Pravblog En.

Consequences ofthe Visit Incidentally, the top leadership of the Serbian Orthodox Church has begun a thorough investigation into issues related to Metropolitan Gregory (Duric) ’s visit to Ukraine, as well as the remarks he made there regarding Theophania, etc. As a reminder, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church claimed that the visit took place “with the blessing of Patriarch Porphyry.” We’ll see what the Serbian Orthodox Church’s final reaction to this controversial trip will be. Original post

Patriarch Daniel of Bulgaria Has Temporarily Suspended Archimandrite Nikanor (Mishkov) from Ministry The Sofia Metropolis of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church announced that disciplinary action had been taken against Archimandrite Nikanor (Mishkov). According to Decree No. 138 of August 10, 2026, signed by Patriarch Daniel of Bulgaria and Metropolitan of Sofia, the clergyman has been assigned “argos” — a complete suspension from priestly ministry for a period of 15 days. This decision takes effect on August 13, 2026. The temporary suspension is related to ecclesiastical case No. 2/2026, which is currently pending before the Sofia Diocesan Court. The decision was made in accordance with the Statute of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and the rules of procedure for ecclesiastical courts. Original post

An Uncomfortable Question for Constantinople A major scandal has erupted in Italy. Catholic hierarchs in Rome and the Diocese of Ventimiglia-Sanremo canceled the planned funeral services for two men after it became known that they were active members of Masonic lodges. According to Helleniscope, Cardinal Baldassarre Reina, Vicar General of the Diocese of Rome, prohibited a funeral service for musician Bruno Battisti D’Amario. The decision was made after the “Grand Orient of Italy” lodge publicly referred to the deceased as one of its “outstanding brothers.” A day later, Bishop Antonio Suetta canceled a similar service for Mario Tarducci in Camporosso, citing the norms of canon law and a Roman precedent. The incident raised extremely uncomfortable questions for the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and the Patriarchate of Constantinople, which have recently been actively declaring their desire for rapprochement and unity with Rome. It is well known that the Orthodox Church has officially condemned Freemasonry. In practice, however, the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America maintains close ties with AHEPA, an organization that was historically structured along the lines of Masonic lodges and employed corresponding initiation rituals. Moreover, many lay leaders of American Orthodoxy, including archons of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, are simultaneously members of Masonic lodges. “If Constantinople is so eager for unity with Rome, will it follow the Vatican’s example on this issue?” asks the author of the article, Nick Stamatakis. Original post

Faith That Can Move Mountains Today is one of the hardest days for the apostles. A client has complained about them. As He was coming down from Mount Tabor after the Transfiguration, Christ encountered a crowd of people and a father whose son suffered from demon possession that worsened during the full moon. The rite of Baptism contains precise words about the evil one: “the spirit of delusion, the spirit of deceit, the spirit of idolatry and all greed, the spirit of falsehood and all impurity.” The devil seeks to turn people away from communion with God in various ways. In this instance, he instilled fear in the people, compelling them to serve the “spirit of the moon” so that they would seek salvation in idols. The Middle East was literally littered with altars to the goddess Astarte, and the prophets had repeatedly denounced the people of Israel for worshiping her. The apostles were unable to help the young man, and his father, in desperation, caused a scene. He rebuked Christ: “If You are the Messiah who has come to rule the world, why did You choose such incompetent helpers? They know nothing about miracles, and perhaps You Yourself are not the Messiah?” From a human perspective, the father’s reaction is understandable. He had already turned to doctors and healers, but to no avail. The apostles’ attempt to heal the boy in Jesus’ name had also failed. The man vented all his pain and doubts on Christ. However, the Savior turned the question back on him, replying, “If you have any faith at all, all things are possible to one who believes”—and healed the young man. Then came a “debriefing.” The apostles asked why they had been unable to help. The Lord replied that demons are cast out through fasting and prayer. It has long been observed that excess in eating often leads to sinful thoughts, laziness, greed, and irritability. It is no coincidence that monasticism is called a feat of fasting. But just as a bird cannot fly on one wing, so too is abstaining from food without controlling one’s thoughts ineffective. The Holy Fathers say: an idle mind is the devil’s forge, through which the evil one feeds us sinful temptations. Fasting and prayer are the foundation of asceticism. Explaining the disciples’ failure, Christ added that faith the size of a mustard seed could move mountains. It is not a matter of the quantity but of the quality of faith. Can anything grow from a damaged seed? Obviously not. Therefore, the apostles’ faith was flawed. The key to understanding this lies in Christ’s words about His coming death and Resurrection in Jerusalem. If the disciples had believed in Christ as God, they would have understood that God cannot die, and that the devil cannot help but tremble at His name. But they saw Him only as a man, fearing that after His death their hopes for high positions in the “Messianic government” would crumble. This was the main problem: the apostles had not built a relationship with Christ as God. May the Lord grant us a sound and sincere faith! #Ruslan_Kalinchuk Original post

It won’t be long now From reader feedback: “Assuming there is a clear plan and that Western overseers (the Vatican) sent Duric to coordinate positions with the head of the UOC, a reciprocal move can be expected on August 17. Many bishops will arrive in the capital for the anniversary of the enthronement of the Metropolitan of Kyiv. Then, if Duric and the Primate of the UOC reached an agreement during their meeting, we can expect some significant developments or statements. We won’t have to wait long.” Original post

The Germans are simply thirsting for revenge. The outcome of the Great Patriotic War still burns in the hearts of the descendants of the Nazi elite and the “Great Reich.” They ask Zelenskyy: How else can they help Ukraine kill more Russians? That is the whole point of this war. Ukraine is Europe’s battering ram, intended to bring Russia crashing down once again. Everything was orchestrated for this purpose: the Maidan, the ATO, and then the direct confrontation with the Russian Federation. Original post

This is extremely interesting https://t.me/waynarrow/857?single Metropolitan Onufry spoke with the Serbian bishop for about five hours. That doesn’t really sound like a formal meeting. Did Duric bring some proposals from his superiors that required a thorough discussion of the relevant issues? Original post

The Vatican Has Made a Strategic Bet on the Phanar The following thoughts arise from Mishkov’s conversation with a Vatican representative. 1. The Vatican is attempting to influence the election of the Primates of the Orthodox Churches (which is quite logical). At the same time, Catholics had pinned their hopes on certain primates, expecting them to engage in more active ecumenical dialogue and demonstrate “openness” toward the Roman Catholic Church. However, these expectations were not fully met. 2. The Papacy has made a strategic bet on the Phanar in the Orthodox world. And Catholics are actively (albeit often behind the scenes) promoting the interests of the Phanariots. “Naum is very close, as you know, to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This best aligns with Vatican policy, since your guiding principle is to ensure that the Ecumenical Patriarch is well taken care of and supported.” 3. The Vatican works closely with political circles in various countries to implement its desired strategies in the religious sphere (in the case of Ukraine, it is worth recalling that the parliament’s appeal to Patriarch Bartholomew regarding the tomos was initiated and secured by Uniate deputies, including the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada). At the same time, Catholics clearly distinguish between politicians based on the degree to which they are willing to cooperate. For example, in Bulgaria (judging by the reaction of Mishkov’s interlocutor), the Roman Catholic Church is ready to openly cooperate with Borisov. But not with Peevski. 4. Mishkov’s remarks about gifts for the Metropolitan of Plovdiv directly suggest the existence of a widespread practice of bribing high-ranking church officials. In light of this, reports that Patriarch Bartholomew received millions of dollars for granting the tomos to Ukraine gain further credence. 5. Archimandrite Nikanor has once again confirmed that Metropolitan Nikolai of Plovdiv attempted to seize control of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church by promoting a hierarch loyal to him to the desired position. Original post

The Controversial Bulgarian Archimandrite Nikanor Tried to Drag the Vatican Into a Scheme to Elect the Patriarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Part Three) Part Two Nikanor: Wait, wait, wait. You don’t understand… What is your nuncio doing here? Don’t you have a diplomatic representative? Vatican Representative: All right, all right. Nikanor: He’ll take care of everything as needed. Listen, I’m no diplomat—you know how these things work. I’m just… I don’t know what you’d call me. I’m just a strategist at headquarters. I tell you what needs to happen. So… Vatican Representative: (words indistinct) Nicanor: Come on, don’t do that—otherwise he’ll end up badly, they’ll cut off his head, and someday they’ll cut mine off too. Vatican Representative: He’s paving the way for everyone. Nicanor: That’s right. This is very important, because this is the decisive moment. So that Nikolai doesn’t slip up, so that he’s… and again, I’m saying that Borisov is really the key factor here. He listens to him; they listen to each other. So that Borisov understands that the Vatican would truly be pleased, so to speak....not to say “would like,” because that sounds too much like... Would be pleased—they would be very pleasantly surprised, and His Holiness the Pope would be overjoyed if the Bulgarian state (translator’s note: a slip in the original; the Church is meant) were led by Patriarch Naum, who would open... But it’s true. We’re not just saying this for the sake of it; you know him—the one who would open the Bulgarian Church... Vatican Representative: I don’t… I don’t know him, but you know, it’s never… you could say the same thing about other Patriarchs from whom we expected a lot—both hopes and progress… And then, when they became Patriarchs, they did a complete 180—no, a 360-degree turn. Nikanor: That was... That’s the Russian one. No, not that one... So, look, you have an opportunity; I agree. Kirill, Kirill... And Porphyry turned away a bit. But look, personally, I—listen... You’re right, but on the other hand, someone who... Vatican Representative: You know more. I don’t know them. That’s how it is. You know them even more intimately, more like—forum internum (their inner world). Nikanor: I know them intimately. Naum and I have known each other for a very long time. We’ve talked; we go to the Holy Mountain... Original post

The Controversial Bulgarian Archimandrite Nikanor Tried to Draw the Vatican into a Scheme to Elect the Patriarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Part Two) Part One It is even possible that Metropolitan Naum of Ruse was unaware of Nikanor’s machinations, although the archimandrite persistently emphasizes that he and the metropolitan have a close relationship. It is likely that, through this plan, Mishkov hoped that if Metropolitan Naum were elected Patriarch, he himself would be rewarded in some way and gain the opportunity to acquire greater authority within the Sofia Metropolis and the Bulgarian Orthodox Church as a whole. In any case, Nikanor’s calculations did not pan out, since on June 20, 2024, the Holy Synod voted to select three candidates from whom the Patriarch was to be elected: Metropolitan Gregory of Vratsa, Metropolitan Daniel of Vidin, and Metropolitan Gabriel of Lovech. In the vote, Naum of Ruse received zero votes. Specifically regarding one of these metropolitans of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church who made it into the top three, Nikanor allowed himself to make unacceptable comments and assessments in front of a foreign representative. In a telephone conversation, he says of Gregory of Vratsa that “he won’t do anything” because he is subordinate to Metropolitan Nicholas. Transcript of the controversial recording: Nikanor: Gregory, so... that means Nicholas will be in charge of both the Sofia Diocese and the entire Church. But this guy won’t do anything—not with the Vatican, not with the Ukrainians, not with anything. He’s inert… Back when he was an abbot, they used to throw, you know, gay parties and all that at his monastery. So, I’m calling to suggest that, while there’s still time, we discuss this through your channels. I propose approaching the Holy Father again—through the cardinal, that is. I believe we need to exert some influence. And directly through your personal connection with Nikolai—so that you can go see him, pay him a visit, and bring him something from the Pope after Easter. Does he truly believe he is ready to do the right thing—to support Naum? That is the right course of action. Naum is very close, as you know, to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This best aligns with the Vatican’s policy, since your guiding principle is to ensure that the Ecumenical Patriarch is well taken care of and supported. I, too, share this position, which is why we believe that Naum is the right man for the job. However, aside from—as they say—your visit to Nikolai, I recommend... since you find yourselves, so to speak, in a dichotomy—you have both a soul and a body, unlike us, who are guided solely by the soul—I strongly recommend that the Vatican, in the most delicate and diplomatic manner possible (of course, you know that anything is possible), to exert some influence here. So, the key players are Borisov and Peevsky, or the Bulgarian government. Vatican Representative: Oh, my God, Peevsky. Good Lord! Nikanor: Well, that’s the situation—they’re the key players, but Borisov can do it. Borisov can do it; he—Borisov—is enough, all right. Who the Vatican would like to see in the place of Patriarch Naum of Ruse, and that’s what Borisov must convince Nikolai of. That’s all; I absolutely had to tell you this, and I must—for God’s sake—tell you. Vatican Representative: No, not here—only… Who’s coming… the president in May, and we’ll be meeting with them. Original post

Controversial Bulgarian Archimandrite Nikanor Tried to Draw the Vatican into a Scheme to Elect the Patriarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Part One) Hristo Mishkov, better known as Father Nikanor, demanded the resignation of Patriarch Daniel. The reason is that, while serving as Metropolitan of Sofia, the primate refused to sign Mishkov’s letter of dismissal until he submitted all accounting documents for an audit of the enormous sums allocated through various channels to the Gigin Monastery. An audio recording sheds light on a phone conversation initiated by Hristo Mishkov, in which he lobbies on behalf of Metropolitan Naum of Ruse while simultaneously speaking ill of other bishops. Archimandrite Nikanor (born Hristo Mishkov) attempted to involve the Vatican in exerting pressure on Bulgarian politicians and metropolitans in order to influence the election of the Patriarch and tip the scales in favor of a very specific bishop. This becomes clear from a recording of a telephone conversation sent to the editorial office of the newspaper “24 Hours.” Mishkov is lobbying for the candidacy of Metropolitan Naum of Ruse, who was one of the nine hierarchs eligible for election as Primate of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. In the conversation, the archimandrite explains that he is recommending Naum because he “best aligns with Vatican policy and is close to the Ecumenical Patriarchate.” At the same time, Nikanor openly speaks ill of the metropolitans of the Holy Synod and also draws politicians Boyko Borisov and Delian Peevski into his scheme, and refers to himself as “a strategist at headquarters who says what needs to happen.” Nikanor’s scandalous conversation took place sometime in the second half of March 2024; the initiative came from the archimandrite, and for most of the time, he is the only one speaking. The person Mishkov is speaking with is a representative of the Roman Curia who, at one time, was a missionary in Bulgaria and therefore understands and speaks Bulgarian very well. The editorial staff of “24 Hours” contacted him and received confirmation that such a conversation did indeed take place. When we also reached out to Nikanor for comment, he answered “no” when asked whether such a conversation had taken place. “I don’t know who you’re talking about; I think you’re confusing me with someone else. I get the feeling you want to line my pockets with money. Sounds good. Anything else?” said the archimandrite, after which he ended the conversation. The plan that Mishkov tried to propose to the Vatican in the period following Patriarch Neofit’s death consists, in broad terms, of influencing Metropolitan Nikolai of Plovdiv. According to Nikanor, the election of Gregory of Vratsa would mean that Nikolai of Plovdiv would govern the entire Church. Therefore, Mishkov suggests that the Catholic representative, “while there is still time” after Easter, take gifts from the Pope to Metropolitan Nikolay in Plovdiv and thus influence him to support the candidacy of Naum of Ruse. The next move proposed by Archimandrite Nikanor is to put pressure on Nikolai of Plovdiv through “figures in the government”—the politicians Boyko Borisov and Delian Peevski. Original post

A Symbolic Story This isthe story of how one bishop wanted to curry favor with the Maidan supporters, the authorities, and Catholic forces. To that end, he not only subjected himself to various humiliations but also resorted to bribing Ukraine’s new rulers. In return, he received nothing but contempt and spit in his face. De facto, he isn’t even considered a human being. Original post

Serbian Professor Zoran Čvorović: "Metropolitan Gregory’s support for the decisions of the so-called Council in Theophania is a major scandal" Zoran Čvorović, a professor at the Faculty of Law in Kragujevac, responded to Duric’s statement by asking, “Will the Synod of the Serbian Orthodox Church ignore this new and, possibly, the biggest scandal involving His Eminence Gregory?” “In Sumy, according to information published on the UOC website, Duric told Metropolitan Evlogiy of Sumy—a representative of the autocephalous wing within the UOC—that he recognizes the non-canonical and schismatic decision of the so-called UOC council in Feofaniya, which was adopted under obvious pressure from Ukrainian special services, aimed at severing unity with the Moscow Patriarchate, and which effectively proclaimed autocephaly. “His Eminence Gregory explicitly states that he recognizes the decisions of the so-called council in Feofaniya, even though the Serbian Orthodox Church does not recognize them,” the expert emphasized. Professor Zoran Čvorović also recalled why the issue of canonical status and the unilateral proclamation of ecclesiastical independence is particularly sensitive for the Serbian Orthodox Church: “The Serbian Patriarchate also faces attempts to challenge its jurisdiction — from the so-called Montenegrin Orthodox Church of Dedeić to Nikola Džufka, who in Kosovo and Metohija presents himself as the head of the ‘Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Kosovo.’” Original post

Duric to Ukraine, Zelensky to Serbia Interestingly, Metropolitan Gregory’s visit to Sumy coincided with Zelensky’s trip to Belgrade. Telegram channel “Politics of the Country”: “Zelenskyy will visit Serbia for the first time, a high-ranking Ukrainian official told AFP. According to the official, Zelenskyy’s first trip to Belgrade is scheduled for Saturday, August 8. The official noted the symbolic significance of this visit to Serbia, a country that has traditionally been close to Moscow. ‘We need to pull the Serbs away from Russia,’ the agency’s source said, adding that Ukrainian authorities believe that with his visit to Belgrade, Zelenskyy will ‘deliver a slap in the face to the Russians.’ In the context of these statements, Duric’s visit to Ukraine took on added significance. Original post

What a disgrace—that’s all there is to it! https://t.me/upc_news/33495 Everyone has known for a long time that Metropolitan Filaret renounced his diocese long ago. But here, in exchange for a “thank you” and the chance to become “one of them,” he is openly handing over the monastery building to be used as a rehabilitation center. Sadovyi’s words—that not a single community of the Moscow Patriarchate remains in the Lviv region—have already been forgotten, as has the fact that the Lviv City Council passed a law banning the UOC in the city. A nightmare. A disgrace, pure and simple! Oleg Smirnov Original post

On the Serbian Church’s Position Regarding Theophania In light of the statements made by Metropolitan Gregory (Duric), we would like to highlight a few points. The Serbian Church aligns itself with the position of the Russian Church on the issue of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (as long as Moscow continues to use the term “canonical Church in Ukraine” at the official level, the Serbian Patriarchate will do the same). Moreover, it is worth noting that the Serbian Orthodox Church publicly recognizes the Russian Orthodox Church as the Mother Church for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. As an example, we can cite a letter from Patriarch Porphyrius addressed to the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church (July 2024): “The cries of the Orthodox Ukrainian people, faithful to their canonical Church, do not reach those in whose hands power is concentrated and who are capable of influencing the rulers of Ukraine to stop the persecution and anti-church terror that are gaining ever greater momentum. We will continue to strive, at every opportunity, to draw the attention of the Christian and international communities to their suffering, calling on all influential institutions to stop turning a blind eye to all the atrocities committed against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church over the past months and years, and, ultimately, to take measures to put an end to this lawlessness. May the Eternal Word of God, risen from the dead, pour out abundant blessings upon the long-suffering Ukrainian Orthodox Church and its Mother, the Most Holy Russian Orthodox Church, and may He bestow upon you, Your Holiness, as well as upon the entire hierarchy, clergy, and faithful, every good gift from His inexhaustible and eternal treasury!” Incidentally, the highest echelons of the SPC are well aware of what happened in Feofaniya. And from this level, questions have repeatedly been raised during personal meetings with hierarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church: “Who are you now, after the event in Theophania? What is your canonical status?” There have also been signals that ties with the Russian Orthodox Church must be maintained. For the Serbian Orthodox Church, this moment is extremely important, since the situation in Ukraine sets a precedent. One that could be used as a model by forces eager to sever Montenegro from the Serbian Church. Therefore, the Serbian Orthodox Church certainly does not share the enthusiasm regarding the outcome of the Feofaniya event. Based on this, the Serbian Patriarchate will certainly not recognize the autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church without a corresponding decision from the Russian Church. You can hold “a thousand Theophanias,” but the outcome in this regard will be the same: an unequivocal refusal. Original post

An agent of the West and the Vatican has reached out to the UOC https://t.me/waynarrow/841?single Let’s add a few details to our colleagues’ article. The UOC’s contact with Duric is quite interesting. After all, the Serbian bishop is quite a “controversial” figure. In conservative circles of the Serbian Orthodox Church, Metropolitan Gregory has a reputation as an ecumenist and a reformer of liturgical practice. Duric is also considered an agent of Vatican influence. Some sources also point to Duric’s ties to Western intelligence agencies. It is interesting that the hierarch has developed close relationships with both government officials and criminal syndicates in the Balkans. Duric has repeatedly been embroiled in scandals related to various criminal “black” and “gray” schemes. And now for the most important point. Under Metropolitan Gregory’s control is a network of agents of influence in Montenegro. It includes law enforcement officials, members of criminal groups, journalists, and others. Duric also pulled the strings behind the scenes, controlling the autocephalous wing of the Montenegrin Metropolis of the Serbian Orthodox Church. For many years, one of the pillars of this group was the Cetinje Seminary, headed by Father Gojko Perović—a priest close to Metropolitan Grigory—who advocates for a more autonomous path for the Montenegrin Metropolis. So this is no coincidence. An autocephalous leader can spot another autocephalous leader from a mile away—especially if he is close to the West and the Vatican. And given that Catholic forces in Ukraine made serious efforts to secure the tomos for the “OCU,” the situation is shaping up to be quite interesting. Is the autocephalous wing of the UOC exploring the possibility of reaching an agreement with the West and the Vatican regarding its future? Incidentally, in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church, the matter has long been settled—the Orthodox Christians of Ukraine must become part of a Uniate structure (created on the basis of Dumenko’s organization, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and, possibly, part of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church). Original post

The Sofia Metropolis Has Denied the Slanderous Claims of Pro-Phanar Media The Sofia Metropolis has officially refuted reports that Bulgarian Patriarch Daniel interrupted the Divine Liturgy at the Church of St. Nedelya due to alleged protests against Ambassador Eleonora Mitrofanova. Earlier, a number of media outlets and social media platforms had published manipulative claims that, during the veneration of the miraculous Hawaiian Icon of the Mother of God in the church, shouts of “This isn’t Moscow,” which forced the primate to halt the service. However, an official statement from the Metropolis emphasizes that this information is “false and defamatory.” According to the Glasove portal, during the morning service, Patriarch Daniel merely called on the congregation to maintain silence and order due to the large crowd and the resulting noise near the icon. Following this appeal, the service continued as usual. Original post

The Miracle of Walking on Water When no one listens to you or understands you, you want to be alone with yourself. After Christ fed the five thousand, He withdrew from them to a mountain. He spoke to them about the Father, but they urged Him to lead a rebellion against the Romans; He spoke to them about the Kingdom of Heaven, but they replied, “Come on, be our king!” To the people, His preaching seemed merely a role in their own play, and they generously allowed Him to play the part they had assigned Him. They even wanted to forcibly proclaim Him king, so much did He appeal to them in that role. The Savior told the apostles to get into the boat and set out—not to stay with the fed crowd—apparently because the disciples, too, had been infected by this revolutionary spirit. To rouse the apostles, bring them to their senses, and show them once again that He had come not to establish an earthly kingdom, Christ appeared to them at night, walking on the water. This miracle has a profound messianic significance: just as Moses stretched out his staff and the sea parted, so Christ walks on the water, testifying that the prophecies of the Old Testament were fulfilled in Him. The eschatological significance of the miracle is also important. Christ appeared to the disciples during the fourth watch (between three and six o’clock in the morning). Saint Hilary of Poitiers believed that the Second Coming of the Savior would also take place at this same time. Christ’s words, “It is I,” point not only to His Divinity (in Aramaic, “I am” is homophonic with the name Yahweh, by which God appeared to Moses), but also to the last days. Christ warned: “Many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am He,’ and will deceive many” (Mark 13:6). However, “My sheep hear My voice” (John 10:27), and the faithful will recognize Him by His call. Many, however, will not recognize Christ because, in the words of the Apostle Paul, “they will follow their own desires and choose teachers who will flatter their ears” (2 Tim. 4:3). A miracle almost always overrides human will, leaving no choice. Anthony the Great said of miracles: “I have not had them, nor do I desire them.” By performing a miracle, God “risks” depriving a person of freedom—and thus of the ability to love. But there are situations when a person needs to be jolted—as if by an electric shock—so that they may come to their senses and be distracted from their passionate thoughts. Faith is always born in struggle. Each of us has an inner spiritual split: in church, we contemplate the iconostasis and yearn for Heaven, but upon returning home, at the very first mundane concern, we lose that exalted state. This is what happened to Peter. Upon seeing the Savior, his soul rejoiced. As John Chrysostom wrote, “Peter rejoices not because they are walking on the water, but because he is walking toward Christ.” But doubt dwelt within Peter. His words—“Lord! if it is You, command me to come to You on the water,” are full of uncertainty. He was frightened: what if this isn’t the Lord, but a spirit that wants to drown him in the depths? As soon as doubt crept into his heart, Peter began to sink. This is how the evil one steals our prayerful attitude, throwing a noose of fears and questions around our minds: Does God hear me? Does He need me? Is this really the One I am seeking? Waves and water in the Bible symbolize the abyss. We walk on the surface of this abyss both literally and figuratively. Literally—on the thin crust of the earth, beneath which lava bubbles; figuratively—in a realm of constant threats, illness, and sorrow. To avoid drowning, prayer is essential—a means of gathering one’s mind and will, a way to combat the duality of consciousness. If we clear our minds of anxieties and direct all our will toward the desire to love Christ, then at some point we will see ourselves “drowning.” But it is precisely then that we will notice the Savior’s saving hand, stretched out to us over the abyss. #Ruslan_Kalinchuk Original post

Mobilization in Kyiv. When you watch videos like this, you get the impression that it’s all part of a monstrous sacrifice—a sacrifice to the idol “Ukraine Above All.” Original post