data actually show? When they limit the study window for Covid infections to June 2021 - March 2022 (not ideal, but certainly more appropriate than in their main analysis), we see that the risk of mypcarditis/pericarditis from Pfizer’s vaccine is double that from infections. But even this adverse risk is undercooked, since Omicron did not appear in the UK landscape until late November 2021, hence even their later study window demonstrates an unrealistic risk from Covid infection. Sadly, usual domestic (Australian) suspects are pushing this study in the media (e.g. https://www.9news.com.au/health/covid-19-vaccines-lower-heart-inflammation-risk-infection/76689039-9ecf-434a-9abb-dd25c2107b5f). Either they didn’t read the paper properly, or they are deliberately lying to the public. Rado Faletic, PhD. "

More evidence of genomic integration in tumour biopsy, a case report: “Within circulating tumor DNA, a host–vector chimeric read mapped to chr19:55,482,637–55,482,674 (GRCh38), in cytoband 19q13.42, positioned ~367 kb downstream of the canonical AAVS1 safe harbor and ~158 kb upstream of ZNF580 at the proximal edge of the zinc-finger (ZNF) gene cluster. This sequence aligned with perfect 20/20 bp identity to a segment (bases 5905–5924) within the Spike open reading frame (ORF) coding region (bases 3674–7480) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 DNA plasmid reference (GenBank accession OR134577.1), despite the patient only receiving Moderna vaccinations. This apparent paradox is best explained by shared Spike ORF sequences within the expression cassette across both vaccine platforms; because Moderna has not deposited its proprietary plasmid sequence in NCBI, BLAST defaults to Pfizer’s published reference as the nearest available match.” Who knows, maybe Pfizer will use this as evidence of Moderna using its IP. Concerning in any case. https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130

“In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancer types, including thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Notably, this COVID-19 vaccination-associated cancer risk was likely more elevated among individuals aged ≤ 65 years except in individuals with prostate cancer. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.” https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

Sign the petition: https://www.mwm-proof.com/de/unterzeichnen/ Read more about it (translation required) https://www.mwm-proof.com/

"A Step-by-Step Evaluation of the Claim That COVID-19 Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives" By Yaakov Ophir*,1, Yaffa Shir-Raz2, Shay Zakov3, Raphael Lataster4, Peter A. McCullough "To understand how such an unsupported narrative could emerge and dominate, Step 4 traces the direct mechanisms behind its rise: methodological flaws (4.1), misrepresentation and misinterpretation of f indings (4.2, 4.3), and suppression of dissenting voices (4.4). By focusing on transient signals of success while overlooking concerns about efficacy and safety, a fragile assertion appears to have solidified into a widely accepted belief that shaped global health policy." https://cdn.fortunejournals.com/articles/a-step-by-step-evaluation-of-the-claim-that-covid-19-vaccines-saved-millions-of-lives-6254.pdf