OLOTHEA

And watch this in whole: https://youtu.be/jIYBod0ge3Y

Couldn't have said it better myself

Couldn't have said it better myself

Good luck fam

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░ 61%

Good luck fam

🫵

persistence-psychology-SKILL (3).md

I will continue updating this Skill (based on your feedback). It’s worth checking from time to time (pinned somewhere in @miladitiana) when the latest changes were made, so you’re always using the most up-to-date version. [Last Update 08.08.26 - 16:37 CEST]

For a long time many have been asking me for a formalization of my psycho-logic. I have worked based on it for many years. And now I finally cared to write it down! Modern Psychology knows what a person must not fall below, and it has little to say about what they could become. Its measure throughout is suffering: suffering decides what gets treated and when it may stop. A strategy that costs something is therefore never the one it recommends. Underneath sits a picture of a person as a system that ought to be at rest. Balance counts as health, tension as deviation, and return to an imagined state of primordial containment as the goal — as though the psyche were meant to remain an eternal embryo in the womb of the world, held in unconditional safety and comfort. The picture comes from medicine, where it holds. Carried into the psyche, it produces a framework that merely attempts to restore, and naturally fails even at that: every living system must develop in order to remain viable, and a psyche incapable of development cannot remain healthy or balanced. Growth goes the other way. It departs into something unknown and uncertain, it is frequently frightening, and it destabilizes on the way — a return to an earlier state is the one thing it never is. No framework indexed to distress can ask that of anyone. This one asks it. What gets aimed at is the whole of what a person is capable of: stronger, able to carry more, more interesting. Here the account that matters is capability, not comfort, and the standard for a life is how much aliveness it can hold — which makes boredom and emptiness weigh as heavily as death. Suffering gets a function. It is bound into something worth having, and in that binding it is overcome. The person is the operator rather than the patient. Constitution counts as input to be aimed rather than damage to be corrected, whatever produced it. And every goal gets examined before it is served: applied over and over, does this preserve what makes it work at all. Some other traditions also put development or meaning at the centre. What is added here is a criterion that can reject a goal, an end state that never arrives, and an account of what each repetition costs. It’s not an easy read but I recommend reading it to anyone who has had their own psychology explained to them accurately and found that nothing changed; to therapists, coaches and counsellors who have run out of road with symptom reduction; and to anyone seriously curious what a psychology looks like when it is built for development rather than repair.

Astrological meaning of August 12, 2026 In tropical astrology, the total solar eclipse occurs at approximately 20° Leo. Mercury and Jupiter are also in Leo; Mars has just entered Cancer; Uranus is in Gemini; Saturn and Neptune are retrograde in Aries; Venus…

Astrological meaning of August 12, 2026 In tropical astrology, the total solar eclipse occurs at approximately 20° Leo. Mercury and Jupiter are also in Leo; Mars has just entered Cancer; Uranus is in Gemini; Saturn and Neptune are retrograde in Aries; Venus is in Libra; and Pluto is retrograde in Aquarius. The widely advertised “six-planet alignment” is therefore not a six-planet conjunction: Mercury, Jupiter, Mars, Uranus, Saturn and Neptune merely appear distributed along the same broad path of the sky.

https://x.com/i/status/2084664403945775416

Lest you forget