Philosophy Shelf

معرفی رسوب رسوب کارگاهی‌ای برای شکل‌گیری گفت‌وگوها و پروژه‌های مستقل است؛ جایی که هر فصل حول یک مسئله، ماده یا پرسش مشخص شکل می‌گیرد. در دل وضعیتی در هنر معاصر ایران که کمبود رخدادهای مستقل هنری و تحقیق‌محور چشم‌گیر است، رسوب شرایطی را بوجود می‌آورد که در آن هر دانشجو با دسترسی به داده‌های جدید و بستر آموزشی متفاوت به مسیر تحقیقاتی خود ادامه دهد. هدف، ارائه‌ی یک پاسخ نهایی نیست، بلکه ایجاد شرایطی است که در آن یک ایده بتواند گسترش پیدا کند، مورد پرسش قرار گیرد و به پروژه‌های بدیع تبدیل شود. هر دانشجو با یک مسئله یا پروژه‌ی اولیه وارد برنامه می‌شود و در طول فصل، آن را از خلال مطالعه، گفت‌وگو، ارائه و نقد زیر نظر هدایت کنندگان گسترش می‌دهد. نخستین فصل رسوب با دو برنامه‌ی مستقل و موازی و در ۹ جلسه آغاز می‌شود: "رسالاتی در باب شورش ارضیه" هدایت برنامه: عرفان غیاثی و راه استودیو 🔙مهمانان رسالاتی در باب شورش ارضیه پاملا کریمی- تاریخ نگار هنر و استاد معماری در دانشگاه کرنل رضا نگارستانی- فیلسوف و نویسنده محمدهادی فروزش‌نیا- مترجم فلسفه و ادبیات رها خادمی- پژوهشگر هنر و فرهنگ دیداری ایران مریم کتان و شاهین پیمانی - هنرمند چند رسانه‌ای محمد غزالی- عکاس _____________________________________________ "رتوش" هدایت برنامه: محمد غزالی و راه استودیو 🔙مهمانان رتوش رضا حائری-فیلم ساز کاوه اقدامی-فلاح نگار باقری-روزنامه نگار بابک کبود-نقاش کوروش محمدی-کارگردان و طراح حرکت عرفان غیاثی-هنرمند و کیوریتور مستقل ثمر صارمی-معمار _____________________________ 🔹نحوه‌ی درخواست برای حضور برای دریافت توضیحات کامل درباره‌ی شرایط حضور و مدارک موردنیاز، ابتدا به نشانی زیر ایمیل بزنید: info@raah.studio و یا با صفحه اینستاگرام این رخداد تماس بگیرید: 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/rosoob.research/ 📅 آخرین مهلت تکمیل و ارسال مدارک: ۲ شهریور ۱۴۰۵

#political_philosophy

@reading_sociology_book

Reflections on the Revolution in France Edmund Burke @reading_sociology_book

#Conspiracy #Manifesto #Anonymous 👤 ⬛️ Conspiracist Manifesto 📎 https://t.me/necronomos

What if capitalism and its social machine were the outcome of a conspiratorial strategy? What if capitalism and its social machine were the outcome of a conspiratorial strategy? This anonymous book considers evidence that they must be that. Further, it argues in favor of passionate counter-conspiracies as the logical form of revolt in our time, when our very souls are said to be at stake.

Dear friends, If you're interested in interdisciplinary research, philosophy, critical theory, contemporary art, architecture, AI, the humanities, and experimental forms of knowledge production, applications are now open for “The New Centre for Research & Practice’s” “Fall/Winter 2026–27” programs. Applications for “scholarships” are open from “July 16 to August 25” (11:59 PM ET). Over the past few years, I have had the pleasure of attending and collaborating with The New Centre, and I consider it one of the most important independent platforms for online research, critical dialogue, and learning across philosophy, art, and theory. Bringing together artists, researchers, and thinkers from around the world, it offers an exceptional intellectual community, high-quality seminars, and an extensive archive of lectures and discussions. This season features a broad range of seminars, workshops, and roundtables, with #Reza_Negarestani serving as Dean of Academic Affairs alongside an expanded programming team covering critical philosophy, transdisciplinary studies, information architecture, intelligence design, and more. Apply here: https://thenewcentre.org/programs/admissions/apply-now/ Explore the offerings: • Programs: https://thenewcentre.org/programs • Seminars: https://thenewcentre.org/seminars • Workshops: https://thenewcentre.org/workshops • Roundtables: https://thenewcentre.org/roundtables If you know someone who would benefit from this opportunity, please consider sharing this call with them. رئالیسم تاریک

#Memes #Philosophy #Network_Cultures 👤 Enzo Aït Kaci, Gabrielle K. Aguilar, Hugo Almeida & Adalberto Fernandes, Ruba Al-Sweel, Morgane Billuart, Will Boase, Victor Chagas, Ray Dolitsay & Jasmin Leech, Gustavo Gómez-Mejía & Rosana Ardila, Seong-Young Her, Alexis E. Hunter & Tiera Tanksley, Manuel Hunziker, Zas Iehulee, Alia Leonardi & Alina Lupu, Charlotte Marie, Tyler Patterson, Elena Pilipets & Marloes Geboers, Sophie Publig, Gabriele de Seta, @simulacra_and_stimultions, Ivana Emily Škoro & Marijn Bril, Socrates Stamatatos, Eero Talo, Aidan Walker, Phil Wilkinson and Liam Voice. ⬛️ CRITICAL MEME READER III: BREAKING THE MEME 📎 https://t.me/necronomos

CRITICAL MEME READER III: BREAKING THE MEME Edited by Chloë Arkenbout and İdil Galip  When you want to say something about memes, it is impossible to escape having to situate them. What usually happens is that meme makers and thinkers fall back on two definitions: Dawkins (1976), Shifman (2014). How can memes be defined beyond their work in a way that is better suited to our current time? Building on this work – yes of course – but in a way that leaves space for the meme to breathe. Honoring its transgressive everchanging nature, instead of limiting it into a static framework it never chose to be in in the first place. For meme studies to truly theoretically evolve as a field, the meme needs many expanded definitions. The goal of Critical Meme Reader III is to break its definition open with different visions, and to keep it open –  letting the meme choose for itself what it wants to stay, be and become.

#Kierkegaard #Irony #Socrates 👤 Søren Kierkegaard ⬛️ The Concept of Irony: with Continual Reference to Socrates 📎 https://t.me/necronomos

A work that “not only treats of irony but is irony,” wrote a contemporary reviewer of The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates. Presented here with Kierkegaard’s notes of the celebrated Berlin lectures on “positive philosophy” by F.W.J. Schelling, the book is a seedbed of Kierkegaard’s subsequent work, both stylistically and thematically. Part One concentrates on Socrates, the master ironist, as interpreted by Xenophon, Plato, and Aristophanes, with a word on Hegel and Hegelian categories. Part Two is a more synoptic discussion of the concept of irony in Kierkegaard’s categories, with examples from other philosophers and with particular attention given to A. W. Schlegel’s novel Lucinde as an epitome of romantic irony. The Concept of Irony and the Notes of Schelling’s Berlin Lectures belong to the momentous year 1841, which included not only the completion of Kierkegaard’s university work and his sojourn in Berlin, but also the end of his engagement to Regine Olsen and the initial writing of Either/Or

https://thephilosophersmeme.com/articles/postnaturalism/ #Young_Her #postnaturalism

#Geroulanos #French_Philosophy #antihumanism 👤 Stefanos Geroulanos ⬛️ An Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought 📎 https://t.me/necronomos

French philosophy changed dramatically in the second quarter of the twentieth century. In the wake of World War I and, later, the Nazi and Soviet disasters, major philosophers such as Kojève, Levinas, Heidegger, Koyré, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Hyppolite argued that man could no longer fill the void left by the "death of God" without also calling up the worst in human history and denigrating the dignity of the human subject. In response, they contributed to a new belief that man should no longer be viewed as the basis for existence, thought, and ethics; rather, human nature became dependent on other concepts and structures, including Being, language, thought, and culture. This argument, which was to be paramount for existentialism and structuralism, came to dominate postwar thought. This intellectual history of these developments argues that at their heart lay a new atheism that rejected humanism as insufficient and ultimately violent.

#political_science

@reading_sociology_book