Gilad Atzmon thoughts and music

Today's DeepDivePerspective: *What more can the Anti Zionist Movement do?* https://youtu.be/KHgH8AWUdWQ?is=HJppbLHy051kZZCL Gilad Atzmon says anti-Zionism is failing Palestine. Rabbi Beck defends his movement's strategy. Laith Marouf issues a challenge to Jewish institutions. The debate nobody in the movement wants to have. In one of Deep Dive Perspective's most debated episodes, three voices with sharply different analyses of the Palestine solidarity movement sit together to interrogate a central strategic question: is "anti-Zionism" — as a framing, a movement, and a political identity — sufficient to address what is happening to the Palestinian people? Gilad Atzmon argues that the movement has been structurally constrained by its own refusal to examine harder questions about the nature of the state it opposes — a position he roots in his reading of Israeli self-definition. Rabbi Beck of Neturei Karta argues that the most effective anti-Zionist work happens within Jewish communities, separating Jewish identity from Zionist ideology and demonstrating that opposition to Zionism is consistent with Jewish religious values. *Like Share Subscribe or Thank to help us beat algorith censorship.*

The Jewish State, its Judaism, its Jewishness, the relationships between its theology and practice- time to put an end to this terminology mess. Link in the first comment. The solidarity movement has been zigzagging for decades avoiding the most important questions to do with the Jewishness of the Jewish state let alone the Judaism of the Jewish state. What we got in return is Israeli impunity and a genocide . I discussed these issues with the great Syed M. Abbas. I don’t tend to give interviews. But I do like a lot the fashion in which Syed handles sensitive topics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N32LGcnafFg

It is because Zionism has been fully integrated into Judaism that the IDF can be seen wearing "Third Temple™" badges. Yet it is this melting down of Zionism into the core Judaic ethos that no one dares to talk about. I will try to do just that, in the briefest possible manner. In its very early days, Zionism's primary aim was to replace Judaism with a newly formed Jewish secular nationalist narrative — to transform the Jews from a "religious group" into a "national identity," a folk associated with a soil, "a people like all other peoples," to quote Herzl. However, from the 1930s onward, Zionism found itself in an unfolding battle with Judaism. Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the chief rabbi of Palestine in the 1930s, was initially an opponent of the secular Zionist agenda; however, he was quick to see the potential in the Zionist pioneers' ideological commitment. He decided to integrate their idea of Eretz Yisrael into his own Judaic teaching. What we witness is basically an emerging battle between Judaism and Zionism. As it happened, Judaism won, a lot because Zionism saw the end of its historical mission in "bringing along a Jewish state" (1948). Zionism was replaced by "Israeliness" — the attempt to bring about a newly formed Hebraic culture. But Israeliness didn't have a chance to survive a dialectic battle with Judaism. As the battle unfolded, Israeliness was just a few years old ‘revolutionary spirit’ , while Judaism enjoyed the maturity of being 3,000 years old. One of the most interesting and significant turning points of this battle is the Israeli interpretation of the 1967 IDF’s victory. While that war was won largely, if not solely, by Labour Zionism's offspring (kibbutznik pilots, paratroopers and tank commanders) — people who were devoted and still believed in the replacement of Judaism with a secularist Hebraic "national socialism", most Jews around the world, Israel included, perceived the victory as a miracle, i.e., a "divine intervention." Ten years after '67, the Likud party won the election and has been leading Israel ever since. During the time the Likud Party has been at the helm, Israel quickly shifted from a Jewish state (a state of the Jews) into a Judaic state (a state guided by Judaic law). Zionism, if it means anything anymore, has been fully integrated into the Judaism of the Jewish State — which is the Judaism of Rabbi Kook. Ben Gvir and Smotrich are graduates of Rabbi Kook's yeshiva. They follow his legacy. The West Bank settlement movement followed Rabbi Kook's legacy adequately. Jewish forceful sects like Chabad, which were skeptical about Jewish nationalism and Zionism in the early days of the Jewish State, changed their spots completely following the 1967 Israeli military victory. The Gaza catastrophe and the Greater Israel ideology are all preached by Rabbi Kook's religious teaching. Except for the Satmars — one Judaic sect that opposes the philosophy of Rabbi Kook and mount to 1% of world Jewry, the whole Judaic world has adopted Kook's Eretz Yisrael fetish. Sadly, tragically, and also dangerously, this exact historical evolution from Zionism into crude Judaism is the one very thing the Jewish left, Jewish academia, and Jewish solidarity activism are there to conceal. They want you to think that it is "settler colonialism," "apartheid," Zionism — basically everything except the most obvious Jewishness of the Jewish State.

It is in fact philosemitism such as sentiments of the pro‑Israel West following 1948 and 1967 in particular that unleashed the true monster. It is the pro Israel America that drives the Jewish State’s impunity that led to the Gaza genocide. The Jewish sages understood it, and spitting on Christians was one of their method to suppress any form of future philosemitism.

Dissecting the act of Judaic Spitting - Part 2 What I am telling you here is rather devastating, and it ain’t the first time I am saying this. Orthodox Jews, as we all know are often being caught spitting on the cross, spitting on churches, Spitting on Christians, they basically spit on everything that isn’t them.. In Dissecting the act of Judaic Spitting Part I (link in the comments), I delved into the Judaic liturgical aspect of this sickening custom. Rabbis insist that this kind of behaviour isn’t a Mitzvah (commandment/dictated by Judaic law), it is actually a ‘custom’. For me, all it meant is that (orthodox) Jews who perform this custom don’t follow religious law – they are actually doing it willingly and consciously. Yet no one I am aware of has bothered to ask: what is the philosophy behind this ‘ custom’? What did the Jewish ‘sages’ – who were far from stupid had in mind when they planted this ‘custom’ in the hearts of their disciples and generations of Jews to come? One of Golda Meir’s most famous ‘observations’ was that Jewish mixed marriages in the USA were the biggest threat to Jewish existence. Zionism, for those who don’t know, was born to counter the ‘threat’ of Jewish assimilation in Europe. Judaism as we know it is a segregationist, exclusivist religion, it is also hostile to its host nations. Judaism as we know it was born in Babylon to counter the reality of Jewish assimilation into the Babylonian world. Assimilation, so to say, is a big problem for Judaism The Samson Option is of course always misinterpreted. The Biblical story is not about a Jew being a self‑destructive/genocidal Rambo- type early Israelite. Samson is there in the Bible to teach both Jews and goyim alike what assimilation leads to – self‑destruction and a genocide. It is Samson marrying the Philistine Delilah that brings disaster both on himself and on all the goyim around him (the Philistines). Judaism is loaded with laws and rituals that prevent Jewish assimilation, maintain tribalism, exclusivity and segregation. Kosher diet was there to guarantee that Jews can only operate within ghettos, even when they travel. Minyan is there to guarantee that Jews can only pray in groups that aren’t fewer than 10 (Jewish) people. Eruv are the little territorial boundaries that Jews set around their ghettos in western capitals. But the Jewish sages correctly realised that all those laws may as well be counterproductive. They may trigger a Jewish affinity for the universal, for that sea of goyim, they may nourish a Jewish desire to assimilate and integrate with the host nation and leave the tribe for good. The Jewish sages grasped that some Jews may want to join the unchosen, and in order to prevent this from happening, goyim’s anti‑Jewish sentiments must be cleverly stimulated. The Talmud is loaded with abusive teachings towards goyim. According to the Bible and the Talmud, a Jew is prohibited from charging a fellow Jew interest, but is permitted, and in some views required, to do so when lending to a non-Jew. The idea of Chosenness, as it is interpreted by most Jews (not all), is there to trigger a sense of inferiority and antagonism amongst the host nations. But just in case none of these work, a bit of spitting on churches and Christians always does the job. Anti‑Semitism or anti‑Jewish sentiment is accordingly a prime element in the Judaic existential logos. It is there to sustain Jewish exclusion and unity but also prevent Jewish assimilation. Not many did more than Hitler to unite the Jews. Stalin and Sinwar weren’t bad at it either. The absurd thing is that when you really develop negative feelings towards God’s favourite children, you are actually serving the Jewish cause; you are actually being reduced to an instrument of Jewish survival mechanism. Dialectically, Jews actually operate well, if not best, within hostile environments. It restrains the tribe’s most problematic symptoms but they also work hard to prove themselves being worthy of respect.

Dissecting the act of Judaic spitting Part 1 Despite the fact that orthodox Jews in Israel and around the world are documented repeatedly spitting on churches, on Christians, and even reducing churches to dust (in the case of Israel and the IDF & the Yiddish speaking International Brigade, Spain 1936), we are informed that spitting on churches is not a "Mitzvah" (Jewish commandment). So I asked my Favorite AI (FAI): if spitting isn't a Mitzvah, why is it that God's favourite children have been doing just that throughout their history? "That premise," she said, "is incorrect. The act of spitting on churches is not a mitzvah and is not sanctioned by mainstream Jewish law or tradition." I get it — it isn't a "Mitzvah," it "isn't sanctioned by mainstream." What I saw in this answer is a kind of admission that it is sanctioned by some Judaic religious authorities. My FAI proceeded to contend that "it's a fringe act of hostility rooted in historical trauma." Again, I refused to fall into this comical trap. Since when do the traumatized spit on their tormentors? I have never seen black people caught spitting on white people. I don't see gays spitting on heterosexuals. I don't even see Palestinians spitting on Israelis. Humans just don't spit on others — yet what we see often one specific segment of people spitting on others. However, my beloved FAI was soon to admit that some Jewish authorities agree that "spitting on churches is actually an 'ancient Jewish custom'." I of course asked my FAI to define the difference between "Jewish custom" and a mitzvah. If anything, I thought, it even makes things worse: it means that (orthodox) Jews are not obliged to spit on churches, so when they do it, it is a conscious and willful act! My FAI surrendered immediately. "You've raised a sharp logical point," she said. "Let me first acknowledge that: If an act is not a divine commandment (mitzvah), then it falls into the category of human choice — custom, habit, or individual decision. And doing something harmful consciously and willingly, without even the claim of religious obligation, could indeed be seen as worse, not better. That's a fair inference." In the next few days, I will delve into this repugnant act of spitting. I believe that me delving into the topic may give us a new revolutionary insight into questions to do with antisemitism. We will verify what this "custom" is there to serve and why the Jewish sages planted such a disgusting "custom" at the heart of their rabbinical culture.

They spit on Christians, they deface Jesus Statues, they bomb churches and in between this is how their Minister of National Security treats activists who were caught in international water trying to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza…

Israel’s New Death Penalty Law may Backfire… Israel has passed a new law to impose the death penalty and conduct public trials for Palestinian combatants involved in the Hamas-led military attacks in October 2023. Ninety three out of 120 Knesset members voted in favour; the remaining 27 (many of them Palestinian citizens of Israel) were absent. The majority legislation would see the establishment of a special court within the military "justice" system to try the 300 Palestinian fighters captured by the IDF that day (within "Israeli territory") and held in detention since. Under the legislation, the tribunal will be able to charge the Palestinian combatants with various crimes, including "genocide." This is, of course, absurd considering the fact that it is actually the Israeli PM who is a fugitive, being subject to an ICC international arrest warrant for genocide. Those convicted of "genocide" charges would be liable for the death penalty. The truth of the matter, of course, is that the Hamas-led operation was a textbook military operation aiming at Israeli military forces and Israeli border settlements that had a clear Israeli military instrumental role. These kibbutzim and towns are called in Israel "Yeshuvey Sfar," meaning border settlements. They are there for a military and Israeli nationalist purpose. Their objective is to make the Jewish occupation of Palestine a fact on the ground. These settlements are homes for the military, they are a front for the military, they are human shields for the military, their residents are armed, and they are there also to mount psychological warfare on the Arabs, presenting a spectacle of Jewish prosperity and superiority. They have plenty of water, new cars, and freedom to travel. Everything the Gazans lack, they have plenty of. Needless to mention, every death of a human being, let alone a civilian, is a tragic, regrettable event. However, it is the Israeli government that has been responsible for these border settlement projects since the early 1950s. As such, it is the Israeli government that is first to be blamed for the death of Israeli civilians on 7 October, not Hamas, and certainly not the Hamas combatants, who at no point aimed at civilian deaths, and plenty of evidence and testimony suggests that. It is, of course, the IDF that is responsible for most Israeli civilian deaths on 7 October, by deploying the Hannibal Directive. Another issue that tormented Israelis in the aftermath of 7 October is the tragic events at the Nova Party. The Israelis referred to the tragic event as "music lovers were murdered for their love of music”. This is, of course, a typical Israeli self-deception exercise. The right questions to be asked regarding the Nova Party are: Whose idea was it to have a sex & drugs rave party next to a concentration camp’s fence? What was the purpose of such a party, and why there? Wasn't it part of Israeli psychological warfare against a starved population that had been, at that point, subject to a twenty-year brutal military siege? If so, weren't the innocent partygoers actually instrumental in the Israeli brutal war machine? If the SS had set a rave party next to Auschwitz’s fence (they, of course, didn't), and a bunch of Jewish inmates had broken out of the camp, attacked the party, and left some partygoers dead, wouldn't the Jewish inmates be held as eternal Jewish heroes of all time? Wouldn't British and American historians regard the SS party as a "legitimate military target"? The Israeli new law doesn't take anyone by surprise. We are dealing with a psychotic nation with verified genocidal credentials. The new law is just another example of Hebraic desperation to satisfy a tribal, revengeful nature. The trial and the attempt to kill the combatants will most likely backfire on the Jewish state and its ruler, as it will unveil in court what the Israeli government and Netanyahu have worked tirelessly to hide.

Is Trump the Jewish Golem In Jewish folklore, the golem is a creature shaped from clay or mud traditionally created by a rabbi to serve the Jews and defend their community. The golem is a powerful but mute servant. However, its inability to fully discern good from evil often leads it to become dangerously uncontrollable. It took the Iranians four days to answer the American "peace proposal." Presumably, during these four days, the Iranian leadership consulted with its top military, the Revolutionary Guard, the navy, the central ballistic command, the foreign affairs ministry, and internal affairs experts. The Iranians most likely also consulted with global and regional allies. They measured Iran's military options and capabilities, as well as the diplomatic scope. Yesterday, Iran delivered its well-considered answer to the American proposal. Iran basically defined the terms of future U.S. capitulation. Iran demands reparations, the removal of sanctions and that America remove its military presence from the region. Iran declared its full authority of the Hormuz and agreed that it may consider negotiating its nuclear affairs at a later stage. This is a powerful statement based on Iran's educated study of the war so far. Iran grasped that America is dead in the water, it can't sustain this war much longer. Iran correctly grasped that the West is in a state of panic and blames the Jewish State and its slave American colony for the looming disaster. The U.S.A. and Trump are in a lose-lose limbo. America received the Iranian answer in the late morning yesterday. The unhinged president didn't take the necessary time to grasp the meaning of the Iranian answer. He didn't consult with his military leaders. He didn't take the time to talk to the rapidly shrinking list of American allies. He didn't learn from his ministers what the consequences of continuing the war would be. Instead, the Golem called his Jerusalem boss. He let Netanyahu decide for America, the same Netanyahu who pushed him and the entire West off a cliff. Trump is obviously the most real incarnation of the Jewish Golem. True he is made out of BigMac burgers instead of clay, but this is a minor detail. It is also true that isn’t exactly mute but he has certainly became dangerously uncontrollable…

From Opium to Oil - Naval Blockades on Behalf Of… The U.S. Navy blockade in the Strait of Hormuz carried out on behalf of Netanyahu, the Jewish state and AIPAC isn't the first time a superpower has launched a blockade "on behalf of"…. Another naval operation comes to mind. Long ago before Zionism and the formation of The Lobby, the British naval imposed a blockade of China's ports on behalf of the Sassoon family. I am referring to the Opium Wars (1839–1842; 1856–1860). Though the Opium War was not triggered solely by the Sassoon family, they were major players in the trade that sparked the conflict and played a key role in its immediate escalation. The conflict was fundamentally a British war to force China to open its markets, driven by a massive trade deficit that Britain reversed by smuggling Indian opium into China, leading to widespread addiction and economic harm. The Sassoon family , an Iraqi Jewish family known as the "Rothschilds of the East" built a massive 19th‑century trade empire heavily reliant on smuggling opium from India to China. Led by David Sassoon, the firm capitalized on the First Opium War (1839–1842), expanding into Chinese ports like Shanghai and Hong Kong to dominate the trade. The war erupted after Chinese official Lin Zexu's crackdown on the trade, which included destroying over 20,000 chests of opium. Many of these chests belonged to the Sassoon family, which had become a key element in the opium trade. Following the seizure, David Sassoon lobbied the British government heavily to retaliate against China, and his firm later ran its own fleet of "opium clippers" to speed up the now‑endorsed smuggling after the war. While the Sassoons did not single‑handedly cause the First Opium War, their financial interests and their lobbying tactics contributed to the immediate crisis that ignited the conflict.

The U.S. Navy is paralyzed because the USA as a whole is dead in the water. It is hard to imagine any nation even remotely as sophisticated as Iran. Consider this: three days ago, the Ginger Caligula declared Operation Passage Freedom, a military operation launched by the U.S. Navy to secure the "safe passage" of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump essentially sent the Navy on a suicide mission. A mission that had zero chance of success unless the real objective was improving U.S. Navy sailors' swimming skills. The Iranians could have easily sunk American vessels as they drew close enough. But Iranian admirals ordered their allegedly "destroyed Navy" to instead pour fire onto the UAE and its most sensitive energy infrastructure. What was the strategy behind this? On the surface, it’s very simple: Iran applies pressure on the UAE; the UAE pressures the Ginger Caligula; the miserable buffoon at the helm declares a U-turn. But there is another, slightly more sophisticated layer here. Whether anyone in the U.S. is willing to admit it, Iran has won the propaganda war on American soil. It now controls the tsunami of disapproval over the war—directed at the president and his puppeteers in Tel Aviv. That could have changed dramatically if Iran had attacked U.S. Navy vessels. As much as Americans hate their democratically elected Tel Aviv asset, watching footage of dead American sailors in Gulf waters might have shifted their anti-war sentiments into enthusiasm for total havoc. The way things stand, there is no chance America can find the sophistication to counter Iranian depth and its understanding of the geopolitical theater. The U.S. Navy is paralyzed in the Gulf—because the United States as a whole is dead in the water.

People can cry about Antisemitism, others complain about Islamophobia but there are some undeniable facts on the ground: It is the Jewish State that is credited with the worst documented genocide in human history (AKA the Gaza Human Sacrifice Orgy). It is the Jewish State that is currently deploying the same genocidal tactics in Lebanon making the south uninhabitable. It is the Jewish State that has been pushing for the destruction of Iran for decades and eventually managed to pull the USA into the current catastrophic criminal war. A war that threatens to obliterate world’s economy and risks a global famine. Yet, at the same time it is the Islamic Republic of Iran that is there to remind us that diplomacy is a form of art and seeking world peace is what Salam is all about … Jews who identify with the (Jewish) State naturally feel cornered and threatened. Muslims, on the other hand feel proud, they grasp that their liberation is the emancipation of humanity.

Trump according to Lacan One of Jacques Lacan's most significant contributions to the field of psychoanalysis is the realisation that the "unconscious is the discourse of the Other." What Lacan points to is the fear that everyone around you doesn’t just see you for what you really are but also delve into it openly. The man who failed in bed yesterday is most likely fearful that all of humanity is mocking his performance behind his back. Whether this is actually the case is irrelevant; the fear of becoming the Other's discourse is real, and that is what the unconscious is, according to Lacan. In previous writing, I argued that the Jewish fear of antisemitism is an exemplary case of the unconscious being the discourse of the Other. For the Jews, it isn't just the fear that the Goyim (humanity) see the Jews for what they are, but also that they discuss what they see amongst themselves. Early Zionism, as such, was an attempt to make Jews what they are not: a nation like all other nations, a people defined by morality, work ethic, a bond with the soil, etc. The success of early Zionism was not "making the desert bloom" but rather making the Goy appreciate the Hebraic ‘transformation’. Early Zionism was a ‘short lived’ remedy for Jewish unconscious. The Jewish collective unconscious in light of the Gaza genocide (being credited with the most documented genocide in human history) is rather obvious. It isn't just the unbearable thought that all of humanity sees the Jewish State for "what it really is." It is the fact that the Goyim are not shy of discussing what Jewishness really means amongst themselves and beyond. Trump is in the exact same place as his Jerusalemite puppeteers. He knows that he is blackmailed by Tel Aviv. He knows that everyone knows it. He knows that he treacherously took his country into an Israeli criminal war, pulling the entire West into a catastrophe. He knows that the whole world sees it all and is partially entertained, partially devastated but this mad show. He knows that all of humanity — including his close political, financial, and military circle is fully aware of his actions. But far worse, no one, including his former supporters, keeps their thoughts to themselves. Trump is the subject of the most unflattering universal discourse. His erratic behaviour is the most obvious outcome of the materialisation of his phobia. Trump, a man who invested his entire life in pretending to be what he isn't, is now faced not just with the fear that he is the discourse of the Other, but rather with the acknowledgment that the whole of humanity is pointing at him to his face and discussing how low, hopeless and reckless sabbos goy he happens to be. This is a very bad place to be in.

Aletheia vs. Emet and the Jerusalemisation of the American Sphere The fact that Trump is a pathological liar is well established. What is most fascinating about his pathology is that this abnormal human behaviour is a carbon copy of the Jerusalemite path in general and Dershowitz's pathology in particular. As some of you may remember, Epstein's pal Chomsky referred to Dershowitz as a 'remarkable liar'. What is remarkable about Dershowitz is the shamelessness, the total lack of human dignity. Trump is contaminated with the exact same disease. It is that shamelessness while lying compulsively. What we see in Trump is total removal from the notion of truthfulness as we believe to know it. Of course, there is a possible philosophical interpretation of this similarity between these two horrid beings. What we see in Trump is the corrosive impact of Jerusalem. It is practically the tragic Western departure from the Athenian ethos. Let me brief you on the distinction between the Athenian and Jerusalemite in regards to the very specific perceptions of truth. The Greek word for truth, Aletheia (ἀλήθεια), literally means "the state of not being hidden." Truth in Ancient Greek is the aim at unconcealment or disclosure. This contrasts with the Hebrew (Judaic) concept of truth (Emet), which implies acceptance, adherence, and faithfulness. For the Greeks, truth was primarily about revealing what is. For the Jerusalemite, truth (Emet) means obedience. For the Greek, the act of searching for truth is defined by its seeking. In Jerusalem, truth is defined by Revelation: the act of obeying a given truth. Emet as such is defined by observance and practice (of the 613 Mitzvoth). While everything precious about the West originates in Athens—the truth-seeking and the method of seeking this truth (philosophy, science , art, ethics etc.), everything disastrous about the West and the way it is spiralling down has a lot to do with Jerusalem and its notion of Emet. For Emet is not subject to verification or substantiation. Political correctness, for instance, is, of course, an exemplary case of Emet: it is that thing which you are demanded to observe blindly, it is politics that cannot be questioned. The Holocaust and the laws that protect it constitute another kind of ‘Emet.’ Emet is defined by blind observance. The fantasy stories about 7 October: the ‘400 beheaded babies’, and ‘Hamas rape’ are classic Emet; they demand obedience, they deny verification. When Trump spreads astonishing lies that are literally counterfactual, he is practically following the Jerusalemite core tradition. Trump is, in this respect, the first American Jewish President. And unless removed soon, he may as well be the last one.

It wasn’t just one IDF soldier who smashed Jesus statue, his entire unit participated both actively and passively ! The IDF probe into the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident found out that in addition to the soldier who obliterated the statue and the soldier who photographed him, six other troops were “present at the scene and did not act to stop the incident or report it.” We are talking about the entire military unit. The meaning of it is both simple and obvious, we are dealing with a deranged collective, an identity united by goy hatred and total dismissal of otherness. This is what Choseness means in practice… The IDF’s inquiry determined that the soldiers’ conduct “completely deviated from IDF orders and values.” They obviously lie and the fact that 8 soldiers participated as perpetrators and witnesses prove that the hatred of everything not Jewish is the spiritual bond that drives the so called “most moral army in the world”. The IDF, an army credited with the worst documented genocide in world history, has only one issue with the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident- it is the fact that it was documented!

Netanyahu and the Myth of 'Jewish Values' Netanyahu. a genocidal monster, a fugitive war criminal, and a man subject to an international arrest warrant for crimes against humanity — is talking to us this morning about "Jewish tolerance" and "Jewish values." "As the Jewish state, Israel cherishes and upholds the Jewish values of tolerance and mutual respect between Jews and worshippers of all faiths," were the Prime Minister's exact words. Let me first clarify Netanyahu's misleading terms. In Judaism, ethics is replaced by litigation, and values are replaced by mitzvoth (commandments). As such, the notion of "Jewish value" is either problematic, vague or misleading. If value involves a conscious and voluntary affirmation of an ethical proposition, then in Judaism the moral action is prescribed by law. There is, therefore, a valid argument that "Jewish value" is actually an empty signifier. It doesn't refer to any real substance; rather, it operates as a forceful, abstract notion that some Jews toss in the air, knowing that no one (except me ) would dare challenge them. More specifically, when Netanyahu speaks of "Jewish tolerance," he is obviously and crudely falsifying. Judaism and tolerance are practically a contradiction in terms. Judaism adheres to the concept of Chosenness, and Chosenness is a form of organized intolerance. One could challenge this and insist that for Orthodox Jews, the meaning of being chosen is the duty to exhibit morally exemplary behavior - a "light to the nations." But even if that were the case - even if Jews were indeed a light to the nations - one can argue that they follow a divine order rather than voluntarily adhering to a ‘value system.’ This morning, the man who sent his army to reduce Gaza and its people to dust and flatten every house of worship along the way is telling us that "all religions flourish in our land, and we view members of all faiths as equals in building our society and region." Let me correct you, Mr. Netanyahu. This land is not yours, and it has never been yours. If there was at one stage a prospect of Jews living in Palestine in peace and harmony, you - more than anyone else in Jewish history - have made that an impossibility.

Can the USA survive Israel? All indicators point to a growing world fatigue with the Jewish State: its politics, its aggression, its genocidal zeal , its lies, its dirty economy, its global lobby-pretty much everything about it. Most significant, of course, is the well-documented American popular anti-Israel shift. The madman at the helm notices it. He has gathered that, at least within his base, an act of rebellion against his Tel Aviv masters might buy him some time, it may even reinstate some of his lost credibility. I have been telling you all along that Iran’s primary objective was not destroying Israel but weakening the USA first: dismantling its regional power, separating the American colony from its Jewish (mother) State. If I am reading the picture correctly, this is what we see before our eyes. The Ginger Caligula grasps that for America to have a tomorrow, and for him to survive somehow, the USA must cut its losses. It will remove itself from the Middle East and rebel (or even just pretend to rebel) against Jerusalem. The open question is whether the masters: both the ones in Zion and their caretakers in the USA, i.e., the lobby, the financiers, the media, the compromised political class-will let the Ginger Caligula off the hook. These people have a lot of leverage. They have used it effectively all along. They have no good reason to believe that Trump can so easily grow a spine. On the face of it, the future of America depends on Trump’s ability to sustain the personal damage inflicted upon him by this collective. In light of the above, the unstable, constant zigzagging performed by the miserable man at the top should not necessarily be read as evidence of the man being unhinged or mentally unstable. The so called ‘leader of the world’s superpower’ is being blackmailed by the most powerful and sinister gang the world has ever known. History teaches us that not one empire in the past survived that specific type of attack on its corridors of power. Is there any reason to believe that the USA may prevail against all odds?

After three and a half years of wars, a genocide, pushing the world into a global conflict Netanyahu is still the most popular Israeli PM candidate according to Yesterday’s N12 poll (with 25 MKs out of 120). Following Netanyahu is Naftali Bennett, a clinical genocidal character with 20 predicted MKs. In Israel there are only two left parties. They are both Arabs with 10 MKs together which mounts to less than 10% of the knesset. 10 MKs are centrist (Yair Golan) and the rest (100 out of 120) are right wing, hardcore right and religious fundamentalist. The meaning of it is that Netanyahu is not the ‘disease’, he is the true face of the Jewish state. Netanyahu is merely a symptom.

Were the Iranian willing to give away their enriched uranium? I came across an interesting theory this morning. Iran’s 400 kg of enriched uranium weren’t intended as source material for ten or more potential “bombs.” They were a bargaining tool. The Iranians thought, “We give away the enriched uranium, and in return you Americans remove the sanctions completely.” But it didn’t work out. You ask why? I can think of two possibilities: 1. American negotiation is dominated as well as driven by Israeli interests. Netanyahu defines the objectives; Witkoff and Kushner are the caretakers. The Jewish worldview, as we’ve discussed many times, is most often affected by Pre-TSD (pre-traumatic stress disorder). As opposed to Post-TSD, which is defined as a behavioral pattern triggered by a traumatic event in the past, in the case of PRE-TSD, it is a imaginary fantasy event in the future that triggers the trauma in the present. Jews are often tormented by a future fantasy of destruction, and it is that ‘trauma’ that shapes their present behavior into a self-destructive path. Why Jews developed such a peculiar tendency is, in itself, an interesting question. Is it because the God whom they invented and worship is itself a genocidal character (the destruction of Sodom, the Ten Plagues of Egypt, Deuteronomy’s God calling for the destruction of the indigenous, etc.)? Is it because of their suicidal/genocidal biblical heroes such as Samson? It may have something to do with their recent cultural heroes who initiated/invented/devised WMDs and nuclear warfare (Haber, Einstein, Szilard, Oppenheimer, etc.). Is it their Jewish state that introduced nuclear weapons to the Middle East (Shimon Peres—Dimona)? The Jewish negotiating team couldn’t grasp, let alone consider the Iranians’ kind offer because they projected their own genocidal symptoms onto their Iranian counterparts. 2. There is also a counter-explanation possible. It suggests accepting that Kushner, Witkoff, and Netanyahu actually understood the Iranian offer very well. They grasped that Iran is not interested in possessing nukes. Israel, as such, wasn’t interested in removing the enriched uranium; it just wanted to destroy Iran as part of Israel’s plan for greater domination in the region.

I broke my silence, first interview after 5 years of media silence. Friends , as you know I stopped giving interviews, I retired from being a public persona in 2020. I was asked so many time to comment but refused. However this guy Syed M. Abbas intrigued me. I liked his posts and comments. I accepted his invitation. Many clever people talk about geopolitics, others talk about military aspects. I may be the only one who is willing to dissect the J thing. I see the Jewishness of the Jewish State at the core of the mess we are all in.. I hope you enjoy it … https://youtu.be/lrnildu2j4M?is=-fIxgmcPR8oF0Ro_