Sweat Economy Plus

Most altcoins won’t survive the coming bear market. Brace for impact! I am not talking about red charts; entire ecosystems will collapse into irrelevance. Unprofitable projects with weak fundamentals and no real utility will vanish outright. 💀 SWEAT is no exception. It is on track to bleed down to a sub-$5M market cap, relegated to the ranks of forgotten micro-cap shitcoins. While it may technically survive the downturn, don’t expect a phoenix moment. At best, it will limp into the next cycle with minimal gains—if any. In this environment, survival alone isn’t enough. Only tokens with real value, strong communities, and long-term vision will matter. Everything else? Dead weight. The current SWEAT community is already showing signs of collapse. What remains is a group of exhausted holders, many of whom are sitting on severe losses after buying into the token. Morale is low, engagement is fading, and if the trend continues, the next wave of downturns will leave just a handful—maybe seven—active members in the core community. With no unique utility being built and no meaningful updates for over a year, the writing is on the wall 💩. At this point, your best move might be to short the token, uninstall the apps, and go touch grass. Because clinging to a sinking ship out of hope alone isn’t strategy—it’s denial.

A million-user wallet with $500 in trades—it’ll be comedy.

Interesting that this question came from you. What will be your answer ?

why not. Everyone complains about the price, but no one is willing to pay a higher price by sticking with the project.

Seriously, why are you still holding SWEAT? I am curious 🤔

🟢 Near Protocol has been struggling in the market for months now. When you look at the speed at which mega corporations and grassroots AI communities are already pushing boundaries; democratizing access and constantly improving models, it is hard to see how Near Protocol's pivot will stand out. By the time they bring something to market, the space might already be dominated by players moving ten times faster in Web2 and Web3. To be fair, we haven't seen the final product yet. It could surprise us. They are also cooking up chain abstraction, which, if executed properly, could give NEAR a unique position in the multichain user experience space. So the story isn't over. But here is where my doubts creep in. I have always questioned the NEAR Foundation's ability to market and position its product. Even when they build interesting tech, the communication is clumsy, the branding is weak, and the momentum never lasts. In a market where narrative is everything, that is a crippling flaw. ➡️ Don’t get me wrong: NEAR isn't going anywhere. The protocol has staying power, and it will continue to exist. But as for treating NEAR like a blue-chip play for this bull cycle? Personally, I am not betting on it.

😀 Sweat Hub This month, Sweat Economy rolled out SWEAT Hub, hyped as the “gateway to the biggest growth engine in consumer crypto,” boasting more than 2.5 million monthly active users. Big words, bold promises. But peel back the glossy pitch, and SWEAT Hub is nothing more than a storefront designed to sell your attention to endless advertisers. If it works (and it probably will), the Sweat Foundation pockets more ad revenue to keep the lights on. And what will you, the loyal user, get in return? The same empty “engagement” we’ve seen before: - More ads in your wallet - More unrewarding Learn & Earn campaigns - More Twitter Spaces that go nowhere, and - More raffles where you fight thousands of people for the chance to win… a crumb of bread. That’s the grand future of “the movement economy.” 🔘Let’s rewind for a moment. The saddest part? The Sweat Foundation promised a lot over the years. Exciting utilities, a strong ecosystem, and a new era of movement-powered crypto. But here we are, years later, and what’s the actual utility for the SWEAT token? Just one: staking. And even that is a cruel joke. The yield you earn is completely wiped out by the token’s disastrous market performance. The only practical reason people stake is to gain entry into raffles—raffles where you’re competing against hundreds of thousands of others for the chance to win a few gift cards or vouchers. That’s what the movement economy has been reduced to. 🔘The Multichain Wallet Fantasy Some of you are still holding out hope for the much-hyped multichain wallet. A wallet where you can supposedly use SWEAT tokens to pay transaction fees across chains. But let us be brutally honest: do you really believe people will ditch Phantom, Trust Wallet, or Metamask just because Sweat Wallet lets them pay fees in a single token (SWEAT)? Not a chance. Sweat Wallet is late to the game with no killer feature except “you can pay fees in our token.” 🔘Millions of Users, Zero On-Chain Value This brings us to the real issue: Sweat Economy and Near Protocol love to trumpet their millions of users. But these are hollow numbers. - Do they trade on DEXes? No. - Do they transact actively on-chain? No. - Do they provide real liquidity or value to Web3 ecosystems? Absolutely not. They don’t behave like crypto users at all. They are Web2 sign-ups who log steps, claim tiny rewards, and move on. That is why, even though Sweat Economy is one of the most populous dApps in crypto, it doesn’t even rank among the top 1000 projects on CoinGecko. That’s also why the Sweat Wallet, despite boasting millions of downloads, will probably crawl along with daily volumes smaller than a mid-tier NFT project. A million-user wallet with $500 in trades—it’ll be comedy. 🔘The Truth Is Simple Sweat Hub will be remembered as just another chapter in a long story of squandered potential. SWEAT has no meaningful utility, promises have been left unfulfilled, and that years of hype have produced little more than ads, raffles, and disappointment.

We’ve Completely Lost the Plot If you had invested $1,000 in SWEAT when it launched three years ago, that investment would now be worth just $25. 🙂 Let that sink in. This isn’t just a minor underperformance or bad luck due to “market conditions”, it’s a complete erosion of value, and no amount of spin from the Sweat Foundation can explain it away. Yet time and again, the team blames the market. As if Bitcoin and other altcoins haven't go through the same cycle. This is a product and leadership issue. ❗️ It Was Never About Price for Me I want to make something clear, I did not stop caring about this project because of its price collapse. SWEAT has always been a relatively poor performer on the charts since its inception. That alone never bothered me. I have seen worse altcoins turn around. What made me lose interest was the shift in energy, direction, and integrity from the team itself. 🔘A Sudden Change in Strategy At one point, Sweat Economy felt like a project with heart. A project with a mission to bring movement and crypto together in a way that was simple, rewarding, and forward-thinking. They had a roadmap that looked bold, a community that believed in the long-term, and a seemingly tireless commitment to innovating the “movement economy.” But then... something changed. - Important developments were quietly canceled or shelved without explanation. - Promised features never shipped. - The grand vision slowly gave way to lazy, low-effort monetization schemes. - Instead of building real Web3 tools, the team began plugging advertisements into every possible corner of the Sweat Wallet. 🔘 The Wallet Has Become an Ad-Farm Let’s call it what it is: the Sweat Wallet has become an ad hub. Video ads are now baked into every user engagement. Every tap, every reward, every action feels like it's just a vehicle to show you another video Ad. And what do you get in return? A few hundredths of a cent. 😐 Literally, $0.002. It's insulting, especially when this same ecosystem was once hyped as the beginning of a new era in health, movement, and Web3 economics. Now we are stuck with a bloated app that’s more focused on attention farming than meaningful rewards. And that’s the most tragic part: this isn't move-to-earn anymore. It’s been reduced to watch-ads-to-earn, and even that barely works. 🔘 A Crumbling Narrative What we are witnessing now is the breakdown of a once-compelling story. The messier the project becomes... The more fragmented the user experience... The worse the token performs... The more partners and users walk away... We have gone from a promising health-powered crypto revolution to a tired, ad-heavy app with no unique selling point and no edge in a competitive market. Worse still, there's a visible lack of innovation. Instead of building new features, exploring new token use cases, or fixing broken mechanics, the team seems content with patching up the old UI, renaming campaigns, and partnering with projects that barely make sense. 🔘 What Are We Even Doing Anymore? There’s no shame in pivoting if something’s not working. But you have to pivot with purpose. Sweat Economy, instead, has slowly drifted into irrelevance. Refusing to admit its mistakes, dodging feedback, and gaslighting the community into believing everything’s fine while the numbers tell a different story. There’s still a community here, still some belief in what this could have been. But if the current direction continues, that belief will fade completely, and all that will remain is a case study in how to lose long-term trust. 💔 Final Thoughts Projects die when their communities stop caring. And honestly? Many of us are almost there. If Sweat Economy is going to recover, it needs a radical return to vision, a serious product rethink, and full transparency from the Foundation. Not another seasonal campaign, unknown partners, or listing. Until then, I am just watching from a distance. Like many others, I am still holding; but I am not hoping. We’ve completely lost the plot 🤢.

Sweat Economy Plus pinned a photo

💀 Another one bites the dust! Apple’s watchOS 26 is set to introduce more personalized ways to stay active. One standout feature: Workout Buddy It bears a striking resemblance to Sweat Economy’s long-promised AI coach. The difference? Apple’s version will, of course, be more optimized, accurate, and seamlessly integrated within its ecosystem. Just like that, another Sweat Economy dream gets cannibalized by a bigger, faster-moving player. Phew.

🖼 A Fresh Coat of Paint, But the Same Cracks Beneath While I was "away," quite a few changes rolled out. Sweat Economy now has a new domain, a redesigned website, and a fresh whitepaper. Aesthetically, it’s a solid refresh—clean, modern, and encouraging in the sense that the team is clearly still passionate and pushing forward. But beneath the surface, nothing has fundamentally changed. The whitepaper is essentially a reworded, updated version of the original—still full of ambitious, utopian ideas. The roadmap? Similar to last year's. So, despite the shiny upgrades, the Movement Economy remains stuck. Same old challenges with implementation. Same market performance issues. Same growing frustration from the community. In many ways, I feel like I missed a lot—but also missed nothing at all. I keep finding myself comparing Sweat Economy to a carbon credits startup I have been working with. The concept is wholesome. Ambitious. A potential force for good. But every time we try to ground the idea in reality, there’s this sinking feeling of: “Maybe we’re deluding ourselves.” That’s how it feels here too.

If you're hunting for the next explosive crypto asset to buy at these generational lows with the hope of a phenomenal return this bull cycle, then let's be honest—SWEAT Economy probably shouldn’t be at the top your shortlist. But if you’re someone who’s building a portfolio of alternative long-term plays, Sweat Economy absolutely deserves a spot on that list. Because if there's one thing we've learned after all this—it’s that nothing can kill Sweat Economy. Not the brutal bear markets. Not the missed deadlines. Not the underwhelming products. Not the extreme FUD. Not even the moments when the community was clinging onto hope with just one hand. At this point, I’m convinced even a world war wouldn’t be enough to wipe it out. That’s why—although I haven’t bought any SWEAT in a long time—I have also never sold a single token. My NEAR wallet is basically a fossil at this point. Zero transactions in nearly two years. Just cobwebs and conviction. Of course, that’s my personal view. If your analysis, signals, and risk appetite point elsewhere, by all means—trade accordingly.

😎 NEW ALL TIME LOW

True that market now rewards narratives (a promise of future profits) more than delivery of results now. This is a step that every industry goes through. Internet in the 90s was littered with crazy projects and ideas with humangous valuations and this resulted in DotComBubble bursting in 2000. Projects that were building something of substance survived and prsopered. Many projects that dominate the world were born after the bubble - Google in 2003 and Facebook in 2007. The fact that we are in pre Infrastructure Bubble does not mean that the bubble burst is not coming. In fact, what we hear from the market is that many projects are desperate, many founders are giving up, many projects delay launches, etc. I share your frustration that $SWEAT is not pumping, but I know that we will be here 10 and 20 years down the line because we have stamina, patience and runway and we are building something with trillion dollar potential. Have a look at the path of NVIDIA and how long they have been flat or down - GOOD THINGS TAKE TIME, but we are here and we are listening and if you have thoughts and ideas on how we can deliver short-term results without jeopardising long-term success we will do it!

A good product is not enough! No matter how much project teams emphasize real-world utility, the crypto market largely judges projects based on their price potential. A project can have the most innovative and useful product, but if its market performance is weak, it will still be considered a failure by many investors. In this space, perception often outweighs practicality. Price action dictates reputation more than actual problem-solving does. Sweat Economy is stuck in a deep hole, and the reality is harsh—no matter how much work has gone into Sweatcoin, step verification, or other ecosystem developments, the easiest and most visible measure of success in crypto is price action. And it's always been terrible. 😇 You'd hope that investors would take the time to research, to understand the progress made, and to appreciate the long-term vision. But they won’t. Instead, they’ll check the chart, skim through social media sentiment, and if they’re feeling generous, glance at what’s been built so far. But in a sea of thousands of other promising altcoins, few will bother to dig deeper. This is an incredibly tough battle. The success factors that are out of The Sweat Foundation's control are often underrated.

AI agents are shaping up to be this cycle’s version of last cycle’s NFTs. Now, everyone is slapping a tiny LLM they picked for free from the internet onto a basic smart contract that fetches a crumb of data from an oracle and calling it an AI agent. In reality, it's just a smart contract with a fancy label. For a while, crypto will be driven by fantasy and deception. That’s the worst part of a bull cycle—projects scrambling to piece together a Frankenstein monster of buzzwords just to milk normies.

Solana is too good

The dip is still dipping 🤣🤣🤣

🟢 Lessons for NEAR Protocol and What It Can Do In response NEAR Protocol has a golden opportunity to learn from TON’s failures, capitalize on the growing frustration with its ecosystem, and position itself as the superior choice for onboarding and distribution. Here’s what NEAR should take away from this mess—and what it can do differently. 1. Prioritize Quality Over Hype & Avoid the Fast-Money Trap Hype-driven mini-games and memecoins aren't inherently bad, but when an ecosystem becomes dominated by Ponzi-like pay-to-earn schemes, trust is lost. TON's biggest issue is that it prioritized quick cash and inflated metrics over sustainable growth, burning users in the process. What NEAR should do: • Support genuinely innovative projects with long-term value, not just money grabs. • Discourage Ponzi models and pay-to-earn structures that extract value without creating any. • Demand transparency from projects to prevent misleading "get rich quick" narratives. 2. Build a Trustworthy Crypto Gaming Ecosystem TON and Telegram, whether intentionally or not, have enabled a cycle of onboarding, extracting money, and rugging users. This is not sustainable. If NEAR wants to thrive, it must establish a reputation as the safer alternative. How NEAR can stand out: • Implement minimum transparency and audit standards for projects receiving official support. • Introduce a verification badge system for legitimate projects to help users identify safe and fair games. 3. Protect Community Trust—Don't Exploit It Telegram and Pavel Durov leveraged their credibility to push dumb projects, leading users to assume they were legitimate. But after repeated scams, both are rapidly losing trust. NEAR should take the opposite approach. • Build a truly community-driven ecosystem, avoiding hype-driven influencer marketing. • Hold developers accountable—publicly call out bad actors and cut off ecosystem support. • Avoid “Founder Worship”—TON thrives on Durov’s cult-like status, but NEAR should distribute power and influence among real builders instead of a single figurehead. 4. Make Crypto Onboarding Safe & Sustainable TON's biggest strength—onboarding millions—has become its biggest weakness, as most users enter Web3 only to be scammed. If your ecosystem gives newcomers a negative experience, you've lost them for good. NEAR’s approach to fix this: • Ensure low-risk entry to Web3 gaming and DeFi to prevent immediate rug pulls. • Replace Ponzi-like reward models with genuine staking incentives and sustainable mechanics. • Maintain ethical advertising standards—don't let scams dominate your ecosystem. 🔥 The Opportunity for NEAR Telegram and TON's decentralization experiment is failing—TON is becoming an unchecked scam factory while Telegram turns into a corporate cash grab. The only thing keeping it afloat is its massive user base, but trust is eroding fast. This is NEAR's moment to step in as the “cleaner” alternative—a blockchain that offers the same seamless onboarding as TON but with integrity, transparency, and sustainable growth. If NEAR can build a better GameFi and DeFi experience while protecting users, it can dominate this space. The window of opportunity won’t stay open forever—NEAR just needs to act now.