tgindex
DIGITAL ID Au | public channel

DIGITAL ID Au | public channel

Статистика

Digital ID, Social Credit Cybersafety AI, Cyber Safety Surveillance, Carbon Scores, Face Scan, QR . Admin support: @Rob_Digi https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au

Последний пост
13 авг.
Последнее чтение
15 авг.
Постов за неделю
25
Всего постов
54
Тип
открытый
Язык
und
Категория
Новости и СМИ (по похожим)
В каталоге с
13 авг.
Подписчики
3 683
+2 за 2 дн.
Сутки
−1
−0,03%
Неделя
 
Месяц
 
Просмотров на пост
161
40 постов
Вовлечённость
4,4%
к подписчикам
Постов в день
3,6
всего 54
Упоминаний
4
каналов
Охват размещения
оценка
1/24сутки в ленте
129
1/48двое суток
147
1/72трое суток
159

Оценка по просмотрам недавних постов: пост набирает почти всё за первые сутки.

Посты

  • . Very informative channel https://t.me/thehackernews .

  • This is what I am partway through building https://www.projectnomad.us/

  • Brazil Orders Discord Platform To Suspend Livestreaming Over Child Safety Brazil’s data protection authority ANPD ordered chat platform Discord to suspend livestreaming features, citing failures to protect children and teens from exposure to content promoting violence, self-harm and suicide. ANPD said Discord must prove compliance within three business days and faces potential fines of up to 50 million reais ($9.67 million) per violation. The platform can appeal the decision within 10 business days, with further appeal to ANPD’s board possible. ANPD issued the measure on Wednesday, suspending Discord’s “Go Live” livestreaming feature The suspension is set until Discord proves implementation of adequate protective measures for minors, the agency said in a statement ANPD said it found Discord lacks real-time access to livestream content, which prevents automated violation detection, and the platform relies on flawed systems and user reports The ANPD investigation began last Friday after an incident in which investigators say a 13-year-old girl was persuaded to take her life by others in the online group. Theo. Economy, Unalienable Rights & Ideas for an intelligent, mature audience. Intellectual, no emotionalism. We are committed to combatting Antisemitism and racism.

  • Meta Says It Closed 756,000 Australian Teen Accounts Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, announced Thursday that it has removed over 750,000 accounts suspected to belong to Australians under 16 since implementing a global ban on teen accounts. The company also pledged additional measures in response to possible regulatory action. The company reported deactivating 462,000 suspected Instagram accounts and 294,000 suspected Facebook accounts from just before the Australian social media ban in December through June. This represents an increase from the 331,000 Instagram and 173,000 Facebook accounts removed by January. Meta stated it intends to comply with the law, despite previously opposing it alongside other platforms. Australia’s internet regulator is considering enforcement action against platforms, including Meta, for allegedly failing to implement adequate compliance measures. No other platforms have released compliance data for the same period as Meta. The Australian government introduced the law, effective December 10, in response to concerns about social media’s impact on the physical and mental health of children and young teens. As other countries consider similar age restrictions, Australia has accused the platforms of undermining the ban. The government has also proposed legislation to double the maximum penalty for non-compliance to A$99 million ($69.75 million) and to expand the regulator’s authority to obtain documents. Theo. Economy, Unalienable Rights & Ideas for an intelligent, mature audience. Intellectual, no emotionalism. We are committed to combatting Antisemitism and racism.

  • . 12Aug26 AI HALLUCINATION DEVASTATES 25 ACRES OF SESAME IN CHINESE FARMING DISASTER A 67-year-old farmer in Chuzhou, China, has lost his entire sesame crop after blindly trusting advice from an artificial intelligence chatbot. The incident, which occurred in early August 2026, serves as a stark warning about the dangers of relying on unverified AI-generated instructions for high-stakes agricultural decisions. The farmer, identified as Wu, had been using an unnamed AI application for weed and pest control for approximately one year. After months of successful advice, he placed his full trust in the system. When he asked for a treatment plan to manage weeds in his sesame fields, the AI recommended a specific chemical mixture containing "flupyrimethalin" and "flusulfasulfaether" https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chinese-farmer-kills-25-acres-of-crops-after-following-ai-generated-weed-and-pest-control-advice-farmer-trusted-pesticide-recipe-after-months-of-successful-advice The consequences were immediate and catastrophic. Within 24 hours of spraying the mixture across 150 mu (approximately 24.7 acres) of land, the sesame seedlings began to wither and die. Agricultural experts later explained that the chemical "flusulfasulfaether" is designed to target broadleaf weeds in soybean fields. Since sesame is also a broadleaf plant, the herbicide killed the crop just as effectively as the weeds. https://attackofthefanboy.com/tech/both-the-grass-and-the-seedlings-will-die-farmer-loses-25-acres-after-following-ai-advice/ Wu lamented the speed of the destruction, stating in a video interview: "If you spray it, the next day the seedlings won't survive. Both the grass and the seedlings will die, and the seedlings will die even faster" When he questioned the AI about the failure, the bot suggested that "flusulfasulfaether" might be the issue, yet it had provided no prior warning that the chemical was unsuitable for his specific crop. https://futurism.com/science-energy/farmer-horrified-ai-advice-agriculture-crops-sesame This event highlights a critical gap in AI safety: while the application displayed a generic disclaimer that "AI generation may be incorrect," the farmer, having been rewarded with success for months, felt no need to cross-check the advice with human agricultural technicians. Experts now urge farmers to treat AI as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for professional agronomic advice, noting that digital literacy is essential to prevent such costly errors. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/us/news/a-chinese-farmer-trusted-ai-after-months-of-useful-advice-its-unverified-pesticide-recommendation-reportedly-destroyed-nearly-25-acres-of-sesame-seedlings/articleshow/133150674.cms @Survival_Files_Info_Dump .

  • t.me/aipost/7787 🤖 OpenAI’s first gadget might be a donut-shaped speaker OpenAI is reportedly building a tiny AI speaker that looks more like a donut than a traditional smart speaker. About the size of a hockey puck, the battery-powered device could be carried around the house in one hand. It’s expected to have cameras, sensors, lighting and even moving parts that react to you. The goal is to make talking to ChatGPT feel less like using an app and more like talking to something that’s actually there. It would use advanced ChatGPT models for natural voice conversations, similar to the app’s Voice Mode. And despite former Apple design chief Jony Ive being involved, OpenAI reportedly doesn’t want this thing to feel like an Apple product. @Digital_ID_Au .

  • . AFRICA CUSTOMS DIGITAL REVOLUTION A historic $3.1 billion concession agreement has been signed between the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Secretariat and Abuja-based Bergmans Security Consultants and Supplies Ltd. The 20-year deal, executed on August 6, 2026, aims to digitise customs operations across 50 African nations in a move designed to eliminate corruption and accelerate intra-African trade. AfCFTA Secretary-General Wamkele Mene highlighted that manual customs systems have long contributed to revenue leakages and inefficiencies. He stated that the agreement was inspired by the proven success of Bergmans' previous work with the Nigeria Customs Service, which reportedly tripled revenue inflows and significantly reduced border corruption. BERGMANS LEADS CONTINENTAL TRANSFORMATION Under the AfCFTA Customs Modernisation Project, Bergmans will finance the full $3.1 billion investment. The company will deploy advanced digital platforms, Non-Intrusive Inspection technology, and integrated data centres to create a unified continental customs framework. The project is structured as a public-private partnership that will not replace national customs systems but rather provide a harmonised digital backbone for them. This approach ensures that African states retain control while benefiting from standardised cross-border procedures and real-time tracking of goods. TRADE GROWTH AND FUTURE OUTLOOK The initiative targets a significant boost to the current $220 billion in intra-African trade recorded in 2024. By 2035, the AfCFTA aims to increase this figure to represent 25% of total African trade, up from the current levels where it stands at roughly 18%. This modernisation effort is critical for achieving the bloc's ambition of creating a single continental market serving 1.3 billion people with a combined GDP of $3.4 trillion. The immediate implementation of the project is expected to resolve long-standing border bottlenecks and foster a more transparent trading environment. INDIRECT IMPACT ON AUSTRALIAN TRADE While the deal does not involve Australia directly, it creates substantial opportunities for Australian exporters and investors. The digitisation of African customs aims to remove long-standing bottlenecks that have historically hindered trade with the continent. By standardising procedures and enabling real-time tracking, the new system is expected to make it easier and faster for Australian businesses to export goods like minerals, agricultural products, and education services to Africa. The timing of this agreement coincides with a renewed push from Australian industry bodies to deepen economic ties with Africa. The Australian Industry Group has recently called for a more strategic approach to engaging with African markets, noting that the continent comprises 54 distinct economies with high growth potential. A more efficient customs environment across Africa directly supports this strategy by reducing the risk and cost of doing business in these emerging markets. As intra-African trade grows towards the targeted $230 billion in 2026 and beyond, the demand for high-quality imports and foreign expertise is expected to rise. Australian firms in sectors such as mining technology, renewable energy, and agri-business are well-positioned to benefit from a more integrated and transparent African market. The success of the Nigerian model, which inspired this continental deal, suggests that similar efficiency gains could soon be felt across other African nations that Australia trades with. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/08/customs-afcfta-executes-concession-agreement-with-bergmans-security/ https://leadership.ng/afcfta-bergmans-execute-20-year-concession-deal-to-digitise-customs-across-africa/ https://www.australianindustrygroup.com.au/news/media-centre/2026/australian-industry-group-calls-for-more-strategic-engagement-to-grow-australiaafrica-trade/ https://t.me/africaintel/15059 @Digital_ID_Au .

  • 🇦🇺 AI agent hacked a gym booking system In Australia - what may be its first known autonomous AI agent-driven hack. An OpenClaw agent powered by Anthropic’s Claude was asked to book its user a gym class. While navigating the booking system, it discovered something interesting: the gym’s API allowed it to cancel other people’s reservations without asking for permission. The user was already 4th on a waitlist & asked the agent if it could move him up. The agent found a shortcut. It cancelled the person sitting in 1st place. Just like that, the user moved from 4th to 3rd. No hacker in a hoodie. No sophisticated cyberattack. Just an AI agent looking at its goal and thinking: “Well..this works” Now comes the awkward part. Aus law doesn’t have a clear answer for who is responsible when an autonomous AI agent does something like this. The user? The developer? Anthropic? The gym? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-10/ai-assistant-hacks-gym-website-aus-cyber-attack/107007986 @Digital_ID_Au .

  • . by Leo AI # THE HIDDEN COST OF AI: WHY WATER IS THE NEXT BIG CRISIS While artificial intelligence (AI) promises to revolutionize industries, a silent environmental cost is mounting behind the scenes. Beyond the well-documented energy consumption and carbon…

  • . by Leo AI # THE HIDDEN COST OF AI: WHY WATER IS THE NEXT BIG CRISIS While artificial intelligence (AI) promises to revolutionize industries, a silent environmental cost is mounting behind the scenes. Beyond the well-documented energy consumption and carbon emissions, the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure is driving an unprecedented demand for fresh water. A groundbreaking 2026 study published in *Water Research* reveals that without immediate intervention, the global water footprint of AI could skyrocket to 4.2–6.6 billion cubic meters annually by 2027. [The Water Footprint of Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Solutions and Governance Imperatives](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125866) ## THE INVISIBLE DRAIN When you ask an AI a question or generate an image, the process feels intangible. However, the physical reality is far more resource-intensive. AI models run on high-density computing infrastructure in data centers that generate immense waste heat. To prevent overheating, these facilities rely on water-intensive cooling systems. The water consumption occurs in three primary ways: 1. Direct Cooling: Evaporative cooling systems at data centers consume vast amounts of water daily. 2. Indirect Use: Water used in the generation of electricity that powers the servers. 3. Manufacturing: The water-intensive process of producing the semiconductors and hardware required for AI chips. > "Unlike visible air pollution from factories, the environmental footprint of AI, including water and energy demands, is largely invisible to end users." ## A PERFECT STORM: LOCATION AND SCARCITY The crisis is compounded by geography. The study highlights a troubling trend: two-thirds of data centers built after 2022 are located in water-stressed regions. This means the infrastructure driving the AI boom is often situated in areas already struggling with water scarcity, exacerbating local shortages and creating competition with agriculture and residential needs. As AI adoption accelerates, the strain on these water resources will only intensify, potentially leading to conflicts over resource allocation and increased operational costs for tech giants. [AI's Growing Water Problem: A Global Overview](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07000-0) ## AUSTRALIA'S ROLE IN THE CRISIS Australia faces a unique and severe challenge regarding AI's water footprint. As one of the world's driest inhabited continents, the nation is already grappling with chronic water stress and frequent droughts. Despite this, Australia has become a target for major data center investments due to its stable political environment and renewable energy potential. The International Energy Agency (IEA) notes that Australia's data center sector is expanding rapidly, with new facilities often proposed in regions like Sydney and Melbourne, which have experienced significant water restrictions in recent years. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) has warned that without strict water management policies, the energy and water demands of digital infrastructure could compete directly with agricultural needs and ecological flows in the Murray-Darling Basin. Furthermore, Australia's reliance on coal-fired power for a portion of its grid means that the indirect water usage for electricity generation adds another layer of pressure. The country's potential to leverage its abundant solar and wind resources is a silver lining, but the water-intensive cooling requirements of high-density AI servers remain a critical bottleneck. Local policymakers are increasingly urged to adopt the "digital water sobriety" framework to ensure that new data center projects do not compromise the nation's water security. [Data Center Water Usage: The Silent Crisis](https://www.iea.org/reports/data-centres-and-data-transmission-networks) 👇 continues .

  • 11 авг.137из Aussie_Solutions_2026

    . ..continuing.. USEFUL RESOURCES & MORE OFFICIAL ABS GUIDES Census Information and Support: https://info.census.abs.gov.au/ How to Get a Paper Form: https://info.census.abs.gov.au/help/get-paper-form Official Census Website: https://census.abs.gov.au NEWS AND ARTICLES ABC News: What happens if you do not complete the form? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-11/all-you-need-to-know-about-census-2026/106993364 SBS News: Do you have to complete the 2026 Census? https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/when-is-census-2026-and-what-happens-if-you-dont-fill-it-out/n0scrpz41 Timeout Australia: Fines, deadlines and what you need to know https://www.timeout.com/australia/news/australias-2026-census-is-here-fines-deadlines-and-your-biggest-questions-answered-081026 CONTACT NUMBERS Census Contact Centre: 1800 181 227 Automated Paper Form Service: 1800 130 250 Always verify you are on the official abs.gov.au domain before entering any personal information. @Aussie_Solutions_2026 .

  • 11 авг.1463из Aussie_Solutions_2026

    . CENSUS NIGHT: WHAT TO DO IF YOUR PAPER FORM DIDN'T ARRIVE Tonight is Census Night (Tuesday 11 August 2026). If you requested a paper form for your PO Box or home address but it never arrived, you are not out of options. Participation in the Australian Census is compulsory, but the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) ensures you can comply without using the internet. If you change your mind and decide to do it online instead, the process is quick and secure. IMMEDIATE STEPS TO TAKE 1. CALL THE CENSUS CONTACT CENTRE Since you initially wished to avoid online submission, the most direct action is to call the ABS directly. Phone: 1800 181 227 Hours: 8am to 8pm (local time) daily. Action: Explain that you requested a paper form for your PO Box but it has not arrived. Explicitly state that you do not want to do it online (unless you have changed your mind, see section below). Outcome: The operator can arrange for a new paper form to be mailed to you. While delivery may take up to 10 days, the ABS confirms you will still have sufficient time to complete and return it. They can also note your preference for a paper-based submission to ensure no further online pressure is applied. 2. USE THE AUTOMATED PAPER FORM SERVICE If you have previously received an instruction letter containing a 16-digit Census number (even if the physical form is missing), you can use the 24-hour automated service. Phone: 1800 130 250 Availability: 24 hours a day. Note: If you have never received any mail, stick to the main contact centre (1800 181 227) first. 3. VISIT A POP-UP HUB The ABS often sets up local Census Pop-up Hubs where you can pick up a paper form in person. Check the ABS website or ask the contact centre if a hub is operating near your location. WHAT IF I CHANGE MY MIND AND WANT TO DO IT ONLINE? Even if you originally registered for a paper form, you can switch to the online method instantly. You do not need to wait for the paper form to arrive. - If you have your Census Letter: Use the 16-digit number found on the letter to log in at the official Census website. You will be prompted to create a password. - If you lost the letter or never received it: Call the Contact Centre on 1800 181 227. Tell them you have changed your mind and want to complete the Census online. They can issue you a new 12-digit Census number and a temporary password over the phone. - Security: The online system is encrypted and secure. Your answers are protected by the Census and Statistics Act, and government agencies like the ATO or Centrelink cannot see your individual responses. - Speed: Completing it online is often faster and allows you to save your progress if you need to take a break. IMPORTANT DEADLINES AND PENALTIES Census Night: All data must reflect your situation on the night of Tuesday 11 August 2026. Completing Late: Even if your form arrives a week late, you must fill it out based on where you were staying on Census Night. Fines: Failure to complete the Census after receiving a formal written direction can result in fines of up to $364 per day. It is critical to contact the ABS immediately to document your attempt to comply, regardless of the method you choose. SUMMARY OF ACTION Do not wait for the post to arrive. Call 1800 181 227 today. - If you still want a paper form: Tell them to mail one immediately. - If you changed your mind: Tell them you want to do it online and ask for a Census number to be issued over the phone. The ABS is legally required to assist you in complying, and they can switch your method of submission instantly. USEFUL RESOURCES & MORE 👇 .

  • 🇦🇺 SUPERANNUATION IN AUSTRALIA https://t.me/Survival_Files_Info_Dump/9035 https://t.me/Survival_Files_Info_Dump/9036 🇦🇺

  • . "THE NEW CENSORSHIP: AI WILL DECIDE WHAT YOU ARE ALLOWED TO KNOW" Prophecy News Watch — A new form of censorship is taking shape, and it may prove far more powerful than anything Americans have experienced before. It will not arrive with banned books, government raids, or websites disappearing overnight. It will not announce itself with warning labels declaring that certain opinions have been prohibited. Instead, it will come through a helpful chatbot....more.... https://olivetreeviews.org/the-new-censorship-ai-will-decide-what-you-are-allowed-to-know/ #aigenerated #technology #endtimes @Digital_ID_Au .

  • DIGITAL ID Au | public channel pinned «🇦🇺 CENSUS 2026 IS TUESDAY 11th AUGUST 2026 https://t.me/Aussie_News/100713 https://t.me/Aussie_News/100714 🇦🇺»

  • 🇦🇺 CENSUS 2026 IS TUESDAY 11th AUGUST 2026 https://t.me/Aussie_News/100713 https://t.me/Aussie_News/100714 🇦🇺

  • 10 авг.17022из reignitedemocracy

    видео или голосовое, без подписи

  • . ..continuing.. * Big Business is largely irresponsible in its current behavior. The retreat from voluntary safety pledges indicates that profit and speed are currently winning over caution. The Bottom Line: We are not in a "wild west" where nothing applies, but we are in a "regulatory lag" where the rules are being written *while* the technology is being deployed at scale. The system is fragile. If a major AI-caused catastrophe occurs before these regulations are fully enforced, it could trigger a massive, potentially stifling crackdown. Until then, the industry is operating on voluntary compliance that is increasingly being ignored. RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING Global Governance Frameworks A comprehensive guide to the EU AI Act, US state laws, and Asian regulations. https://www.hungyichen.com/en/insights/ai-governance-regulatory-landscape-2026 Corporate Safety Pledges The latest report detailing how major AI companies have weakened their safety commitments. https://www.axios.com/2026/07/07/report-ai-safety-pledges International Safety Report The 2026 report by over 100 experts and 30 countries on the capabilities and risks of general-purpose AI systems. https://internationalaisafetyreport.org/publication/international-ai-safety-report-2026 ✳️ SEE PREVIOUS, RELATED ARTICLE, HERE: https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au/17354 @Digital_ID_Au .

  • . THE AI GOVERNANCE CRISIS: ARE WE RACING TOWARD SAFETY OR A CLIFF? The global AI landscape in 2026 is defined by a dangerous disconnect. On one side, governments are scrambling to enact binding laws to control the technology. On the other, the world’s largest AI companies are actively retreating from their own safety promises to maintain a competitive edge. The result is a "regulatory lag" where the rules are being written while the technology is deployed at breakneck speed. While the situation is not yet "out of control" in the sense of total anarchy, it is uncontrolled enough to pose significant risks to society, the economy, and the environment. THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: FRAGMENTED BUT STRENGTHENING Governments are no longer passive observers. They have moved from "observation" to "enforcement," though the approach varies wildly by region. The European Union: The "Brussels Effect" The EU has taken the lead with the AI Act, which became fully enforceable in August 2026. It is the world’s first comprehensive, binding law, categorizing AI systems by risk level. * The Stakes: Companies violating prohibitions on social scoring or biometric surveillance face fines of up to 7% of global annual turnover. * The Impact: Due to the "Brussels Effect," global companies are adopting EU standards worldwide because it is too costly to maintain separate systems for different regions. This makes the EU the de facto global regulator. * The Gap: The Act was negotiated before the explosion of agentic AI (autonomous agents that act without human oversight), leaving a regulatory void for systems that make independent decisions. The United States: A Patchwork of State Laws The U.S. federal government has not passed a single comprehensive AI law. Instead, it relies on voluntary frameworks (like NIST) and sector-specific rules (FDA for health, SEC for finance). * The Shift: Because federal action stalled, states have taken over. California, Texas, and New York have enacted their own binding laws regarding bias, transparency, and automated decision-making. * The Result: This creates a "compliance maze" for businesses but shows that local governments are trying to be responsible even when the federal government hesitates. Asia: Speed vs. Control * China has implemented strict, prescriptive regulations requiring algorithmic registration and content alignment with state values. * Singapore is pioneering "agentic AI" governance with a tiered system for autonomous agents, trying to stay ahead of the curve. THE CORPORATE RESPONSE: THE "SPEED" V "SAFETY" DRIFT While governments are writing laws, major AI companies are weakening their own safety commitments. 1. Retreat from "Red Lines" In 2023–2024, companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google made public pledges to pause development if their models approached specific danger thresholds. * The Reality: A 2026 report by the Future of Life Institute found that these companies have weakened or eliminated these commitments. They are "moving the goalposts," arguing that the risks are theoretical and that pausing would cede ground to competitors. * The Consequence: This has created a "race to the cliff" dynamic where safety is deprioritized in favor of speed and market share. 2. The "Innovation" Defense Tech giants argue that strict regulation stifles innovation and that they are self-regulating effectively. However, internal documents and external audits suggest that safety testing is often rushed or conducted *after* deployment to avoid delays. 3. The Liability Gap When an AI agent causes harm, companies are often quick to claim that the user or the deployer is liable, not the developer. This legal maneuvering allows them to avoid accountability for the autonomous actions of their models. THE VERDICT: ARE WE RESPONSIBLE? No, not yet. We are in a dangerous transition period. * Governments are finally acting, but they are playing catch-up. The laws exist (especially in the EU), but enforcement is just beginning, and the "agentic" gap remains. 👇 continues

  • 🤖 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ARTICLE 2 of 2 THE AI GOVERNANCE CRISIS: ARE WE RACING TOWARD SAFETY OR A CLIFF? 👇 https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au/17358 .

DIGITAL ID Au | public channel — tgindex