Estrada Para Thule

Do Jews Control the World? First of all, it's necessary to point out that Jews occupy positions of power disproportionately to the portion of the population they represent. This isn't a conspiracy theory or "antisemitism"; just look at the ethnicity of billionaires, CEOs of large companies, politicians, and judges (at least in the United States; this may be different in other countries). However, saying that Jews control the world isn't the correct way to approach this issue. Firstly, it's a vague statement; instead of naming Jewish billionaires, you point to mysterious entities that control the world in an unspecified way. Furthermore, speaking in global terms is an exaggeration; saying that Jews control the United States is something that can be easily contested. It's necessary to address these contradictions specifically, such as the fact that the main pornography platforms in the West, Pornhub and OnlyFans, have had Jewish CEOs. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is also not a good argument or starting point for debate. Even if the plans described therein did occur to some extent, the book is considered a forgery and is far removed from reality. Claiming that societies worldwide are being shaped according to decisions made at secret dinners many years ago is nonsensical, as even Jewish transnational organizations sometimes openly share their plans and fail to implement them as they would like. The topic of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is extensive and requires a dedicated text. My final point is that the assertion that Jews control the world is demoralizing and acts as a "black pill," a paralyzing psyop. After all, if Jews control the entire world and are so powerful, how could we possibly do anything about it? Wouldn't the only solution simply be to accept it?

Subscribe on our new Substack: https://substack.com/@thuleansun

War • Art • Aesthetic • Epic • Glorious

Green Ray Sonnenrad design

The Transgender Question First of all, it is necessary to state the obvious: there are only two sexes, male and female (not "genders"), and a person cannot change their nature or their sex. After this initial point, we can address the topic itself. In metaphysics, masculine and feminine are two parts of a duality and complement each other. The masculine has an active, "electric" aspect of energy, of transformative capacity, and an expansive aspect (so much so that the male genital organ extends outside the body), while the feminine metaphysical principle is passive, "magnetic" in the sense of attraction, and has an introspective aspect (taking the same example, the female genital organ expands into the woman's body). Being a man or a woman is not a matter of social constructs or merely the result of hormonal action, but rather the emanation of metaphysical principles as designed by nature. Acting like a woman and taking female hormones does not turn a man into a woman, as these principles are imprinted in every part of the being. Regarding gender roles: Despite biological characteristics, the sexual division of human societies is also composed of roles and customs specific to men and women. These customs and roles are not unfounded; they are based on biological differences. Taking traditional societies as an example, women took care of household chores while men went out to work. Again, this demonstrates the metaphysical duality of men acting outside the home and women inside. But in practical terms, men risk their lives in the world while women work protected at home, lacking the physical and mental strength to defend themselves. Men and women also use different accessories, clothing, and ways of behaving. These are social constructs not imposed by nature, and throughout history there have always been cases of the inversion of these roles, such as a court jester dressing as a woman for comedic purposes. However, society never treated the transvestite as a woman. Over time, emulation techniques have evolved; transvestites undergo complex surgeries and aesthetic procedures, but this does not alter the metaphysical principles that permeate all of human biology. Regarding this topic, I recommend reading the book "Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex" by Julius Evola. I still intend to develop the topic further, perhaps writing an article about it, bringing some news and studies about transgender people, as well as quotes from Evola's book, but this takes time that I don't have available at the moment. Thank you for your attention.

Sonnenrad design

Bad pro-immigration Arguments Perhaps I'll write a more comprehensive article about it, but in any case, I'd like to leave my response to arguments in favor of immigration that I constantly hear and that are flawed. 1. “Immigrants do the jobs that Americans and Europeans don't want to do.” For the vast majority of the history of the United States and Europe, native-born citizens performed heavy and dangerous labor. Only recently have they begun employing immigrant labor. Native-born citizens do not want to work without being paid FAIRLY for it; immigrants accept these jobs for low wages and without demanding labor rights. Otherwise, employers would have no reason to hire an immigrant instead of an American or European. By restricting immigration, the government forces companies to hire native-born citizens and pay decent wages. 2. ”They are simply people seeking a better life and fleeing wars.” Despite "seeking a better life," immigrants generally go to the United States and wealthier European countries, when they could go to neighboring countries or other parts of their countries of origin. A good example in South America is that Chile and Uruguay are countries with low crime rates and relatively stable economies, but immigrants from surrounding countries in crisis prefer to go to the United States, Portugal, and Spain. The same is true for refugees from Palestine and Afghanistan; there are several other Arab countries that are not at war and where they could have a normal life. A large portion of immigrants who move to first-world countries, if not the majority, wish to become wealthy and have material abundance, not just to escape wars or dictatorships. 3. “No one is illegal on stolen land“ I don't know if it can be considered an argument, but I think it deserves a response. Resentful immigrants use the fact that their countries were colonized in the past to justify invading other countries by boat or crossing the border with Mexico. It's an invasion, and these are illegal immigrants without documents, without a history; there's no way to know who these people are. They could be rapists and murderers fleeing justice in their countries; there's no way to know. This type of immigration is also harmful to the countries from which the immigrants come because there is no kind of control. Finally, there is nothing "extremist" about being against immigration or supporting immigration control policies; there is nothing "Nazi" about it. Nobody wants immigrants to be killed in gas chambers, only that they return to their countries of origin. Are immigrants suffering from wars and dictatorships? Americans and Europeans have nothing to do with that; they have their own problems to solve. Is an illegal immigrant crying because she has been separated from her children? That's sad, but she is to blame for it; she chose to invade another country knowing she could be arrested or deported.

The Trap of “Who is White?” Question From time to time, in online forums and groups, I see this question arise: who is "white," and some people argue that Greeks, Italians, Portuguese, and Spaniards are not actually white. But this debate itself is a trap, and I will explain why. Classifying people as "white" already presupposes a diverse and multi-racial society. If all people were white, there would be no point in identifying as such; they would be classified according to the region of the country or the tribe to which they belong. It is also an imposed classification, so there is no point in debating what it ideally would be, only identifying what it means according to the people who impose it. An Italian or Spaniard cannot choose to identify as anything other than white; they will be classified as such and blamed for slavery and excluded from various sectors of society in the name of diversity through affirmative action policies. "White" is a classification applied to Indo-European peoples within an oppressor-oppressed logic; Americans are blamed for being "imperialist," Germans for the Holocaust, the British, Portuguese, and Spanish for colonization and slavery, Italians for the conquests of the Roman Empire, and so on. They are the "kingdom of Edom" and the "Amalekites" in the minds of those who promote this oppressor-oppressed ideology in society. After this reflection, being "white" may sound like a curse, but it is precisely the opposite. When all European people around the world are attacked, they unite. Small differences no longer matter; French, British, whites in the United States, Brazil, Argentina, and South Africa fight side by side to avoid being replaced by minorities and to continue existing. Hundreds of millions of people around the planet united to win and prosper!

Why Gematria is not Bullshit I'm preparing an article on gematria; I have many ideas to organize, but I'll leave some preliminary points on this subject here. By "gematria" we can understand the techniques of assigning numerical values ​​to letters and forming new interpretations of words and phrases. An important point here is that gematria provides new perspectives on words, new interpretations; trying to "decode" the universe is a folly of many people who practice gematria—that's not the goal. The ciphers and meanings of numbers vary; the fact that a word results in "666" after a gematria process does not mean that such a word is a reference to the devil or "Lucifer." Within any spiritual-religious system that believes words were revealed by God (or gods), we could use gematria to find more relationships between words, new interpretations, and perhaps even the most "correct" ways to translate spoken words into written words.

Enquanto preparamos outros artigos, escrevemos um texto sobre o que é energia Vril, com fontes e sem entrar em bigodismo ou temas complicados: https://open.substack.com/pub/institutobaldur/p/o-que-e-vril?r=4jc4dz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Baldr My first drawing from the Æsir pantheon depicts Baldr, the bright son of Óðinn and Frigg. He stands in Breiðablik, where nothing impure may enter, thus he wears no shoes which may track in debris from outside. Though he is spoken of as a brave and renowned warrior, his sword is sheathed as a sign of peace, and his shield—adorned with a sonnenrad—rests at his side. In his hand, he holds a scentless mayweed, also known as "Baldr's brow," for its whiteness. Overhead hangs the mistletoe, the only material from which a weapon could be crafted to slay him (and which we now kiss under to amend slights before they fester and threaten our frith). The weapon in question—an arrow—is present but broken, for even though Baldr is slain, he returns to the realms of the living when Ragnarök has passed.

Great hyperborean articles in portuguese on Instituto Baldur, check out their substack: https://substack.com/@institutobaldur