Amnesty One To One - 10 reasons to NOT abolish the death penalty / 10 raisons pour NE PAS abolir la peine de mort

описание

By @WomenRightsTelegram @DefenceTelegram @GenRevolutionOfficial @FactsTelegramChannels - All scientific channels against @AmnestyPropaganda! @AmnestyShit @AmnestyFacts https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx @DeathPenaltyOneToOne

← к каналу @AmnestyOneToOne

подписчиков

Охват к подписчикам

320,0%

ERR

Реакции к просмотрам

0,00%

0 на 19 постов

Пересылки к просмотрам

0,02%

Постов в день

0,0

всего 20

Где отзываются чаще

доля реакций к просмотрам

21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1:1 pena de muerte / death penalty Part 7 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So again, AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE (= University of Oxford) ARE FAKE SCIENCE AND INFOS! where Carolyn is 1000x better than Amnesty BUT STILL YEARS AWAY FROM BEING PERFECT! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Not just them, even John Bessler and co. are BULLSHIT! https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia Please don't come here with BULLSHIT SCIENCE ABOUT HOMICIDES! since we already verified all such things previously! and we are even ready to verify other things if needed! https://t.me/AmnestyFake https://t.me/AmnestyFacts 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx This means even LESS BULLSHIT ABOUT RECIDIVISM! https://t.me/RecidivismFacts or considering some crimes less "worse" since you keep eyes closed about all what is happening BEFORE OR AFTER THE CRIME! https://t.me/SuicideRape https://t.me/BreivikTrauma https://t.me/EmpathyTelegram Related https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/361 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/304 etc. The difference between us and the other two? We share both sides, even if we support death penalty for SOME (not all) crimes! and we are not saying YOU NEED TO IMPLEMENT THAT PUNTO E BASTA! Because even implementing that, doesn't mean implementing that for all crimes or or or! Everyone can do what he wants BUT ONLY AFTER CONSIDERING ALL FACTS! not bullshit! and ALL POINT OF VIEWS! not just from a criminal point of view, forgetting guards, innocent killed, homeless, etc! Check all previous one to one: https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights 8. Acuerdos internacionales para la abolición de la pena de muerte YES EXACTLY 🇪🇺 EUROPE IS A GREAT MAFIA! https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyIgnorance/211 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/723 Not just related to death penalty! https://t.me/EuropeFacts Innocent https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/1780,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 El efecto de la abolición en los índices de delincuencia - The effect of abolition on crime rates En Canadá, por ejemplo, el índice de homicidios por 100.000 habitantes descendió del 3,09 en 1975, el nivel máximo alcanzado y correspondiente al año anterior a la abolición de la pena de muerte para el delito de asesinato, al 2,41 en 1980, y desde entonces ha descendido aún más. En 2002, 26 años después de la abolición de la pena capital, el índice de homicidios era del 1,85 por 100.000 habitantes, un 40 por ciento inferior al de 1975. In Canada, for example, the homicide rate per 100,000 inhabitants fell from 3.09 in 1975, the highest level reached and corresponding to the year before the abolition of the death penalty for the crime of murder, to 2.41 in 1980. , and has since fallen even further. In 2002, 26 years after the abolition of capital punishment, the homicide rate was 1.85 per 100,000 inhabitants, 40 percent lower than in 1975. Here we go! THIS IS BULLSHIT OF AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE! https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32 https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/92 https://t.me/CarolynHoyle/19 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 Backup https://perma.cc/GRS4-RZT4 https://perma.cc/K5H7-52NA https://perma.cc/J3F3-ZWNG 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx and WE DON'T SUPPORT SUCH BULLSHIT AT ALL! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/15 So again Carolyn Hoyle, you are not fully bad! BUT YOU ARE NOT PERFECT TOO! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle WE DON'T SUPPORT MAFIOUS RESEARCHER! Share all facts and share TRUE FACTS! not just half of the informations by posting Table 9.1 Australia: Murder and manslaughter, rate per 100,000 persons, 1993–2005 when THIS IS AFTER!!! LAST EXECUTION OR THE BAN! without showing WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE THAT OR DURING THAT! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 https://perma.cc/8QRH-3AR40,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX! Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into account when attempt- ing to control for those other factors that might affect both the homicide rate and the execution rate? EXACTLY!!! Factors that may affect the homicide rate, outside gun ownership, are difficult to measure because they are facets of the more general social climate and culture, such as migration, the effectiveness of informal social controls, the extent of alcohol abuse, the availability and price of illegal drugs, the degree of communal integration, and the extent to which there is a ‘sub-culture of violence’ or alternative modes of relieving frustrations other than violence ... etc. https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/392 At least Carolyn Hoyle has brain and cite such things! instead OF IGNORING LIKE AMNESTY! Reason why Carolyn Hoyle is 1000x better than Amnesty! BUT still not perfect! sharing all points or facts ... https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Yet, ‘None of the new deterrence studies consider the epidemics of drug use and related violence" 🤦‍♂️ .... What about cannabis??? https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2284 Let we remember positive correlation between cannabis and homicides, if we exclude poor US states ... Does this mean cannabis increase homicides? NOPE! It's just correlation! NOT A FACT! Like death penalty cannot be correlated in the same way! https://t.me/AmnestyFake/373 In summary: "... no es prudente aceptar la hipótesis de que la pena capital tenga un mayor poder disuasorio sobre los asesinatos que la amenaza y aplicación de la cadena perpetua, pena supuestamente inferior" IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THIS; THERE IS MUCH MORE BEHIND! and who wrote this book is saying such things too!0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BEING PRO OR CONTRA RELATED TO THE TOPIC DETERRENT! but don't come here with the bullshit "no death penalty = less homicides!" BECAUSE THIS IS BULLSHIT! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx and we said previously, Carolyn is not considering all point of views and sometimes is writing bullshit, but she is doing still a better job than Amnesty! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle For, as Dezhbakhsh and Shepherd recognize, executions also have costs: ‘these include the harm from the death penalty’s possibly discriminatory application and the risk of executing innocent people. Policy makers must weigh the benefits and costs to determine the optimal use of the death penalty’ Read such posts https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/377 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/355 What she is writing: First, there is the problem of sufficient data. First, the percentage of people sentenced to death in the United States who actually are executed is minute so the data will always seem insufficient!! Second...the executions that do occur are disproportionately centered in a few states—indeed, close to a majority in a single state—so the various effects of skewing hamper sound empirical inference-drawing. The inference drawn is that the fear of capital punishment rather than long imprisonment will not restrain those who are apt to commit murder, because murder usually arises from an explosion of temper or loss of control, from mental illness or defective personality, or from panic when faced with imminent capture. Why exactly JUST TALKING ABOUT MURDERS!!! IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT MURDERS! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 We find that the existing evidence for deterrence is surprisingly fragile ... See next post0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 "Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment" "Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execution under any circumstances) would demand proof that executions have a substantial marginal deterrent effect" NOPE! WE GIVE A SHIT TO DETERRENT! Is NOT HUGE important for serious criminals! RECIDIVISM IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT! https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43 and we know that with death penalty WE KILL RECIDIVISM 100%! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/270 https://t.me/RecidivismFacts https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance https://t.me/BreivikParole https://t.me/ParoleFacts Do we keep in prison people that maybe will not do the same crime again? Well THIS IS PART OF THE SAFETY! and we do that with a life sentence too! Human Rights and Safety of the population = high recidivism risk = high prison escape or whatever > Human Rights of Serious Criminals! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/387 doesn't matter if Breivik will or will not redo a terror attack! BREIVIK IS A SERIOUS RISK and many other criminals are even a serious risk! https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/768 even if there is the possibility he will never do that again! DOESN'T MATTER! POPULATION > SERIOUS CRIMINALS! FOREVER! Plus the real question is deterrent of which type of crime, with which reason????! Why always just talking about deterrent!! Like we do with climate change, talking about average and saying that a baby is polluting exactly like a rich person 🤦‍♂️! https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/67 This is NOT science and facts! This is just 💩! No matter what, Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! See next post0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos. Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterrent power against crime than other punishments Yes, BUT EVEN THE OPPOSITE!!!!! because this cannot be showed with science! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102 and don't forget that such things DEPENDS FROM A LOT OF FACTORS!!! https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363 to https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404 It's like saying "if we give condoms for free, there are no pregnant women anymore" which would be just BULLSHIT! Plus is NOT just about deterrent! https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/364 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/375 "The evidence reviewed in this chapter should lead any dispassionate analyst to conclude that it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment, as practised in the United States, deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment" Who wrote that? Carolyn Hoyle! a researcher BEING PART OF THIS MAFIA WRITING BULLSHIT! like we showed previously! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle but still 1000x better than Amnesty! Let we check what she is writing "the non-experimental research to which the study of the deterrent effects of capital punishment is necessarily limited will almost certainly be unable to meet those standards of proof" "The only scientifically and ethically acceptable conclusion from the complete body of existing social science literature on deterrence and the death penalty is that it is impossible to tell whether deterrent effects are strong or weak or whether they exist at all . . . " See next post0,00%
21 мар. 2024 г.без подписи0,00%